Corrigendum to Article ‘A Paradigm Shift in the Role of Courts? Disappearance of Judicial Review through Mutual Trust and other Neofunctionalist Tenets of EU Law’

Anneli Albi
{"title":"Corrigendum to Article ‘A Paradigm Shift in the Role of Courts? Disappearance of Judicial Review through Mutual Trust and other Neofunctionalist Tenets of EU Law’","authors":"Anneli Albi","doi":"10.12697/ji.2023.32.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Published in: Juridica International, 31/2022, pp.\n3–47. [link]\n/DOI:https://doi.org/10.12697/JI.2022.31.01/\nThe author has made the following correction to the above\narticle. On page 35, line 3, ‘measure’ has been replaced by ‘directive’. Thus,\nthe corrected sentence reads as follows:\n‘The widely contested EU Data Retention Directive was only the\nsecond ever directive to be annulled by the CJEU – in 2014 – on fundamental\nrights grounds; this came in a second challenge following extensive national\nconstitutional contestation.’\n\n\nThe article has been updated to reflect this.\n\n\nThe author apologises for the error.\n","PeriodicalId":55758,"journal":{"name":"Juridica International","volume":"76 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridica International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12697/ji.2023.32.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Published in: Juridica International, 31/2022, pp. 3–47. [link] /DOI:https://doi.org/10.12697/JI.2022.31.01/ The author has made the following correction to the above article. On page 35, line 3, ‘measure’ has been replaced by ‘directive’. Thus, the corrected sentence reads as follows: ‘The widely contested EU Data Retention Directive was only the second ever directive to be annulled by the CJEU – in 2014 – on fundamental rights grounds; this came in a second challenge following extensive national constitutional contestation.’ The article has been updated to reflect this. The author apologises for the error.
法院角色的范式转变?通过相互信任和欧盟法律的其他新功能主义原则实现司法审查的消失
发表于Juridica International, 31/2022, pp.3-47。[link]/DOI:https://doi.org/10.12697/JI.2022.31.01/The 作者对上述文章作了如下更正。第 35 页,第 3 行,"措施 "改为 "指令"。因此,更正后的句子如下:"广受争议的《欧盟数据保留指令》是 2014 年欧盟法院以基本权利为由废除的第二项指令;这是在广泛的国家宪法争议之后的第二次挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信