The changing epidemiology of preterm labour and delivery: A systematic literature review

Tina Li, H. Rochon, S. Szabo, Emilia Kourmaeva, Megan Manuel, Vanessa Perez Patel
{"title":"The changing epidemiology of preterm labour and delivery: A systematic literature review","authors":"Tina Li, H. Rochon, S. Szabo, Emilia Kourmaeva, Megan Manuel, Vanessa Perez Patel","doi":"10.1002/rfc2.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To identify and synthesize epidemiologic data for preterm labour (PTL) and preterm birth (PTB).A systematic search, with protocol registered in PROSPERO, was implemented in MEDLINE and EMBASE and supplemented by web‐based and grey literature searches. Observational, population‐based studies in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain, and Italy, published in English between 2012 and 2022 were considered for inclusion. Estimates by country were reported and stratified by gestational age, birth plurality, and race/ethnicity, data permitting.Ten publications and nine grey literature reports were included. Epidemiologic estimates of PTL were reported for the United Kingdom and France: PTL was diagnosed in 2.2% of pregnancies and preceded 50% of PTBs. PTB rates were reported for the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, France, and Spain. Among live births in these countries, annual PTB incidence ranged from 5.9% (Spain, 2020) to 10.2% (United States, 2019). Most countries reported the PTB incidence by gestational age; reports by birth plurality or race/ethnicity were scarce. PTB rates for Germany or Italy were not identified.While PTBs were well‐reported overall and by gestational age, how rates varied by plurality, race/ethnicity and etiology is unclear. Epidemiologic estimates for PTL, a leading cause of PTB, were rarely reported in the literature. Population‐based research is needed to understand the burden of PTL and for decision making regarding the management of this condition.","PeriodicalId":74669,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive, female and child health","volume":"24 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive, female and child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rfc2.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To identify and synthesize epidemiologic data for preterm labour (PTL) and preterm birth (PTB).A systematic search, with protocol registered in PROSPERO, was implemented in MEDLINE and EMBASE and supplemented by web‐based and grey literature searches. Observational, population‐based studies in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain, and Italy, published in English between 2012 and 2022 were considered for inclusion. Estimates by country were reported and stratified by gestational age, birth plurality, and race/ethnicity, data permitting.Ten publications and nine grey literature reports were included. Epidemiologic estimates of PTL were reported for the United Kingdom and France: PTL was diagnosed in 2.2% of pregnancies and preceded 50% of PTBs. PTB rates were reported for the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, France, and Spain. Among live births in these countries, annual PTB incidence ranged from 5.9% (Spain, 2020) to 10.2% (United States, 2019). Most countries reported the PTB incidence by gestational age; reports by birth plurality or race/ethnicity were scarce. PTB rates for Germany or Italy were not identified.While PTBs were well‐reported overall and by gestational age, how rates varied by plurality, race/ethnicity and etiology is unclear. Epidemiologic estimates for PTL, a leading cause of PTB, were rarely reported in the literature. Population‐based research is needed to understand the burden of PTL and for decision making regarding the management of this condition.
不断变化的早产和分娩流行病学:系统文献综述
在 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 中进行系统性检索,并辅以网络检索和灰色文献检索,检索方案已在 PROSPERO 中注册。美国、加拿大、英国、法国、德国、西班牙和意大利在 2012 年至 2022 年间发表的以人口为基础的观察性研究的英文版均被纳入考虑范围。在数据允许的情况下,报告了各国的估计值,并按妊娠年龄、出生多元性和种族/人种进行了分层。英国和法国报告了 PTL 的流行病学估计值:2.2% 的孕妇被诊断为 PTL,50% 的 PTB 发生在 PTL 之前。美国、加拿大、英国、法国和西班牙均报告了 PTB 发生率。在这些国家的活产婴儿中,PTB 的年发病率从 5.9%(西班牙,2020 年)到 10.2%(美国,2019 年)不等。大多数国家按孕龄报告了肺结核的发病率;按出生多元性或种族/人种报告的情况很少。德国或意大利的 PTB 发病率尚未确定。虽然 PTB 的总体报告和按孕龄分列的报告较多,但按多民族、种族/族裔和病因分列的 PTB 发病率如何变化尚不清楚。PTL是导致PTB的一个主要原因,文献中很少报道PTL的流行病学估计值。需要开展基于人群的研究,以了解 PTL 的负担,并就该病症的管理做出决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信