Alternative to Big Bang Requires Seemingly Impossible Physics

IPI Letters Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI:10.59973/ipil.38
Rodney Bartlett
{"title":"Alternative to Big Bang Requires Seemingly Impossible Physics","authors":"Rodney Bartlett","doi":"10.59973/ipil.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is there a reasonable alternative to the theory of the expanding universe? The idea of an eternal universe is highly speculative and doesn't quite fit with our current understanding of the universe's origins, such as the Big Bang theory. Any idea that has been around for a century cannot be easily dismissed but the James Webb Space Telescope is casting potential doubts on the Big Bang. If this continues, we may well find ourselves in need of another theory explaining cosmic origins. This submission begins with the “advanced” waves that aren’t scientifically popular because they travel back in time and seem to violate the laws of cause and effect. However, the Nobel-winning physicist Richard Feynman loved them and used them to explain antimatter. And this submission will propose that all time in the past, present, and future is united into one thing and causality need not be considered a problem. It then uses readshift, aka re(tarded)-ad(vanced) shift, to suggest the universe is static and supports that conclusion by a revision of electromagnetism which, thanks to George Yuri Rainich, includes gravitation. This is followed by an alternative to the Big Bang where, seemingly impossibly, the infinite and eternal universe is created using pi, imaginary time, virtual reality, augmented reality, quantum and macroscopic entanglement. Finally, to better explain the unification of everything in time and space, is a shortened section on what is called vector-tensor-scalar geometry which talks about the Higgs boson/field and was inspired by a 1919 paper published by Albert Einstein.","PeriodicalId":358655,"journal":{"name":"IPI Letters","volume":"135 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IPI Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59973/ipil.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Is there a reasonable alternative to the theory of the expanding universe? The idea of an eternal universe is highly speculative and doesn't quite fit with our current understanding of the universe's origins, such as the Big Bang theory. Any idea that has been around for a century cannot be easily dismissed but the James Webb Space Telescope is casting potential doubts on the Big Bang. If this continues, we may well find ourselves in need of another theory explaining cosmic origins. This submission begins with the “advanced” waves that aren’t scientifically popular because they travel back in time and seem to violate the laws of cause and effect. However, the Nobel-winning physicist Richard Feynman loved them and used them to explain antimatter. And this submission will propose that all time in the past, present, and future is united into one thing and causality need not be considered a problem. It then uses readshift, aka re(tarded)-ad(vanced) shift, to suggest the universe is static and supports that conclusion by a revision of electromagnetism which, thanks to George Yuri Rainich, includes gravitation. This is followed by an alternative to the Big Bang where, seemingly impossibly, the infinite and eternal universe is created using pi, imaginary time, virtual reality, augmented reality, quantum and macroscopic entanglement. Finally, to better explain the unification of everything in time and space, is a shortened section on what is called vector-tensor-scalar geometry which talks about the Higgs boson/field and was inspired by a 1919 paper published by Albert Einstein.
大爆炸的替代方案需要看似不可能的物理学
宇宙膨胀理论有合理的替代方案吗?永恒宇宙的想法是高度推测性的,与我们目前对宇宙起源的理解(如大爆炸理论)不太相符。任何已经存在了一个世纪的观点都不能被轻易否定,但詹姆斯-韦伯太空望远镜却对宇宙大爆炸提出了潜在的质疑。如果这种情况继续下去,我们很可能会发现自己需要另一种理论来解释宇宙起源。这篇论文从 "高级 "波开始,这种波在科学上并不流行,因为它们可以穿越时空,似乎违反了因果法则。然而,诺贝尔物理学奖得主理查德-费曼(Richard Feynman)却非常喜欢它们,并用它们来解释反物质。而这篇论文将提出,过去、现在和未来的所有时间都是统一的,因果关系无需考虑。然后,它利用 "读移"(又称 "后移")来说明宇宙是静态的,并通过对电磁学的修正来支持这一结论,由于乔治-尤里-雷尼奇(George Yuri Rainich)的努力,电磁学还包括了引力。随后,他提出了宇宙大爆炸的替代方案,利用π、虚时间、虚拟现实、增强现实、量子和宏观纠缠,创造了无限和永恒的宇宙,这似乎是不可能的。最后,为了更好地解释万物在时间和空间上的统一,我们简要介绍了所谓的矢量-张量-标量几何,其中谈到了希格斯玻色子/场,其灵感来自阿尔伯特-爱因斯坦 1919 年发表的一篇论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信