EVALUATION OF THE ACCURACY OF THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT'S NURSES’ TRIAGE DECISION USING THE ESI SYSTEM

Gültekin Akyol, Cem Oktay, Fatma Selman
{"title":"EVALUATION OF THE ACCURACY OF THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT'S NURSES’ TRIAGE DECISION USING THE ESI SYSTEM","authors":"Gültekin Akyol, Cem Oktay, Fatma Selman","doi":"10.55994/ejcc.1352144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Emergency triage is extremely important in reducing morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of triage categorization decisions of triage nurses with the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) system categorization determined after the emergency room evaluation of patients. \n \nMaterials and Method: In this descriptive, cross-sectional study, patients who were admitted to Akdeniz University Hospital Emergency Service Adult Triage Area between 01-14 March 2018 and then admitted to the emergency department were evaluated retrospectively. \n \nResults: Triage scores of 3324 patients were analyzed. The kappa concordance value between the score of the triage nurse and the scores of the physicians using ESI was found to be 0.416. It was determined that the triage staff gave a triage score 1/4 lower than the ESI. In the presence of tachypnea, an increase in the low triage rate and a decrease in the high triage rate of the patients were found. It was determined that the most accurate triage scores were given in nephrological and cardiovascular disorders. The most faulty triage decisions were eye disorders and oncological emergencies. In patients between the ages of 18-65, statistically significantly higher triage was performed. Patients with chronic diseases and a history of continuous drug use were given lower triage. \n \nConclusion: In order to increase the accuracy of triage, it is necessary to increase the medical knowledge of the triage nurse and to provide practical training especially on real cases with a triage score of 2-4.","PeriodicalId":482762,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Critical Care","volume":"9 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55994/ejcc.1352144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Emergency triage is extremely important in reducing morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of triage categorization decisions of triage nurses with the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) system categorization determined after the emergency room evaluation of patients. Materials and Method: In this descriptive, cross-sectional study, patients who were admitted to Akdeniz University Hospital Emergency Service Adult Triage Area between 01-14 March 2018 and then admitted to the emergency department were evaluated retrospectively. Results: Triage scores of 3324 patients were analyzed. The kappa concordance value between the score of the triage nurse and the scores of the physicians using ESI was found to be 0.416. It was determined that the triage staff gave a triage score 1/4 lower than the ESI. In the presence of tachypnea, an increase in the low triage rate and a decrease in the high triage rate of the patients were found. It was determined that the most accurate triage scores were given in nephrological and cardiovascular disorders. The most faulty triage decisions were eye disorders and oncological emergencies. In patients between the ages of 18-65, statistically significantly higher triage was performed. Patients with chronic diseases and a history of continuous drug use were given lower triage. Conclusion: In order to increase the accuracy of triage, it is necessary to increase the medical knowledge of the triage nurse and to provide practical training especially on real cases with a triage score of 2-4.
评估急诊科护士使用 ESI 系统做出分诊决定的准确性
目的:急诊分诊对降低发病率和死亡率极为重要。本研究旨在比较分诊护士的分诊分类决定与急诊室对患者进行评估后确定的急诊严重程度指数(ESI)系统分类的准确性。 材料和方法:在这项描述性横断面研究中,对2018年3月01日至14日期间阿克登尼兹大学医院急诊服务部成人分诊区收治的患者进行了回顾性评估,然后将其送入急诊科。 结果:对3324名患者的分诊评分进行了分析。发现分诊护士的评分与使用 ESI 的医生评分之间的 kappa 一致性值为 0.416。分诊人员给出的分诊评分比 ESI 低 1/4 。在存在呼吸过速的情况下,发现患者的低分流率增加,高分流率降低。结果表明,肾病和心血管疾病患者的分诊评分最为准确。最错误的分诊决定是眼科疾病和肿瘤急诊。据统计,18-65 岁患者的分诊率明显更高。慢性病患者和有持续用药史的患者分流率较低。 结论为了提高分诊的准确性,有必要增加分诊护士的医学知识,并提供实践培训,尤其是对分诊分数为 2-4 分的真实病例进行培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信