Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Romanian Version of Thriving at Work Scale

IF 3.2 3区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

European Journal of Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2023-12-12 DOI:10.1027/1015-5759/a000804

Norberth-Ioan Okros, D. Vîrgă

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The present research aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Romanian version of the thriving at work scale (TWS). Three studies were conducted to test the reliability and validity of the TWS. The first study ( N = 451) aimed to adapt and validate the Romanian version of TWS. The confirmatory factor analysis results indicated that the second-order model with 10-items has a good value of the fit indices. The second study ( N = 435) tested measurement invariances, demonstrating that the Romanian version of this scale has varying levels of thriving at work across job tenure and a differential functioning of items 2 and 9 across age. The third study ( N = 312) cross-validated the second-order model. It tested the construct-related validity of TWS with other relevant constructs (job and career satisfaction, burnout, mental health complaints, performance). The results indicated that the TWS is a reliable and valid instrument demonstrating the crucial implications for Romanian working people’s well-being and career development.

查看原文本刊更多论文

评估罗马尼亚语版《工作欣欣向荣量表》的心理测量特性

摘要：本研究旨在评估罗马尼亚语版工作欣欣向荣量表（TWS）的心理测量特性。为测试工作中茁壮成长量表的可靠性和有效性，我们进行了三项研究。第一项研究（N = 451）旨在调整和验证罗马尼亚语版的工作欣欣向荣量表。确认性因素分析结果表明，包含 10 个项目的二阶模型具有良好的拟合指数值。第二项研究（N = 435）对测量不变量进行了测试，结果表明该量表的罗马尼亚语版本在不同的工作任期内具有不同的工作欣欣向荣程度，并且项目 2 和项目 9 在不同的年龄段具有不同的功能。第三项研究（N = 312）对二阶模型进行了交叉验证。它测试了 "工作中的欣欣向荣 "与其他相关建构（工作和职业满意度、职业倦怠、心理健康投诉、绩效）的建构相关有效性。结果表明，TWS 是一种可靠有效的工具，对罗马尼亚职场人士的福祉和职业发展具有重要意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Journal of Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

6.40

自引率

4.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The main purpose of the EJPA is to present important articles which provide seminal information on both theoretical and applied developments in this field. Articles reporting the construction of new measures or an advancement of an existing measure are given priority. The journal is directed to practitioners as well as to academicians: The conviction of its editors is that the discipline of psychological assessment should, necessarily and firmly, be attached to the roots of psychological science, while going deeply into all the consequences of its applied, practice-oriented development.