Science education in the Anthropocene: the aesthetics of climate change education in an epoch of uncertainty

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Joseph Paul Ferguson, Peta J. White
{"title":"Science education in the Anthropocene: the aesthetics of climate change education in an epoch of uncertainty","authors":"Joseph Paul Ferguson, Peta J. White","doi":"10.3389/feduc.2023.1281746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have a responsibility as science educators to work with young people to enact education that enables collective rebalancing of relationships between humans and more-than-humans that are disturbed by human-induced climate change. However, to date, climate change education has not been prioritized in school science at a policy, curricula, classroom and community level, due to an aesthetic which does not sufficiently value climate science or recognize the social impacts of science as part of the discipline. We argue in this conceptual research paper from a pragmatist perspective that an aesthetic shift is required to include science as part of climate change education as a transdisciplinary endeavor that focuses on addressing socio-ecological challenges through student agency and community action. We explore the synergy between science education aesthetics and climate change aesthetics as we advocate for a transformative aesthetics of climate change education. We do so through a process of reflection on and conceptualization of our stories of climate change education in Australia. We propose that such an aesthetic (how we ought to value) should not be considered in isolation but rather that it forms the basis for the ethics (how we ought to conduct ourselves) and logic (how we ought to think) of young people being with us in a community of inquiry in the Anthropocene. We argue that we (teachers and students) ought to conduct ourselves in loving ways toward human and more-than-human kin that necessitates that we think as a community of inquiry to address the challenges of the Anthropocene. In doing so we suggest that we can realize a radical pragmatist meliorism for climate change education that is underpinned by the three normative sciences, the most foundational of which is aesthetics.","PeriodicalId":52290,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Education","volume":"38 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1281746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We have a responsibility as science educators to work with young people to enact education that enables collective rebalancing of relationships between humans and more-than-humans that are disturbed by human-induced climate change. However, to date, climate change education has not been prioritized in school science at a policy, curricula, classroom and community level, due to an aesthetic which does not sufficiently value climate science or recognize the social impacts of science as part of the discipline. We argue in this conceptual research paper from a pragmatist perspective that an aesthetic shift is required to include science as part of climate change education as a transdisciplinary endeavor that focuses on addressing socio-ecological challenges through student agency and community action. We explore the synergy between science education aesthetics and climate change aesthetics as we advocate for a transformative aesthetics of climate change education. We do so through a process of reflection on and conceptualization of our stories of climate change education in Australia. We propose that such an aesthetic (how we ought to value) should not be considered in isolation but rather that it forms the basis for the ethics (how we ought to conduct ourselves) and logic (how we ought to think) of young people being with us in a community of inquiry in the Anthropocene. We argue that we (teachers and students) ought to conduct ourselves in loving ways toward human and more-than-human kin that necessitates that we think as a community of inquiry to address the challenges of the Anthropocene. In doing so we suggest that we can realize a radical pragmatist meliorism for climate change education that is underpinned by the three normative sciences, the most foundational of which is aesthetics.
人类世的科学教育:不确定时代的气候变化教育美学
作为科学教育工作者,我们有责任与年轻人一起开展教育,使人类与受到人类引起的气候变化干扰的 "非人类 "之间的关系得到集体的重新平衡。然而,迄今为止,气候变化教育在学校科学的政策、课程、课堂和社区层面都没有得到优先考虑,原因是人们的审美观没有充分重视气候科学,也没有认识到科学作为学科的一部分所产生的社会影响。在这篇概念性研究论文中,我们从实用主义的角度出发,认为需要转变审美观,将科学作为气候变化教育的一部分,将其作为一种跨学科的努力,侧重于通过学生的能动性和社区行动来应对社会生态挑战。我们倡导气候变化教育的变革美学,探索科学教育美学与气候变化美学之间的协同作用。我们通过对澳大利亚气候变化教育故事的反思和概念化过程来实现这一目标。我们提出,这种美学(我们应该如何评价)不应孤立地加以考虑,而应构成年轻人在人类世中与我们共同探究的伦理(我们应该如何行事)和逻辑(我们应该如何思考)的基础。我们认为,我们(教师和学生)应该以关爱的方式对待人类和非人类的亲属,这就要求我们以探究群体的方式进行思考,以应对人类世的挑战。为此,我们建议,我们可以为气候变化教育实现一种激进的实用主义美化论,这种美化论以三门规范科学为基础,其中最基础的科学是美学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Education
Frontiers in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
887
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信