Brewers’ spent grain pretreatment optimisation to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of whole slurry and resuspended pellet

IF 2.5 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
J. Castilla-Archilla, M. Cermeño, Maria G. Tuohy, Richard J. FitzGerald, Piet N. L. Lens
{"title":"Brewers’ spent grain pretreatment optimisation to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of whole slurry and resuspended pellet","authors":"J. Castilla-Archilla, M. Cermeño, Maria G. Tuohy, Richard J. FitzGerald, Piet N. L. Lens","doi":"10.3389/fceng.2023.1272988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A thermal diluted acid pretreatment using brewers spent grain (BSG) was optimised to improve enzymatic hydrolysis while minimising energy and chemical inputs. First, the use of hydrochloric or sulfuric acid for pretreatment was compared, using hydrochloric acid for the next steps. Three different dilute acid thermal pretreatment combinations were optimised in terms of acid concentration, temperature and time using a response surface methodology. Optimization was based on i) highest remaining protein content in the solid fraction (C1: 0.49% HCl; 87.7°C; 92 min), ii) highest liquid recovery (C2: 0.80% HCl; 121.0°C; 142 min), iii) lowest acid concentration applied to achieve largest protein and lowest remaining solid levels (C3: 0.10% HCl; 104.0°C; 70 min); and iv) a final condition based on the lowest water retention capacity when using HCl (C4: 0.20% HCl; 121.0°C; 20 min). The efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis was evaluated, in the absence and presence of a large concentration of reducing carbohydrates, by centrifuging the slurry after acid pretreatment, recovering the solid fraction and resuspending it in fresh water. In C2, the enzyme (Depol 40L) was added directly to the entire slurry after pretreatment. For C1, C3, and C4 direct addition of enzyme to the whole slurry resulted in a higher release of carbohydrates during hydrolysis. Only in the case of C2 did the use of the resuspended solid result in a higher carbohydrate release. The overall carbohydrate recovery efficiency in the liquid fractions for C1, C2, C3 and C4 corresponded to 399.1 (±26.1), 535.8 (±28.7), 257.0 (±11.5), and 446.3 (±81.1) mg carbohydrate per Gram of BSG (dry weight), respectively. C1 and C4 were considered the optimal pretreatments as these combined a low acid concentration and energy input prior to enzymatic hydrolysis.","PeriodicalId":73073,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in chemical engineering","volume":"6 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in chemical engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fceng.2023.1272988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A thermal diluted acid pretreatment using brewers spent grain (BSG) was optimised to improve enzymatic hydrolysis while minimising energy and chemical inputs. First, the use of hydrochloric or sulfuric acid for pretreatment was compared, using hydrochloric acid for the next steps. Three different dilute acid thermal pretreatment combinations were optimised in terms of acid concentration, temperature and time using a response surface methodology. Optimization was based on i) highest remaining protein content in the solid fraction (C1: 0.49% HCl; 87.7°C; 92 min), ii) highest liquid recovery (C2: 0.80% HCl; 121.0°C; 142 min), iii) lowest acid concentration applied to achieve largest protein and lowest remaining solid levels (C3: 0.10% HCl; 104.0°C; 70 min); and iv) a final condition based on the lowest water retention capacity when using HCl (C4: 0.20% HCl; 121.0°C; 20 min). The efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis was evaluated, in the absence and presence of a large concentration of reducing carbohydrates, by centrifuging the slurry after acid pretreatment, recovering the solid fraction and resuspending it in fresh water. In C2, the enzyme (Depol 40L) was added directly to the entire slurry after pretreatment. For C1, C3, and C4 direct addition of enzyme to the whole slurry resulted in a higher release of carbohydrates during hydrolysis. Only in the case of C2 did the use of the resuspended solid result in a higher carbohydrate release. The overall carbohydrate recovery efficiency in the liquid fractions for C1, C2, C3 and C4 corresponded to 399.1 (±26.1), 535.8 (±28.7), 257.0 (±11.5), and 446.3 (±81.1) mg carbohydrate per Gram of BSG (dry weight), respectively. C1 and C4 were considered the optimal pretreatments as these combined a low acid concentration and energy input prior to enzymatic hydrolysis.
优化啤酒废谷的预处理,以提高整浆和再悬浮颗粒的酶水解效果
对使用酿酒乏谷(BSG)的热稀酸预处理进行了优化,以改善酶水解,同时最大限度地减少能源和化学投入。首先,对使用盐酸还是硫酸进行预处理进行了比较,并在接下来的步骤中使用盐酸。利用响应面方法,从酸浓度、温度和时间方面对三种不同的稀酸热预处理组合进行了优化。优化的依据是:i) 固体部分剩余蛋白质含量最高(C1:0.49% HCl;87.7°C;92 分钟);ii) 液体回收率最高(C2:0.80% HCl;121.0°C;142 分钟);iii) 酸浓度最低,蛋白质含量最高,剩余固体含量最低(C3:0.10% HCl;104.0°C;70 分钟);以及 iv) 使用盐酸时保水能力最低的最终条件(C4:0.20% HCl;121.0°C;20 分钟)。在没有和存在高浓度还原性碳水化合物的情况下,通过离心酸预处理后的浆液,回收固体部分并将其重新悬浮在清水中,来评估酶水解的效率。在 C2 中,酶(Depol 40L)被直接添加到预处理后的整个泥浆中。在 C1、C3 和 C4 中,直接将酶添加到整个泥浆中会在水解过程中释放出更多的碳水化合物。只有在 C2 的情况下,使用重新悬浮的固体才会导致更高的碳水化合物释放量。C1、C2、C3 和 C4 在液体馏分中的总体碳水化合物回收效率分别为每克 BSG(干重)399.1 (±26.1)、535.8 (±28.7)、257.0 (±11.5) 和 446.3 (±81.1) 毫克碳水化合物。C1 和 C4 被认为是最佳预处理方法,因为它们在酶水解前结合了低酸浓度和低能量输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信