INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL FRENTE A RESOLUÇÃO DE EXERCÍCIOS DE QUÍMICA: UM ESTUDO EXPLORATÓRIO COM O CHATGPT

Ingrid Domene Eugenio, Leonardo Augusto Martins Silva, Caio Murilo dos Santos, G. Gibin
{"title":"INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL FRENTE A RESOLUÇÃO DE EXERCÍCIOS DE QUÍMICA: UM ESTUDO EXPLORATÓRIO COM O CHATGPT","authors":"Ingrid Domene Eugenio, Leonardo Augusto Martins Silva, Caio Murilo dos Santos, G. Gibin","doi":"10.5747/ch.2023.v20.h571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New forms of Artificial Intelligence are gaining more space at schools and among students. ChatGPT stands out for its easy use and, in Chemistry Teaching, this tool has stood out for the numerous possibilities, including problem solving. However, there is still not 100% certainty of the effectiveness of such instrument. This work aims to investigate the potential and capacity of ChatGPT to solve exercises involving stoichiometric calculations and balancing chemical equations. These problems were extracted from a textbook for 2nd year of high school widely used by Basic Education teachers and approved by the National Textbook Program. Due to the research exploratory nature, four questions were selected, two simpler and two more laborious and complex. Furthermore, in case the ChatGPT presented the result incorrectly, some tests were performed to analyze whether a change in the statement would also generate a change in the results. These, by the way, reveal that the chat excels in the language used, as it is simple and easy to understand. On the other hand, it disappointing when solving stoichiometry problems, as it confuses concepts and does not consider all atoms when balancing an equation. In other words, unless it is already balanced correctly, the use of ChatGPT it is not indicated for solving exercises of this type and despite being a promising tool with some qualities, it is not recommended for those who do not have complete knowledge and/or a necessary discernment to detect the mistakes it made and correct them.","PeriodicalId":33252,"journal":{"name":"Colloquium Humanarum","volume":"55 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colloquium Humanarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5747/ch.2023.v20.h571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New forms of Artificial Intelligence are gaining more space at schools and among students. ChatGPT stands out for its easy use and, in Chemistry Teaching, this tool has stood out for the numerous possibilities, including problem solving. However, there is still not 100% certainty of the effectiveness of such instrument. This work aims to investigate the potential and capacity of ChatGPT to solve exercises involving stoichiometric calculations and balancing chemical equations. These problems were extracted from a textbook for 2nd year of high school widely used by Basic Education teachers and approved by the National Textbook Program. Due to the research exploratory nature, four questions were selected, two simpler and two more laborious and complex. Furthermore, in case the ChatGPT presented the result incorrectly, some tests were performed to analyze whether a change in the statement would also generate a change in the results. These, by the way, reveal that the chat excels in the language used, as it is simple and easy to understand. On the other hand, it disappointing when solving stoichiometry problems, as it confuses concepts and does not consider all atoms when balancing an equation. In other words, unless it is already balanced correctly, the use of ChatGPT it is not indicated for solving exercises of this type and despite being a promising tool with some qualities, it is not recommended for those who do not have complete knowledge and/or a necessary discernment to detect the mistakes it made and correct them.
人工智能解决化学习题:利用 chatgpt 的探索性研究
新形式的人工智能在学校和学生中的应用越来越广泛。ChatGPT 因其简单易用而脱颖而出,在化学教学中,这一工具也因其包括解决问题在内的多种可能性而脱颖而出。然而,这种工具的有效性还不能百分之百确定。这项工作旨在研究 ChatGPT 在解决化学计量计算和化学方程式平衡练习方面的潜力和能力。这些问题摘自基础教育教师广泛使用并经国家教材计划批准的高中二年级教科书。由于研究的探索性,我们选择了四道题,其中两道比较简单,两道比较费力和复杂。此外,如果 ChatGPT 呈现的结果不正确,还进行了一些测试,以分析改变陈述是否也会导致结果的改变。顺便提一下,这些测试表明,聊天工具在语言使用方面表现出色,因为它简单易懂。另一方面,它在解决化学计量问题时却令人失望,因为它混淆了概念,在平衡方程式时没有考虑到所有原子。换句话说,除非已经正确平衡,否则不建议使用 ChatGPT 来解决此类习题,尽管它是一款很有前途的工具,但不建议那些不具备完整知识和/或必要辨别力的人使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信