Effectiveness of Educational Interventions to Improve Knowledge and Medication Adherence for People with Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Noor Cahaya, S. A. Kristina, Anna Wahyuni Widayanti, James A Green
{"title":"Effectiveness of Educational Interventions to Improve Knowledge and Medication Adherence for People with Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review","authors":"Noor Cahaya, S. A. Kristina, Anna Wahyuni Widayanti, James A Green","doi":"10.22146/ijp.4768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Not only antipsychotics but additional interventions such as education for people with schizophrenia are also needed to support optimal therapy. Studies with educational interventions have been conducted and show varied outcomes. The systematic review aimed to summarize and evaluate the effectiveness of studies regarding educational interventions for people with schizophrenia. Two electronic databases (PubMed and Science Direct) were used to find studies with criteria that were educational interventions for people with schizophrenia and focused on outcome measures related to improving knowledge, medication adherence, and other outcomes as an effect of educational interventions, randomized or randomized controlled trial studies, published between 2012 and 2022. The manual search of referenced articles was also applied. A literature search was conducted using the terms (\"people with schizophrenia\" OR \"patients with schizophrenia\") AND (\"education\" OR \"knowledge\") AND (\"medication adherence\" OR \"medication compliance\" OR \"medication persistence\"). Of the 666 studies, seven were eligible. Some educational interventions are part of a therapy program, while others are full psychoeducational programs that target not only the patient but also the patient's family. There was only one study that used counseling supported by leaflets delivered by a pharmacist. Another intervention used face-to-face interviews and discussions supplemented by modules or booklets, or giving booklets to patients and then following up by phone. Only one of the seven studies was effective in increasing patient knowledge. The rest did not measure knowledge but assessed other parameters, i.e., stigma and insight, symptoms, social functioning, relapse rate, or quality of life as the effect of educational intervention. Three studies showed a significant difference in improvement in medication adherence between the intervention and control groups; two studies were not significant, and the rest were unmeasured. It can be concluded that educational intervention had a positive effect on PwS and their families’ knowledge, improved medication adherence, and other outcomes as an effect of the educational intervention.","PeriodicalId":13520,"journal":{"name":"INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY","volume":"85 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/ijp.4768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Not only antipsychotics but additional interventions such as education for people with schizophrenia are also needed to support optimal therapy. Studies with educational interventions have been conducted and show varied outcomes. The systematic review aimed to summarize and evaluate the effectiveness of studies regarding educational interventions for people with schizophrenia. Two electronic databases (PubMed and Science Direct) were used to find studies with criteria that were educational interventions for people with schizophrenia and focused on outcome measures related to improving knowledge, medication adherence, and other outcomes as an effect of educational interventions, randomized or randomized controlled trial studies, published between 2012 and 2022. The manual search of referenced articles was also applied. A literature search was conducted using the terms ("people with schizophrenia" OR "patients with schizophrenia") AND ("education" OR "knowledge") AND ("medication adherence" OR "medication compliance" OR "medication persistence"). Of the 666 studies, seven were eligible. Some educational interventions are part of a therapy program, while others are full psychoeducational programs that target not only the patient but also the patient's family. There was only one study that used counseling supported by leaflets delivered by a pharmacist. Another intervention used face-to-face interviews and discussions supplemented by modules or booklets, or giving booklets to patients and then following up by phone. Only one of the seven studies was effective in increasing patient knowledge. The rest did not measure knowledge but assessed other parameters, i.e., stigma and insight, symptoms, social functioning, relapse rate, or quality of life as the effect of educational intervention. Three studies showed a significant difference in improvement in medication adherence between the intervention and control groups; two studies were not significant, and the rest were unmeasured. It can be concluded that educational intervention had a positive effect on PwS and their families’ knowledge, improved medication adherence, and other outcomes as an effect of the educational intervention.
改善精神分裂症患者用药知识和依从性的教育干预措施的有效性:系统回顾
不仅需要抗精神病药物,还需要额外的干预措施,如对精神分裂症患者进行教育,以支持最佳治疗。有关教育干预的研究已经开展,并显示出不同的结果。本系统性综述旨在总结和评估针对精神分裂症患者的教育干预研究的有效性。我们使用了两个电子数据库(PubMed 和 Science Direct)来查找标准为精神分裂症患者教育干预的研究,这些研究侧重于与改善知识、用药依从性和教育干预效果相关的结果测量、随机或随机对照试验研究,这些研究发表于 2012 年至 2022 年之间。此外,还对参考文献进行了人工检索。文献检索使用的术语为("精神分裂症患者 "或 "精神分裂症患者")和("教育 "或 "知识")和("服药依从性 "或 "服药依从性 "或 "服药依从性")。在 666 项研究中,有 7 项符合条件。一些教育干预措施是治疗计划的一部分,而另一些则是完整的心理教育计划,不仅针对患者,还针对患者家属。只有一项研究采用了由药剂师发放传单的咨询方式。另一项干预措施采用面对面访谈和讨论,辅以模块或小册子,或向患者发放小册子,然后通过电话跟进。七项研究中只有一项能有效提高患者的知识水平。其余的研究没有测量知识,而是评估了其他参数,如耻辱感和洞察力、症状、社会功能、复发率或生活质量,作为教育干预的效果。有三项研究显示,干预组和对照组在改善服药依从性方面差异显著;两项研究差异不显著,其余研究未进行测量。由此可以得出结论,教育干预对病人及其家属的知识、改善服药依从性和其他结果都有积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY
INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal had been established in 1972, and online publication was begun in 2008. Since 2012, the journal has been published in English by Faculty of Pharmacy Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM) Yogyakarta Indonesia in collaboration with IAI (Ikatan Apoteker Indonesia or Indonesian Pharmacist Association) and only receives manuscripts in English. Indonesian Journal of Pharmacy is Accredited by Directorate General of Higher Education. The journal includes various fields of pharmaceuticals sciences such as: -Pharmacology and Toxicology -Pharmacokinetics -Community and Clinical Pharmacy -Pharmaceutical Chemistry -Pharmaceutical Biology -Pharmaceutics -Pharmaceutical Technology -Biopharmaceutics -Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Biotechnology -Alternative medicines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信