Secret Audio and Video Recording as a Criminal Offense and Exceptions From Illegality: Standards, Practice and “Strasbourg” Standards

Davor Trlin, Mila Čolić
{"title":"Secret Audio and Video Recording as a Criminal Offense and Exceptions From Illegality: Standards, Practice and “Strasbourg” Standards","authors":"Davor Trlin, Mila Čolić","doi":"10.51235/kt.2023.23.1-2.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The criminal legislation in Bosnia and Herzegovina contains an impressive number of criminal offenses, among which is the illegal making of secret audio and video recordings, which has recently attracted a lot of public attention. In this paper, we will try to answer the question of whether it is sometimes permissible to make secret audio and video recordings, and if the answer is yes when it is possible. We will seek an answer to that question with the help of research methods of the normative framework, domestic judicial practice, comparative judicial practice, and the practice of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg and its public interest construct. We will also present several decisions of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina and regular courts in Bosnia and Herzegovina so that we can conclude whether and to what extent the \"Strasbourg\" standards are respected in the application of the law by the domestic judiciary. We will also compare normative solutions from Bosnia and Herzegovina with the same or similar ones from neighboring countries, specifically the Republic of Croatia and the Republic of Serbia, which inherit the same, Yugoslav legal system, and like Bosnia and Herzegovina are passing (Republic of Serbia) or have largely passed (Republic Croatia) process of harmonizing national legislation with the law of the European Union and the law of the Council of Europe.","PeriodicalId":375468,"journal":{"name":"Kriminalističke teme","volume":"112 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kriminalističke teme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51235/kt.2023.23.1-2.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The criminal legislation in Bosnia and Herzegovina contains an impressive number of criminal offenses, among which is the illegal making of secret audio and video recordings, which has recently attracted a lot of public attention. In this paper, we will try to answer the question of whether it is sometimes permissible to make secret audio and video recordings, and if the answer is yes when it is possible. We will seek an answer to that question with the help of research methods of the normative framework, domestic judicial practice, comparative judicial practice, and the practice of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg and its public interest construct. We will also present several decisions of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina and regular courts in Bosnia and Herzegovina so that we can conclude whether and to what extent the "Strasbourg" standards are respected in the application of the law by the domestic judiciary. We will also compare normative solutions from Bosnia and Herzegovina with the same or similar ones from neighboring countries, specifically the Republic of Croatia and the Republic of Serbia, which inherit the same, Yugoslav legal system, and like Bosnia and Herzegovina are passing (Republic of Serbia) or have largely passed (Republic Croatia) process of harmonizing national legislation with the law of the European Union and the law of the Council of Europe.
作为刑事犯罪的秘密录音和录像以及非法性的例外情况:标准、实践和 "斯特拉斯堡 "标准
波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的刑事立法包含大量刑事犯罪,其中非法进行秘密录音和录像最近引起了公众的广泛关注。在本文中,我们将试图回答这样一个问题:有时是否允许秘密录音和录像?我们将借助对规范框架、国内司法实践、比较司法实践、斯特拉斯堡欧洲人权法院的实践及其公共利益建构的研究方法来寻求这一问题的答案。我们还将介绍波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那宪法法院以及波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那普通法院的若干判决,从而得出国内司法机构在适用法律时是否以及在多大程度上遵守了 "斯特拉斯堡 "标准的结论。我们还将把波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的规范性解决方案与邻国,特别是克罗地亚共和国和塞尔维亚共和国的相同或类似解决方案进行比较,这两个国家继承了相同的南斯拉夫法律体系,并且与波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那一样,正在经历(塞尔维亚共和国)或已基本经历(克罗地亚共和国)将国家立法与欧洲联盟法律和欧洲委员会法律相协调的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信