Investigation of the clinician satisfaction for the single-puncture and double-puncture arthrocentesis of temporomandibular joint

Sara Samur Ergüven, Selda Aksoy, M.fatih Şentürk, Aydın Ozkan, Çiğdem Yücel
{"title":"Investigation of the clinician satisfaction for the single-puncture and double-puncture arthrocentesis of temporomandibular joint","authors":"Sara Samur Ergüven, Selda Aksoy, M.fatih Şentürk, Aydın Ozkan, Çiğdem Yücel","doi":"10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1392259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinician satisfaction of single-puncture arthrocentesis and double-puncture arthrocentesis in cadavers. \nMaterial and Method: The study was conducted on 10 fresh cadaver temporomandibular joints bilaterally. Single-puncture arthrocentesis was randomly conducted on one side chosen by coin toss and double-puncture arthrocentesis on the other side. The main outcome variable was clinician satisfaction and measured using 0-10 point Likert scale. \nResults: Twenty arthrocentesis procedures were completed. The mean clinical satisfaction scores for single-puncture arthrocentesis and double-puncture arthrocentesis were 8.1 and 4.8, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found between the techniques in terms of main outcome variable, and it was significantly lower in double-puncture arthrocentesis (p=0.001). \nConclusion: Single-puncture arthrocentesis showed higher clinician satisfaction compared to double-puncture arthrocentesis.","PeriodicalId":500863,"journal":{"name":"Ado klinik bilimler dergisi","volume":"37 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ado klinik bilimler dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1392259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinician satisfaction of single-puncture arthrocentesis and double-puncture arthrocentesis in cadavers. Material and Method: The study was conducted on 10 fresh cadaver temporomandibular joints bilaterally. Single-puncture arthrocentesis was randomly conducted on one side chosen by coin toss and double-puncture arthrocentesis on the other side. The main outcome variable was clinician satisfaction and measured using 0-10 point Likert scale. Results: Twenty arthrocentesis procedures were completed. The mean clinical satisfaction scores for single-puncture arthrocentesis and double-puncture arthrocentesis were 8.1 and 4.8, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found between the techniques in terms of main outcome variable, and it was significantly lower in double-puncture arthrocentesis (p=0.001). Conclusion: Single-puncture arthrocentesis showed higher clinician satisfaction compared to double-puncture arthrocentesis.
颞下颌关节单穿刺和双穿刺关节腔穿刺术临床医生满意度调查
目的:本研究旨在评估临床医生对尸体单穿刺关节穿刺术和双穿刺关节穿刺术的满意度。材料与方法:研究对象为 10 具新鲜尸体的双侧颞下颌关节。通过掷硬币随机选择一侧进行单穿刺关节穿刺术,另一侧进行双穿刺关节穿刺术。主要结果变量为临床医生满意度,采用 0-10 分李克特量表进行测量。结果:共完成了 20 例关节穿刺手术。单穿刺关节穿刺术和双穿刺关节穿刺术的平均临床满意度分别为 8.1 分和 4.8 分。就主要结果变量而言,两种技术之间存在统计学差异,而双穿刺关节穿刺术的满意度明显较低(P=0.001)。结论与双穿刺关节腔穿刺术相比,单穿刺关节腔穿刺术的临床医生满意度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信