Choice of Participation Method in Setting International Accounting Standards: Evidence from EFRAG as an Intermediary for Indirect Participation

Martin Gäumann, Michael Dobler
{"title":"Choice of Participation Method in Setting International Accounting Standards: Evidence from EFRAG as an Intermediary for Indirect Participation","authors":"Martin Gäumann, Michael Dobler","doi":"10.1142/s109440602450001x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Synopsis The research problem Prior empirical research on constituents’ participation in setting international accounting standards has focused on their decision whether or not to participate directly in the standard setter’s due process. However, because that focus neglects constituents’ choice between direct participation and indirect participation via an intermediary, we investigated the determinants of using an indirect method of participation as a substitute for, or in complement to, direct participation. Institutional setting We exploited the European institutional setting, where the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) serves as an intermediary for indirect participation in the due process of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). The test hypotheses Based on rational choice theory, we hypothesized that constituents from EFRAG’s inner circle and from countries with smaller capital markets, lower English-language proficiency, and/or an accounting value profile more different from that embodied in International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) have a higher probability of choosing to use indirect participation. Adopted methodology Using a sample of 7,766 comment letters (CLs) from 2005–2017, we focused on individual constituents and traced their use of indirect participation (i.e., sending CLs to EFRAG) versus direct participation (i.e., sending CLs to the IASB). We employed logistic regression models using the methods of participation as dependent variable to test our hypotheses. Controlling for factors used in prior research on direct participation, we estimated a primary model for the full sample of constituents and a secondary model with firm-specific variables for the subsample of constituents classified as corporate preparers. Findings and implications We found strong evidence that the constituents’ membership in EFRAG’s inner circle is positively related, and capital market size in the constituents’ home countries is negatively related, to choosing to use indirect participation. Country-level English-language proficiency and differences in the accounting value profile in relation to IFRS also determine the choice of participation method. Our findings suggest that a preference for indirect participation relates to the barriers to using direct participation. We provide initial evidence of a neglected aspect of Sutton’ s ( 1984 ) rational choice model and implications for EFRAG’s role as an intermediary.","PeriodicalId":101232,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Accounting","volume":"52 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s109440602450001x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Synopsis The research problem Prior empirical research on constituents’ participation in setting international accounting standards has focused on their decision whether or not to participate directly in the standard setter’s due process. However, because that focus neglects constituents’ choice between direct participation and indirect participation via an intermediary, we investigated the determinants of using an indirect method of participation as a substitute for, or in complement to, direct participation. Institutional setting We exploited the European institutional setting, where the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) serves as an intermediary for indirect participation in the due process of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). The test hypotheses Based on rational choice theory, we hypothesized that constituents from EFRAG’s inner circle and from countries with smaller capital markets, lower English-language proficiency, and/or an accounting value profile more different from that embodied in International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) have a higher probability of choosing to use indirect participation. Adopted methodology Using a sample of 7,766 comment letters (CLs) from 2005–2017, we focused on individual constituents and traced their use of indirect participation (i.e., sending CLs to EFRAG) versus direct participation (i.e., sending CLs to the IASB). We employed logistic regression models using the methods of participation as dependent variable to test our hypotheses. Controlling for factors used in prior research on direct participation, we estimated a primary model for the full sample of constituents and a secondary model with firm-specific variables for the subsample of constituents classified as corporate preparers. Findings and implications We found strong evidence that the constituents’ membership in EFRAG’s inner circle is positively related, and capital market size in the constituents’ home countries is negatively related, to choosing to use indirect participation. Country-level English-language proficiency and differences in the accounting value profile in relation to IFRS also determine the choice of participation method. Our findings suggest that a preference for indirect participation relates to the barriers to using direct participation. We provide initial evidence of a neglected aspect of Sutton’ s ( 1984 ) rational choice model and implications for EFRAG’s role as an intermediary.
选择参与制定国际会计准则的方法:欧洲财务报告咨询小组作为间接参与中介的证据
内容提要 研究问题 之前关于选民参与制定国际会计准则的实证研究主要集中在选民是否直接参与准则制定者的正当程序的决定上。然而,由于这种关注点忽视了选民在直接参与和通过中介间接参与之间的选择,因此我们调查了使用间接参与方式作为直接参与的替代或补充的决定因素。机构设置 我们利用了欧洲的机构设置,即欧洲财务报告咨询小组(EFRAG)作为间接参与国际会计准则委员会(IASB)正当程序的中介机构。检验假设 根据理性选择理论,我们假设来自欧洲财务报告咨询小组内部圈子的成员,以及来自资本市场规模较小、英语水平较低和/或会计价值取向与《国际财务报告准则》(IFRS)所体现的价值取向较为不同的国家的成员,选择间接参与的概率较高。采用的方法 我们使用 2005-2017 年期间的 7766 封意见函(CL)样本,重点关注个别成员,并追踪他们使用间接参与(即向欧洲财务报告咨询组发送意见函)与直接参与(即向国际会计准则理事会发送意见函)的情况。我们采用逻辑回归模型,将参与方式作为因变量来检验我们的假设。在控制了先前关于直接参与的研究中使用的因素后,我们对全部样本成员估计了一个主要模型,并对归类为公司编制者的样本成员子样本估计了一个带有公司特定变量的次要模型。研究结果及启示 我们发现,有强有力的证据表明,成员在欧洲财务报告咨询集团内部圈子中的成员资格与选择使用间接参与正相关,而成员所在国的资本市场规模与选择使用间接参与负相关。国家层面的英语水平以及与《国际财务报告准则》相关的会计价值概况差异也决定了参与方式的选择。我们的研究结果表明,对间接参与的偏好与使用直接参与的障碍有关。我们提供了萨顿(1984 年)理性选择模型中被忽视的一个方面的初步证据,以及对欧洲财务报告咨询组作为中介角色的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信