Patient perceptions of ICU physiotherapy: ‘Your body needs to go somewhere to be recharged ... ’

IF 0.8 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
F. Karachi, M. B. Van Nes, S. Hanekom, R. Gosselink
{"title":"Patient perceptions of ICU physiotherapy: ‘Your body needs to go somewhere to be recharged ... ’","authors":"F. Karachi, M. B. Van Nes, S. Hanekom, R. Gosselink","doi":"10.7196/sajcc.2023.v39i3.1092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\n\nBackground. Patient satisfaction is an essential concept to consider for the improvement of quality care in healthcare centres and hospitals and has been linked to increased patient compliance with treatment plans, better patient safety and improved clinical outcomes.\nObjective. As part of a before-and-after clinical trial aimed to investigate the implementation of an evidence-based and -validated physiotherapy protocol within a surgical intensive care unit (ICU), we decided to include the patient perception of physiotherapy received in the intervention unit.\nMethod. A nested, exploratory, descriptive, qualitative study design was adopted. Purposively selected adult patients discharged from ICU during the implementation phase of the trial were interviewed.\nResults. Eighteen patients (10 male) with a median age of 44 years and median ICU length of stay (LOS) of six days were included. Three themes and nine categories emerged: (i) linking therapy to clinical outcome (patient expectations and understanding; physiotherapy activities and the implication of mobilisation; physiotherapy benefits and progression); (ii) the importance of developing a trusting relationship (physiotherapy value; safety; continuity of care); and (iii) communication (satisfaction; interactions and patient perception and experience of physiotherapy).\nConclusion. While confirming barriers to early mobility, patients perceived participation in mobility activities as a marked jolt in their journey to recovery following a critical incident. Effective communication and preservation of trust between physiotherapist and patient are essential for understanding expectations and can facilitate improved outcomes. Clinicians can use the information when managing critically ill patients. Including patient-reported outcomes to measure physiotherapy interventions used in the ICU is feasible and can inform the development of such outcomes.\n\n\n\n\n \n ","PeriodicalId":42653,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Critical Care","volume":"88 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/sajcc.2023.v39i3.1092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Patient satisfaction is an essential concept to consider for the improvement of quality care in healthcare centres and hospitals and has been linked to increased patient compliance with treatment plans, better patient safety and improved clinical outcomes. Objective. As part of a before-and-after clinical trial aimed to investigate the implementation of an evidence-based and -validated physiotherapy protocol within a surgical intensive care unit (ICU), we decided to include the patient perception of physiotherapy received in the intervention unit. Method. A nested, exploratory, descriptive, qualitative study design was adopted. Purposively selected adult patients discharged from ICU during the implementation phase of the trial were interviewed. Results. Eighteen patients (10 male) with a median age of 44 years and median ICU length of stay (LOS) of six days were included. Three themes and nine categories emerged: (i) linking therapy to clinical outcome (patient expectations and understanding; physiotherapy activities and the implication of mobilisation; physiotherapy benefits and progression); (ii) the importance of developing a trusting relationship (physiotherapy value; safety; continuity of care); and (iii) communication (satisfaction; interactions and patient perception and experience of physiotherapy). Conclusion. While confirming barriers to early mobility, patients perceived participation in mobility activities as a marked jolt in their journey to recovery following a critical incident. Effective communication and preservation of trust between physiotherapist and patient are essential for understanding expectations and can facilitate improved outcomes. Clinicians can use the information when managing critically ill patients. Including patient-reported outcomes to measure physiotherapy interventions used in the ICU is feasible and can inform the development of such outcomes.    
患者对重症监护室物理治疗的看法:"你的身体需要去某个地方充电......
背景。患者满意度是提高医疗保健中心和医院护理质量的一个重要概念,它与提高患者对治疗计划的依从性、改善患者安全和提高临床疗效息息相关。作为一项前后对比临床试验的一部分,该试验旨在调查外科重症监护病房(ICU)内循证和验证物理治疗方案的实施情况,我们决定将患者对干预病房内接受物理治疗的看法纳入其中。采用嵌套式、探索性、描述性、定性研究设计。我们有针对性地选择了在试验实施阶段从重症监护室出院的成年患者进行了访谈。共纳入 18 名患者(10 名男性),中位年龄为 44 岁,中位重症监护室住院时间(LOS)为 6 天。访谈中出现了三个主题和九个类别:(i) 将治疗与临床结果联系起来(患者的期望和理解;物理治疗活动和活动能力的影响;物理治疗的益处和进展);(ii) 建立信任关系的重要性(物理治疗的价值;安全性;护理的连续性);(iii) 沟通(满意度;互动以及患者对物理治疗的感知和体验)。在确认早期移动障碍的同时,患者认为参与移动活动是他们在危重事件后康复过程中的一个显著进步。物理治疗师与患者之间的有效沟通和保持信任对于了解患者的期望和改善治疗效果至关重要。临床医生在管理危重病人时可以利用这些信息。将患者报告的结果纳入重症监护室物理治疗干预措施的衡量标准是可行的,并可为此类结果的制定提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: This Journal publishes scientific articles related to multidisciplinary critical and intensive medical care and the emergency care of critically ill humans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信