Prospective use of O-RADS and ADNEX ultrasound systems for risk stratification of ovarian malignancies

M. N. Bulanov
{"title":"Prospective use of O-RADS and ADNEX ultrasound systems for risk stratification of ovarian malignancies","authors":"M. N. Bulanov","doi":"10.24835/1607-0771-2023-1-23-55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives. A prospective study of the diagnostic value of ultrasound ovarian cancer risk stratification systems ADNEX and O-RADS in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors.Material and methods. 59 patients with 43 benign and 25 with malignant ovarian tumors were prospectively examined. The ultrasound diagnostic systems IOTA ADNEX (installed on the device) and O-RADS (ACR Guidance smartphone application) were used to assess the risk of ovarian cancer. An ultrasound report on the presence of a malignant tumor with appropriate routing of the patient was given when the risk of malignancy according to ADNEX was ≥10%, as well as when the risk of malignancy was ≥4 points according to O-RADS. All patients underwent surgical treatment at the Regional Clinical Hospital (Vladimir) and the Regional Clinical Oncology Hospital (Vladimir).Results. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) were respectively for ADNEX: 96, 81, 75, 97 and 87%, AUC 0.933; for O-RADS: 100, 74, 69, 10% and 90%, AUC 0.926.Conclusion. Both ultrasound diagnostic systems demonstrated very high sensitivity in the prospective differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors. At the same time, O-RADS made it possible to make the correct diagnosis in all 25 cases of malignant tumors. At the same time, both systems showed low specificity, with ADNEX having a slightly higher specificity (p > 0.05). AUC values were high for both diagnostic systems. In connection with the results of the study, we currently consider it advisable to simultaneously use the ADNEX and O-RADS systems for ultrasound examination in gynecology, reflecting the results of calculating the risk of malignant neoplasms of the adnexal mass in the ultrasound examination protocol","PeriodicalId":291055,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound & Functional Diagnostics","volume":"78 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound & Functional Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0771-2023-1-23-55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. A prospective study of the diagnostic value of ultrasound ovarian cancer risk stratification systems ADNEX and O-RADS in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors.Material and methods. 59 patients with 43 benign and 25 with malignant ovarian tumors were prospectively examined. The ultrasound diagnostic systems IOTA ADNEX (installed on the device) and O-RADS (ACR Guidance smartphone application) were used to assess the risk of ovarian cancer. An ultrasound report on the presence of a malignant tumor with appropriate routing of the patient was given when the risk of malignancy according to ADNEX was ≥10%, as well as when the risk of malignancy was ≥4 points according to O-RADS. All patients underwent surgical treatment at the Regional Clinical Hospital (Vladimir) and the Regional Clinical Oncology Hospital (Vladimir).Results. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) were respectively for ADNEX: 96, 81, 75, 97 and 87%, AUC 0.933; for O-RADS: 100, 74, 69, 10% and 90%, AUC 0.926.Conclusion. Both ultrasound diagnostic systems demonstrated very high sensitivity in the prospective differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors. At the same time, O-RADS made it possible to make the correct diagnosis in all 25 cases of malignant tumors. At the same time, both systems showed low specificity, with ADNEX having a slightly higher specificity (p > 0.05). AUC values were high for both diagnostic systems. In connection with the results of the study, we currently consider it advisable to simultaneously use the ADNEX and O-RADS systems for ultrasound examination in gynecology, reflecting the results of calculating the risk of malignant neoplasms of the adnexal mass in the ultrasound examination protocol
前瞻性使用 O-RADS 和 ADNEX 超声系统对卵巢恶性肿瘤进行风险分层
目的前瞻性研究超声卵巢癌风险分层系统 ADNEX 和 O-RADS 在鉴别诊断良性和恶性卵巢肿瘤中的诊断价值。对 59 名患者进行了前瞻性检查,其中 43 名为良性卵巢肿瘤,25 名为恶性卵巢肿瘤。超声诊断系统 IOTA ADNEX(安装在设备上)和 O-RADS(ACR 指导智能手机应用程序)用于评估卵巢癌的风险。当 ADNEX 预测的恶性肿瘤风险≥10%,以及 O-RADS 预测的恶性肿瘤风险≥4 点时,就会给出恶性肿瘤的超声波报告,并对患者进行适当的常规治疗。所有患者均在地区临床医院(弗拉基米尔)和地区临床肿瘤医院(弗拉基米尔)接受手术治疗。ADNEX的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、准确性和曲线下面积(AUC)分别为96%、81%、75%、97%和87%,AUC为0.933;O-RADS的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、准确性和曲线下面积(AUC)分别为100%、74%、69%、10%和10%:结论。两种超声诊断系统在良性和恶性卵巢肿瘤的前瞻性鉴别诊断中都表现出极高的灵敏度。同时,O-RADS 能对所有 25 例恶性肿瘤做出正确诊断。同时,两种系统的特异性都很低,ADNEX的特异性略高(P > 0.05)。两种诊断系统的 AUC 值都很高。根据研究结果,我们目前认为在妇科超声检查中同时使用 ADNEX 和 O-RADS 系统是可取的,这反映了在超声检查方案中计算附件肿块恶性肿瘤风险的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信