Nurses Knowledge and Performance Toward Physical Restraint at Critical Care Units

Abbas Hamid
{"title":"Nurses Knowledge and Performance Toward Physical Restraint at Critical Care Units","authors":"Abbas Hamid","doi":"10.58897/injns.v36i1.686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"      Abstract: \nObjective: The study was done to evaluate nurses’ knowledge and practices toward physical restraint at critical care unit \nMethodology: Fifty nurses, who were selected by a non-probability (convenient) sampling method, participated in this descriptive study. The instrument of the study was knowledge parts of the questionnaire were initially developed in the U.S.A for nursing homes; in 2006 they were adopted for all hospital units by the original developers. The knowledge section of the questionnaire consisted of 20 items, which were used to measure knowledge of nurses towards the definition, indications and contraindications, proper application and legal and ethical considerations of physical restraint use. A three- point ordinal scale (Agree, Uncertain and Disagree) was applied to determine nurses’ responses to the items; it contained negative and positive sentences. Positive items, if answered with “agree,” were considered correct; if answered with “disagree,” items were considered incorrect. To evaluate the nurse's practices with respect to physical restraint, the researcher observes and checks for correct or incorrect performance. The practices checklist for nurses is composed of (94) items divided into six content domains. \nResults: The result of this research showed that 90% of nurses had low knowledge about physical restraint, and 80 % of the participants had unsatisfactory performance. \nRecommendation: The study recommended development of local policies for physical restraint use including detailed descriptions of conditions requiring its use is mandatory. \nKey words- Knowledge, Performance, Physical Restraint, Critical Care Units","PeriodicalId":488941,"journal":{"name":"Iraqi National Journal of Nursing Specialties","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iraqi National Journal of Nursing Specialties","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58897/injns.v36i1.686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

      Abstract: Objective: The study was done to evaluate nurses’ knowledge and practices toward physical restraint at critical care unit Methodology: Fifty nurses, who were selected by a non-probability (convenient) sampling method, participated in this descriptive study. The instrument of the study was knowledge parts of the questionnaire were initially developed in the U.S.A for nursing homes; in 2006 they were adopted for all hospital units by the original developers. The knowledge section of the questionnaire consisted of 20 items, which were used to measure knowledge of nurses towards the definition, indications and contraindications, proper application and legal and ethical considerations of physical restraint use. A three- point ordinal scale (Agree, Uncertain and Disagree) was applied to determine nurses’ responses to the items; it contained negative and positive sentences. Positive items, if answered with “agree,” were considered correct; if answered with “disagree,” items were considered incorrect. To evaluate the nurse's practices with respect to physical restraint, the researcher observes and checks for correct or incorrect performance. The practices checklist for nurses is composed of (94) items divided into six content domains. Results: The result of this research showed that 90% of nurses had low knowledge about physical restraint, and 80 % of the participants had unsatisfactory performance. Recommendation: The study recommended development of local policies for physical restraint use including detailed descriptions of conditions requiring its use is mandatory. Key words- Knowledge, Performance, Physical Restraint, Critical Care Units
重症监护病房护士对物理约束的认识和表现
摘要:目的本研究旨在评估重症监护室护士对物理约束的认识和实践方法:通过非概率(方便)抽样法选出 50 名护士参与这项描述性研究。研究工具是问卷的知识部分,最初是在美国为疗养院开发的;2006 年,最初的开发者将其用于所有医院单位。问卷的知识部分由 20 个项目组成,用于测量护士对使用物理约束的定义、适应症和禁忌症、正确应用以及法律和伦理方面的知识。采用三点顺序量表("同意"、"不确定 "和 "不同意")来确定护士对这些项目的回答;量表包含否定句和肯定句。积极的项目,如果回答 "同意",则视为正确;如果回答 "不同意",则视为不正确。为了评估护士在身体约束方面的做法,研究人员会观察并检查护士的表现是否正确。护士实践检查表由(94)个项目组成,分为六个内容领域。结果显示研究结果表明,90% 的护士对身体约束的了解较少,80% 的参与者表现不佳。建议:研究建议制定当地的物理约束使用政策,包括必须使用物理约束的条件的详细说明。关键词: 知识;表现;物理约束;重症监护病房
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信