Investigating Chinese Tertiary EFL Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices in the Application of Learning Management Systems Using Q Methodology

IF 0.6 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Yanjing Qi, Rohani Binti Othman
{"title":"Investigating Chinese Tertiary EFL Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices in the Application of Learning Management Systems Using Q Methodology","authors":"Yanjing Qi, Rohani Binti Othman","doi":"10.24093/awej/vol14no4.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to explore Chinese tertiary EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices as well as the relationships between them in the application of Learning Management Systems (LMS in short). By reviewing relevant literature, previous studies either carried out research on teachers’ beliefs and practices in the training of basic English learning skills or compared them between novice and experienced teachers. This study fills the gap of research on teachers’ beliefs and practices from the perspective of technology integration, specifically LMS application. By using the Q methodology, 38 EFL teachers teaching the same EFL course to undergraduate students at F University in mainland China were selected as research participants. After collecting research data through open-ended questionnaires and semi-structured interviews, four different types of teachers’ LMS beliefs and three different levels of teachers’ LMS practices were identified by employing Q Methodology software-PQMethod and a web application Ken-Q analysis. Through comparing each participant’s corresponding beliefs and practices, both consistent and inconsistent relationships are found. The research findings not only prove the definite connection between teachers’ LMS beliefs and practices but also reveal the discrepancies between what teachers believe and do while using LMS. In general, The research can not only offer a new methodological solution for further research on cognitive factors like teachers’ beliefs but also provide pedagogical implications to EFL teachers to promote their career development.","PeriodicalId":45153,"journal":{"name":"Arab World English Journal","volume":"70 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab World English Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no4.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore Chinese tertiary EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices as well as the relationships between them in the application of Learning Management Systems (LMS in short). By reviewing relevant literature, previous studies either carried out research on teachers’ beliefs and practices in the training of basic English learning skills or compared them between novice and experienced teachers. This study fills the gap of research on teachers’ beliefs and practices from the perspective of technology integration, specifically LMS application. By using the Q methodology, 38 EFL teachers teaching the same EFL course to undergraduate students at F University in mainland China were selected as research participants. After collecting research data through open-ended questionnaires and semi-structured interviews, four different types of teachers’ LMS beliefs and three different levels of teachers’ LMS practices were identified by employing Q Methodology software-PQMethod and a web application Ken-Q analysis. Through comparing each participant’s corresponding beliefs and practices, both consistent and inconsistent relationships are found. The research findings not only prove the definite connection between teachers’ LMS beliefs and practices but also reveal the discrepancies between what teachers believe and do while using LMS. In general, The research can not only offer a new methodological solution for further research on cognitive factors like teachers’ beliefs but also provide pedagogical implications to EFL teachers to promote their career development.
用 Q 方法调查中国高等院校 EFL 教师应用学习管理系统的信念和实践
本研究旨在探讨中国高等院校英语教师在应用学习管理系统(简称LMS)过程中的信念和实践以及它们之间的关系。通过查阅相关文献,以往的研究要么是对教师在英语学习基本技能训练中的信念和实践进行研究,要么是对新手教师和经验丰富的教师的信念和实践进行比较。本研究填补了从技术整合(特别是 LMS 应用)的角度对教师的信念和实践进行研究的空白。本研究采用Q法,选取了中国大陆F大学为本科生教授同一门EFL课程的38名EFL教师作为研究对象。通过开放式问卷和半结构式访谈收集研究数据后,利用Q方法软件--QMethod和网络应用Ken-Q分析,确定了四种不同类型的教师LMS信念和三种不同层次的教师LMS实践。通过比较每位参与者相应的信念和实践,发现了一致和不一致的关系。研究结果不仅证明了教师的学习管理系统信念与实践之间的明确联系,也揭示了教师在使用学习管理系统时信念与实践之间的差异。总之,本研究不仅能为进一步研究教师信念等认知因素提供新的方法论方案,还能为促进 EFL 教师的职业发展提供教学启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arab World English Journal
Arab World English Journal LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
30.00%
发文量
187
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信