Evidence-based decision-making in speech-language pathology via video-based telepractice—A qualitative video interaction analysis

IF 1.5 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Maria Barthel, Silke Wittmar, Bernhard Borgetto, Juliane Leinweber
{"title":"Evidence-based decision-making in speech-language pathology via video-based telepractice—A qualitative video interaction analysis","authors":"Maria Barthel, Silke Wittmar, Bernhard Borgetto, Juliane Leinweber","doi":"10.3389/fcomm.2023.1176473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In speech-language pathology, there is a constant need to make evidence-based decisions based on the patient's needs and goals, speech-language pathologist's clinical expertise, and external evidence. During the COVID-19 pandemic, it was possible for the first time in Germany to implement video-based telepractice in the outpatient care of speech-language pathology. This study aimed to find out how evidence-based decisions are made in video-based telepractice and what forms of evidence are used.Speech-language pathologists who were working in outpatient services recorded their video-based telepractices for the research project. Five recorded video-based telepractices were transcribed using a simple transcription system and video interaction analysis was used to analyze the video recordings based on grounded theory methodology.Interactions between patients and speech-language pathologists are characterized by evidence-based decisions that can be observed. Speech-language pathologists make decisions based on their clinical expertise, patient-related experiences, and patient self-assessments. There is little evidence of negotiation between patients and speech-language pathologists to make joint decisions. Results showed that speech-language pathologists do not explicitly name external evidence to justify their decisions to patients. Shared decision-making is encouraged by a participative interaction between patients and speech-language pathologists. However, there was a predominant paternalistic interaction in which the speech-language pathologists made decisions on their own. To represent the decision-based interactions between patients and speech-language pathologists in a video-based therapy session, a process model was developed.Evidence-based and shared decision-making are important in speech-language pathology to provide patient-centered treatments. The exchange of information between the patient and the speech-language pathologist is important in order to make joint decisions based on these different levels of knowledge. In this way, the patient becomes an active participant in the digital treatment, in the video-based telepractice. As a result, the quality of care can be improved. Further research should reconstruct the implicit (possible) use of external evidence.","PeriodicalId":31739,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Communication","volume":"4 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1176473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In speech-language pathology, there is a constant need to make evidence-based decisions based on the patient's needs and goals, speech-language pathologist's clinical expertise, and external evidence. During the COVID-19 pandemic, it was possible for the first time in Germany to implement video-based telepractice in the outpatient care of speech-language pathology. This study aimed to find out how evidence-based decisions are made in video-based telepractice and what forms of evidence are used.Speech-language pathologists who were working in outpatient services recorded their video-based telepractices for the research project. Five recorded video-based telepractices were transcribed using a simple transcription system and video interaction analysis was used to analyze the video recordings based on grounded theory methodology.Interactions between patients and speech-language pathologists are characterized by evidence-based decisions that can be observed. Speech-language pathologists make decisions based on their clinical expertise, patient-related experiences, and patient self-assessments. There is little evidence of negotiation between patients and speech-language pathologists to make joint decisions. Results showed that speech-language pathologists do not explicitly name external evidence to justify their decisions to patients. Shared decision-making is encouraged by a participative interaction between patients and speech-language pathologists. However, there was a predominant paternalistic interaction in which the speech-language pathologists made decisions on their own. To represent the decision-based interactions between patients and speech-language pathologists in a video-based therapy session, a process model was developed.Evidence-based and shared decision-making are important in speech-language pathology to provide patient-centered treatments. The exchange of information between the patient and the speech-language pathologist is important in order to make joint decisions based on these different levels of knowledge. In this way, the patient becomes an active participant in the digital treatment, in the video-based telepractice. As a result, the quality of care can be improved. Further research should reconstruct the implicit (possible) use of external evidence.
通过基于视频的远程诊疗在言语病理学中进行循证决策--视频互动定性分析
在言语病理学领域,始终需要根据患者的需求和目标、言语病理学家的临床专业知识以及外部证据做出循证决策。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,德国首次在言语病理学门诊护理中实施了基于视频的远程实践。这项研究旨在了解在视频远程实践中如何做出循证决策,以及使用了哪些形式的证据。在门诊服务中工作的言语病理学家为研究项目录制了他们的视频远程实践。使用简单的转录系统对录制的五次远程诊疗视频进行转录,并根据基础理论方法对视频记录进行视频交互分析。言语病理学家根据其临床专业知识、患者相关经验和患者自我评估做出决定。很少有证据表明患者与言语病理学家通过协商共同做出决定。结果表明,言语病理学家不会明确指出外部证据来向患者证明其决策的合理性。患者与言语病理学家之间的参与式互动鼓励共同决策。然而,在家长式的互动中,语言病理学家自行做出决定的情况占主导地位。为了体现患者与言语病理学家在视频治疗过程中基于决策的互动,我们建立了一个过程模型。在言语病理学中,基于证据和共同决策对于提供以患者为中心的治疗非常重要。患者与言语病理学家之间的信息交流非常重要,这样才能根据这些不同层次的知识做出共同决策。这样,患者就成为视频远程诊疗数字化治疗的积极参与者。因此,护理质量可以得到提高。进一步的研究应重新构建外部证据的隐性(可能)使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
284
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信