Interactions among national and supranational identities: mobilizing the independence movement in Scotland

IF 2.3 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Michael T. Heaney, Erika L. Anderson, Madilyn E. Cancro, Grace E. Martin
{"title":"Interactions among national and supranational identities: mobilizing the independence movement in Scotland","authors":"Michael T. Heaney, Erika L. Anderson, Madilyn E. Cancro, Grace E. Martin","doi":"10.3389/fpos.2023.1281437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As nationalism rises worldwide, understanding the relevance of national identities is at a premium in both the study of mass political behavior and the analysis of social movements. Drawing on research in social psychology, this study explores interactions among national and supranational identities using the concepts of identity interference (i.e., negative interactions) and identity complementarity (i.e., positive interactions). These interactions extend beyond the direct effects of identity considered in many previous studies. Focusing on interactions centers the analysis on the contextual aspects of identity during nationalist mobilizations. Survey data from Scotland demonstrate that interactions among Scottish, British, and European identities were consequential for mobilizing support for Scottish independence in 2019. Strong evidence indicates interference between Scottish and British identities. European and Scottish identities complement one another among independence supporters but not in the general population. The possibility of interference between European and British identities is backed by only mixed results. The timing of this study in the aftermath of the Brexit referendum was likely relevant to its findings on European identity. Overall, this research illustrates the benefits of widening the empirical examination of multiple identities in the social sciences.","PeriodicalId":34431,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Political Science","volume":"33 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2023.1281437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As nationalism rises worldwide, understanding the relevance of national identities is at a premium in both the study of mass political behavior and the analysis of social movements. Drawing on research in social psychology, this study explores interactions among national and supranational identities using the concepts of identity interference (i.e., negative interactions) and identity complementarity (i.e., positive interactions). These interactions extend beyond the direct effects of identity considered in many previous studies. Focusing on interactions centers the analysis on the contextual aspects of identity during nationalist mobilizations. Survey data from Scotland demonstrate that interactions among Scottish, British, and European identities were consequential for mobilizing support for Scottish independence in 2019. Strong evidence indicates interference between Scottish and British identities. European and Scottish identities complement one another among independence supporters but not in the general population. The possibility of interference between European and British identities is backed by only mixed results. The timing of this study in the aftermath of the Brexit referendum was likely relevant to its findings on European identity. Overall, this research illustrates the benefits of widening the empirical examination of multiple identities in the social sciences.
民族身份与超国家身份之间的互动:苏格兰独立运动的动员工作
随着民族主义在全球范围内的兴起,了解国家认同的相关性在大众政治行为研究和社会运动分析中都显得尤为重要。本研究借鉴了社会心理学的研究成果,利用身份干扰(即负面互动)和身份互补(即正面互动)的概念,探讨了国家身份和超国家身份之间的互动。这些互动超出了以往许多研究中考虑的身份认同的直接影响。对互动的关注使分析集中于民族主义动员过程中身份认同的背景方面。来自苏格兰的调查数据表明,苏格兰、英国和欧洲身份之间的互动对 2019 年动员支持苏格兰独立至关重要。有力的证据表明苏格兰身份和英国身份之间存在干扰。在独立支持者中,欧洲身份和苏格兰身份是互补的,但在普通民众中并非如此。欧洲身份认同与英国身份认同之间相互干扰的可能性仅得到了好坏参半的结果支持。在英国脱欧公投之后进行这项研究的时机很可能与欧洲身份认同的研究结果有关。总之,这项研究说明了在社会科学中扩大对多重身份的实证研究的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Political Science
Frontiers in Political Science Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信