Preliminary report of extracorporeal blood purification therapy in patients receiving LVAD: Cytosorb or Jafron HA330

Z. Nurmykhametova, T. Lesbekov, R. Kaliyev, Bolat Bekishev, Nilufar Jabayeva, S. Novikova, L. Faizov, I. Vakhrushev, Yuriy Pya
{"title":"Preliminary report of extracorporeal blood purification therapy in patients receiving LVAD: Cytosorb or Jafron HA330","authors":"Z. Nurmykhametova, T. Lesbekov, R. Kaliyev, Bolat Bekishev, Nilufar Jabayeva, S. Novikova, L. Faizov, I. Vakhrushev, Yuriy Pya","doi":"10.1051/ject/2023048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) candidates are at increased risk of immune dysregulation and infectious complications. To attenuate the elevated proinflammatory cytokine levels and associated adverse clinical outcomes, it has been postulated that extracorporeal blood purification could improve the overall survival rate and morbidity of patients undergoing LVAD implantation.\nMethods: We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data of 15 patients who underwent LVAD implantation at our center between January 2021 and March 2022. Of these, 15 (100%) who received HeartMate 3™ (St. Jude Medical, Abbott, MN, USA) device were eligible. Intraoperatively, patients were single randomized 1:1:1 to three groups: group 1, patients who received Cytosorb therapy (n=5; installed in the CPB circuit); group 2, patients who received Jafron HA330 (n=5; installed in the CPB circuit); and control group 3, patients who did not receive filter (n=5; usual care, neither Cytosorb nor Jafron during CPB). Baseline patient characteristics and intraoperative data were compared between the groups. Blood sample analyses were performed to assess the levels of inflammatory markers (IL-1, 6, 8; CRP, Leukocyte, Lactate, PCT, NT-proBNP, TNF-α) in both preoperative and postoperative data.\nResults: Baseline patient characteristics were similar in all three groups. We found that IL1α; IL 6; IL8; Lactatedehydrogenase, PCT, pro-BNP, CRP; Leukocyte, and TNFα levels significantly increased with LVAD implantation and that neither Cytosorb nor Jafron influenced this response. In-hospital mortality and overall survival during follow-up were similar among the groups.\nConclusion: Our preliminary results showed that hemoadsorption therapy using Cytosorb or Jafron hemoadsorption (HA) 330 may not be clinically beneficial for patients with advanced heart failure undergoing LVAD implantation. Large prospective studies are needed to evaluate the potential role of HA therapy in improving outcomes in patients undergoing LVAD implantation.","PeriodicalId":309024,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology","volume":"98 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2023048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) candidates are at increased risk of immune dysregulation and infectious complications. To attenuate the elevated proinflammatory cytokine levels and associated adverse clinical outcomes, it has been postulated that extracorporeal blood purification could improve the overall survival rate and morbidity of patients undergoing LVAD implantation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data of 15 patients who underwent LVAD implantation at our center between January 2021 and March 2022. Of these, 15 (100%) who received HeartMate 3™ (St. Jude Medical, Abbott, MN, USA) device were eligible. Intraoperatively, patients were single randomized 1:1:1 to three groups: group 1, patients who received Cytosorb therapy (n=5; installed in the CPB circuit); group 2, patients who received Jafron HA330 (n=5; installed in the CPB circuit); and control group 3, patients who did not receive filter (n=5; usual care, neither Cytosorb nor Jafron during CPB). Baseline patient characteristics and intraoperative data were compared between the groups. Blood sample analyses were performed to assess the levels of inflammatory markers (IL-1, 6, 8; CRP, Leukocyte, Lactate, PCT, NT-proBNP, TNF-α) in both preoperative and postoperative data. Results: Baseline patient characteristics were similar in all three groups. We found that IL1α; IL 6; IL8; Lactatedehydrogenase, PCT, pro-BNP, CRP; Leukocyte, and TNFα levels significantly increased with LVAD implantation and that neither Cytosorb nor Jafron influenced this response. In-hospital mortality and overall survival during follow-up were similar among the groups. Conclusion: Our preliminary results showed that hemoadsorption therapy using Cytosorb or Jafron hemoadsorption (HA) 330 may not be clinically beneficial for patients with advanced heart failure undergoing LVAD implantation. Large prospective studies are needed to evaluate the potential role of HA therapy in improving outcomes in patients undergoing LVAD implantation.
接受 LVAD 患者体外血液净化治疗的初步报告:Cytosorb 或 Jafron HA330
背景:左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者出现免疫失调和感染并发症的风险增加。为了降低促炎细胞因子水平的升高和相关的不良临床结果,有人推测体外血液净化可以提高植入 LVAD 患者的总体存活率和发病率:我们回顾性分析了 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 3 月期间在本中心接受 LVAD 植入术的 15 名患者的前瞻性数据。其中,15 例(100%)患者接受了 HeartMate 3™ (St. Jude Medical,Abbott,MN,USA)装置。术中,患者按1:1:1的比例随机分为三组:第一组,接受Cytosorb治疗的患者(人数=5;安装在CPB回路中);第二组,接受Jafron HA330治疗的患者(人数=5;安装在CPB回路中);对照组3,未接受过滤器治疗的患者(人数=5;常规护理,CPB期间既不使用Cytosorb也不使用Jafron)。比较了各组患者的基线特征和术中数据。对血液样本进行分析,以评估术前和术后数据中炎症标志物(IL-1、6、8;CRP、白细胞、乳酸盐、PCT、NT-proBNP、TNF-α)的水平:三组患者的基线特征相似。我们发现,植入 LVAD 后,IL1α、IL 6、IL8、乳酸脱氢酶、PCT、pro-BNP、CRP、白细胞和 TNFα 水平显著升高,而 Cytosorb 和 Jafron 均未影响这一反应。两组患者的院内死亡率和随访期间的总生存率相似:我们的初步研究结果表明,使用 Cytosorb 或 Jafron 血液吸附(HA)330 对接受 LVAD 植入术的晚期心衰患者可能没有临床益处。需要进行大规模的前瞻性研究,以评估 HA疗法在改善左心室人工肾脏植入术患者预后方面的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信