Corrigendum to Article ‘A Paradigm Shift in the Role of Courts? Disappearance of Judicial Review through Mutual Trust and other Neofunctionalist Tenets of EU Law’
{"title":"Corrigendum to Article ‘A Paradigm Shift in the Role of Courts? Disappearance of Judicial Review through Mutual Trust and other Neofunctionalist Tenets of EU Law’","authors":"Anneli Albi","doi":"10.12697/ji.2023.32.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Published in: Juridica International, 31/2022, pp.\n3–47. [link]\n/DOI:https://doi.org/10.12697/JI.2022.31.01/\nThe author has made the following correction to the above\narticle. On page 35, line 3, ‘measure’ has been replaced by ‘directive’. Thus,\nthe corrected sentence reads as follows:\n‘The widely contested EU Data Retention Directive was only the\nsecond ever directive to be annulled by the CJEU – in 2014 – on fundamental\nrights grounds; this came in a second challenge following extensive national\nconstitutional contestation.’\n\n\nThe article has been updated to reflect this.\n\n\nThe author apologises for the error.\n","PeriodicalId":55758,"journal":{"name":"Juridica International","volume":"76 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridica International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12697/ji.2023.32.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Published in: Juridica International, 31/2022, pp.
3–47. [link]
/DOI:https://doi.org/10.12697/JI.2022.31.01/
The author has made the following correction to the above
article. On page 35, line 3, ‘measure’ has been replaced by ‘directive’. Thus,
the corrected sentence reads as follows:
‘The widely contested EU Data Retention Directive was only the
second ever directive to be annulled by the CJEU – in 2014 – on fundamental
rights grounds; this came in a second challenge following extensive national
constitutional contestation.’
The article has been updated to reflect this.
The author apologises for the error.