Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Solid Waste Management Systems in African Countries: A Systematic Review

Etido Udoh Elijah, Damilola Oluwatobi Ojo, Emmanuel Alura Yakubu, Ezinne Bertila Ezeuzo, C. C. Hampo, Aminat Abubakar
{"title":"Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Solid Waste Management Systems in African Countries: A Systematic Review","authors":"Etido Udoh Elijah, Damilola Oluwatobi Ojo, Emmanuel Alura Yakubu, Ezinne Bertila Ezeuzo, C. C. Hampo, Aminat Abubakar","doi":"10.34172/jaehr.1306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a vital tool for evaluating the environmental burden of solid waste. This study investigated the outcomes of selected studies that applied the LCA methodology in assessing the environmental consequences of solid waste management (SWM) systems in Africa. Thirteen process-based LCA studies on SWM were reviewed, drawing from established criteria in databases such as SCOPUS, Elsevier, and Google Scholar. These studies were distributed across various African countries, with three conducted in Mauritius and Nigeria each, two in Zimbabwe and South Africa each, and one in Tanzania, Ghana, and Uganda, respectively. The evaluated parameters included aspects such as goal and scope, functional unit, system boundary, impact assessment categories, and sensitivity analysis. The findings revealed that majority of the studies employed similar waste management scenarios to determine the most environment-friendly, yet they differed considerably in some parameters. Climate change and global warming were the most assessed impact categories. Municipal solid waste (MSW) and plastic waste were the leading waste categories. MSW typically comprises paper, bottles, metal, plastics, glass, organics, and mixed waste proportions. The study also stated that the lack of reliable data on solid waste was a significant challenge faced by African countries in LCA studies. The paper’s findings highlighted that a significant number of the studies, particularly in Nigeria, did not incorporate sensitivity analysis into their assessments, a crucial component for result interpretation. Consequently, the study emphasizes the importance of conducting more LCA research studies in African countries to produce pertinent data on SWM.","PeriodicalId":14962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research","volume":"70 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Environmental Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jaehr.1306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a vital tool for evaluating the environmental burden of solid waste. This study investigated the outcomes of selected studies that applied the LCA methodology in assessing the environmental consequences of solid waste management (SWM) systems in Africa. Thirteen process-based LCA studies on SWM were reviewed, drawing from established criteria in databases such as SCOPUS, Elsevier, and Google Scholar. These studies were distributed across various African countries, with three conducted in Mauritius and Nigeria each, two in Zimbabwe and South Africa each, and one in Tanzania, Ghana, and Uganda, respectively. The evaluated parameters included aspects such as goal and scope, functional unit, system boundary, impact assessment categories, and sensitivity analysis. The findings revealed that majority of the studies employed similar waste management scenarios to determine the most environment-friendly, yet they differed considerably in some parameters. Climate change and global warming were the most assessed impact categories. Municipal solid waste (MSW) and plastic waste were the leading waste categories. MSW typically comprises paper, bottles, metal, plastics, glass, organics, and mixed waste proportions. The study also stated that the lack of reliable data on solid waste was a significant challenge faced by African countries in LCA studies. The paper’s findings highlighted that a significant number of the studies, particularly in Nigeria, did not incorporate sensitivity analysis into their assessments, a crucial component for result interpretation. Consequently, the study emphasizes the importance of conducting more LCA research studies in African countries to produce pertinent data on SWM.
非洲国家固体废物管理系统的生命周期评估 (LCA):系统回顾
生命周期评估(LCA)是评估固体废物环境负担的重要工具。本研究调查了应用生命周期评估方法评估非洲固体废物管理(SWM)系统环境后果的部分研究成果。根据 SCOPUS、Elsevier 和 Google Scholar 等数据库中的既定标准,对 13 项基于流程的固体废物管理 LCA 研究进行了审查。这些研究分布在非洲多个国家,其中毛里求斯和尼日利亚各进行了三项,津巴布韦和南非各进行了两项,坦桑尼亚、加纳和乌干达各进行了一项。评估参数包括目标和范围、功能单元、系统边界、影响评估类别和敏感性分析等方面。研究结果表明,大多数研究都采用了类似的废物管理方案来确定最环保的方案,但在某些参数上存在很大差异。气候变化和全球变暖是评估最多的影响类别。城市固体废物(MSW)和塑料废物是主要的废物类别。城市固体废物通常包括纸张、瓶子、金属、塑料、玻璃、有机物和混合废物。研究还指出,缺乏有关固体废物的可靠数据是非洲国家在生命周期评估研究中面临的一个重大挑战。论文的研究结果突出表明,许多研究,尤其是尼日利亚的研究,没有将敏感性分析纳入评估,而敏感性分析是结果解释的重要组成部分。因此,本研究强调了在非洲国家开展更多生命周期评估研究的重要性,以便获得有关 SWM 的相关数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信