Emotions and Information Diffusion on Social Media: A Replication in the Context of Political Communication on Twitter

Linus Hagemann, Olga Abramova
{"title":"Emotions and Information Diffusion on Social Media: A Replication in the Context of Political Communication on Twitter","authors":"Linus Hagemann, Olga Abramova","doi":"10.17705/1atrr.00079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a methodological and conceptual replication of Stieglitz and Dang-Xuan’s (2013) investigation of the role of sentiment in information-sharing behavior on social media. Whereas Stieglitz and Dang-Xuan (2013) focused on Twitter communication prior to the state parliament elections in the German states Baden-Wurttemberg, Rheinland-Pfalz, and Berlin in 2011, we test their theoretical propositions in the context of the state parliament elections in Saxony-Anhalt (Germany) 2021. We confirm the positive link between sentiment in a political Twitter message and its number of retweets in a methodological replication. In a conceptual replication, where sentiment was assessed with the alternative dictionary-based tool LIWC, the sentiment was negatively associated with the retweet volume. In line with the original study, the strength of association between sentiment and retweet time lag insignificantly differs between tweets with negative sentiment and tweets with positive sentiment. We also found that the number of an author’s followers was an essential determinant of sharing behavior. However, two hypotheses supported in the original study did not hold for our sample. Precisely, the total amount of sentiments was insignificantly linked to the time lag to the first retweet. Finally, in our data, we do not observe that the association between the overall sentiment and retweet quantity is stronger for tweets with negative sentiment than for those with positive sentiment.","PeriodicalId":193731,"journal":{"name":"AIS Transactions on Replication Research","volume":"208 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIS Transactions on Replication Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17705/1atrr.00079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a methodological and conceptual replication of Stieglitz and Dang-Xuan’s (2013) investigation of the role of sentiment in information-sharing behavior on social media. Whereas Stieglitz and Dang-Xuan (2013) focused on Twitter communication prior to the state parliament elections in the German states Baden-Wurttemberg, Rheinland-Pfalz, and Berlin in 2011, we test their theoretical propositions in the context of the state parliament elections in Saxony-Anhalt (Germany) 2021. We confirm the positive link between sentiment in a political Twitter message and its number of retweets in a methodological replication. In a conceptual replication, where sentiment was assessed with the alternative dictionary-based tool LIWC, the sentiment was negatively associated with the retweet volume. In line with the original study, the strength of association between sentiment and retweet time lag insignificantly differs between tweets with negative sentiment and tweets with positive sentiment. We also found that the number of an author’s followers was an essential determinant of sharing behavior. However, two hypotheses supported in the original study did not hold for our sample. Precisely, the total amount of sentiments was insignificantly linked to the time lag to the first retweet. Finally, in our data, we do not observe that the association between the overall sentiment and retweet quantity is stronger for tweets with negative sentiment than for those with positive sentiment.
社交媒体上的情感与信息扩散:推特政治传播背景下的再现
本文从方法论和概念上复制了 Stieglitz 和 Dang-Xuan(2013 年)关于情绪在社交媒体信息分享行为中的作用的研究。Stieglitz 和 Dang-Xuan(2013 年)的研究重点是 2011 年德国巴登-符腾堡州、莱茵兰-普法尔茨州和柏林州州议会选举前的推特传播,而我们则在 2021 年德国萨克森-安哈尔特州州议会选举的背景下检验了他们的理论命题。在方法复制中,我们证实了政治推特信息中的情感与其转发数量之间的正向联系。在概念复制中,我们使用基于词典的工具 LIWC 对情感进行了评估,结果发现情感与转发量呈负相关。与最初的研究结果一致,情感与转发时滞之间的关联强度在情感消极的推文与情感积极的推文之间没有显著差异。我们还发现,作者的粉丝数量是决定分享行为的重要因素。然而,原始研究中支持的两个假设在我们的样本中并不成立。确切地说,情感总量与首次转发的时滞之间的关系并不显著。最后,在我们的数据中,我们没有观察到负面情绪的推文比正面情绪的推文在整体情绪和转发量之间有更强的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信