De-identification of Free Text Data containing Personal Health Information: A Scoping Review of Reviews

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Bekelu Negash, Alan Katz, Christine J. Neilson, Moniruzzaman Moni, Marc Nesca, Alexander Singer, J. Enns
{"title":"De-identification of Free Text Data containing Personal Health Information: A Scoping Review of Reviews","authors":"Bekelu Negash, Alan Katz, Christine J. Neilson, Moniruzzaman Moni, Marc Nesca, Alexander Singer, J. Enns","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionUsing data in research often requires that the data first be de-identified, particularly in the case of health data, which often include Personal Identifiable Information (PII) and/or Personal Health Identifying Information (PHII). There are established procedures for de-identifying structured data, but de-identifying clinical notes, electronic health records, and other records that include free text data is more complex. Several different ways to achieve this are documented in the literature. This scoping review identifies categories of de-identification methods that can be used for free text data.\nMethodsWe adopted an established scoping review methodology to examine review articles published up to May 9, 2022, in Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Scopus; the ACM Digital Library; IEEE Explore; and Compendex. Our research question was: What methods are used to de-identify free text data? Two independent reviewers conducted title and abstract screening and full-text article screening using the online review management tool Covidence.\nResultsThe initial literature search retrieved 3,312 articles, most of which focused primarily on structured data. Eighteen publications describing methods of de-identification of free text data met the inclusion criteria for our review. The majority of the included articles focused on removing categories of personal health information identified by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). The de-identification methods they described combined rule-based methods or machine learning with other strategies such as deep learning.\nConclusionOur review identifies and categorises de-identification methods for free text data as rule-based methods, machine learning, deep learning and a combination of these and other approaches. Most of the articles we found in our search refer to de-identification methods that target some or all categories of PHII. Our review also highlights how de-identification systems for free text data have evolved over time and points to hybrid approaches as the most promising approach for the future.","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":"63 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionUsing data in research often requires that the data first be de-identified, particularly in the case of health data, which often include Personal Identifiable Information (PII) and/or Personal Health Identifying Information (PHII). There are established procedures for de-identifying structured data, but de-identifying clinical notes, electronic health records, and other records that include free text data is more complex. Several different ways to achieve this are documented in the literature. This scoping review identifies categories of de-identification methods that can be used for free text data. MethodsWe adopted an established scoping review methodology to examine review articles published up to May 9, 2022, in Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Scopus; the ACM Digital Library; IEEE Explore; and Compendex. Our research question was: What methods are used to de-identify free text data? Two independent reviewers conducted title and abstract screening and full-text article screening using the online review management tool Covidence. ResultsThe initial literature search retrieved 3,312 articles, most of which focused primarily on structured data. Eighteen publications describing methods of de-identification of free text data met the inclusion criteria for our review. The majority of the included articles focused on removing categories of personal health information identified by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). The de-identification methods they described combined rule-based methods or machine learning with other strategies such as deep learning. ConclusionOur review identifies and categorises de-identification methods for free text data as rule-based methods, machine learning, deep learning and a combination of these and other approaches. Most of the articles we found in our search refer to de-identification methods that target some or all categories of PHII. Our review also highlights how de-identification systems for free text data have evolved over time and points to hybrid approaches as the most promising approach for the future.
对包含个人健康信息的自由文本数据进行去身份化处理:审查范围界定审查
导言在研究中使用数据通常需要首先对数据进行去标识化处理,尤其是健康数据,其中通常包括个人身份信息 (PII) 和/或个人健康识别信息 (PHII)。对结构化数据进行去标识化已有既定程序,但对临床笔记、电子健康记录和其他包含自由文本数据的记录进行去标识化则更为复杂。文献中记载了几种不同的实现方法。本范围综述确定了可用于自由文本数据的去标识化方法的类别。方法我们采用既定的范围综述方法,研究了截至 2022 年 5 月 9 日在 Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid Embase、Scopus、ACM 数字图书馆、IEEE Explore 和 Compendex 上发表的综述文章。我们的研究问题是使用什么方法对自由文本数据进行去标识化?两位独立审稿人使用在线审稿管理工具 Covidence 进行了标题和摘要筛选以及全文筛选。结果最初的文献检索共检索到 3312 篇文章,其中大部分主要侧重于结构化数据。有 18 篇介绍自由文本数据去标识化方法的文章符合我们的审查纳入标准。所收录的文章大多侧重于删除《健康保险可携性与责任法案》(HIPAA)所确定的个人健康信息类别。我们的综述将自由文本数据的去标识化方法分为基于规则的方法、机器学习、深度学习以及这些方法和其他方法的组合。我们在搜索中发现的大多数文章都提到了针对某些或所有 PHII 类别的去标识化方法。我们的综述还强调了自由文本数据去标识化系统是如何随着时间的推移而演变的,并指出混合方法是未来最有前途的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
386
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信