Idiographic assessment of attachment relationships: Construction and validation of scales for use in narrative psychotherapy

Rolf Van Geel, T. Houtmans, Mathijs Van der Zande
{"title":"Idiographic assessment of attachment relationships: Construction and validation of scales for use in narrative psychotherapy","authors":"Rolf Van Geel, T. Houtmans, Mathijs Van der Zande","doi":"10.21827/ijpp.9.41057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study the focus was on the development and validation of scales that can be used in an attachment-based narrative form of psychotherapy/counseling. One hundred and six participants completed an online survey, in which they were asked to select one significant troublesome relationship (past or present), to describe the nature of this relationship in a couple of sentences and to characterize the relationship by means of the list of 49 attachment items. By employing exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (N = 106), a six-factor model emerged covering four classical attachment prototypes: (I) security; (II) anxiety (preoccupation with relationships, fear of rejection); (III) dismissive avoidance (i.e., defensive separation/denial of attachment need; and (IV) fearful avoidance (avoidance/alienation, threat). In two validation studies, the interpersonal and affective meaning of these scales were examined by using instruments that accentuate agentic and communal interpersonal orientations in human contact. In a subsequent qualitative study, we used a cluster-based classification into attachment groups for the exhaustive screening of the content of (a selection of) 40 texts of 40 persons. This hermeneutic approach disclosed characteristic themes for each of the secure, preoccupied, dismissive-avoidant and fearful-avoidant prototypes which are discussed in detail. In narrative psychotherapy a thematic overview according to the attachment typology may be helpful in fine-tuning the therapeutic process, in that it may increase a client’s awareness of attachment issues and associated (dysfunctional) emotional reactions.\n ","PeriodicalId":91096,"journal":{"name":"International journal of personality psychology","volume":"45 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of personality psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21827/ijpp.9.41057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study the focus was on the development and validation of scales that can be used in an attachment-based narrative form of psychotherapy/counseling. One hundred and six participants completed an online survey, in which they were asked to select one significant troublesome relationship (past or present), to describe the nature of this relationship in a couple of sentences and to characterize the relationship by means of the list of 49 attachment items. By employing exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (N = 106), a six-factor model emerged covering four classical attachment prototypes: (I) security; (II) anxiety (preoccupation with relationships, fear of rejection); (III) dismissive avoidance (i.e., defensive separation/denial of attachment need; and (IV) fearful avoidance (avoidance/alienation, threat). In two validation studies, the interpersonal and affective meaning of these scales were examined by using instruments that accentuate agentic and communal interpersonal orientations in human contact. In a subsequent qualitative study, we used a cluster-based classification into attachment groups for the exhaustive screening of the content of (a selection of) 40 texts of 40 persons. This hermeneutic approach disclosed characteristic themes for each of the secure, preoccupied, dismissive-avoidant and fearful-avoidant prototypes which are discussed in detail. In narrative psychotherapy a thematic overview according to the attachment typology may be helpful in fine-tuning the therapeutic process, in that it may increase a client’s awareness of attachment issues and associated (dysfunctional) emotional reactions.  
依恋关系的图像评估:构建和验证用于叙事心理疗法的量表
本研究的重点是开发和验证可用于以依恋为基础的叙事形式心理治疗/咨询的量表。16 名参与者完成了一项在线调查,调查要求他们选择一种重要的麻烦关系(过去或现在),用几句话描述这种关系的性质,并通过 49 个依恋项目来描述这种关系的特征。通过探索性和确认性因素分析(N=106),一个涵盖四种经典依恋原型的六因素模型出现了:(I)安全感;(II)焦虑(对人际关系的专注,害怕被拒绝);(III)轻视性回避(即防御性分离/否认依恋需求);以及(IV)恐惧性回避(回避/疏远,威胁)。在两项验证研究中,我们使用了在人际交往中强调代理和共同人际取向的工具,对这些量表的人际和情感意义进行了检验。在随后进行的一项定性研究中,我们采用了依恋群组分类法,对 40 人的 40 篇文章(精选)内容进行了详尽的筛选。这种诠释方法揭示了安全型、先入为主型、轻视回避型和恐惧回避型每种原型的特征主题,我们将对这些主题进行详细讨论。在叙事心理治疗中,根据依恋类型学对主题进行概述可能有助于对治疗过程进行微调,因为它可以提高客户对依恋问题和相关(功能失调)情绪反应的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信