Analyzing Chinese Banking Performance with a Trigonometric Envelopment Analysis for Ideal Solutions Model

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 MANAGEMENT
J. Antunes, Yong Tan, P. Wanke
{"title":"Analyzing Chinese Banking Performance with a Trigonometric Envelopment Analysis for Ideal Solutions Model","authors":"J. Antunes, Yong Tan, P. Wanke","doi":"10.1093/imaman/dpad026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Non-parametric Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is susceptible to the curse of dimensionality, a challenge that can be mitigated through the use of the Multi-Criteria Decision-making (MCDM) method. Conversely, DEA can overcome the limitations of the MCDM method by defining the weights of the Decision-Making Unit to calculate the data envelop. This study addresses this issue by introducing a novel model, the Trigonometric Envelopment Analysis for Ideal Solutions (TEA-IS). TEA-IS combines DEA and the Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) approaches. The proposed method is employed to assess the efficiency and performance of 367 Chinese banks over a 19-year period using various financial variables. The TEA-IS model leverages machine learning techniques to predict positive or negative outcomes for Chinese banks, taking into account various influencing factors. Our results indicate that TEA-IS scores demonstrate superior discriminatory power and reliability compared to non-parametric and MCDM methods. Furthermore, our findings reveal the presence of synergy among Chinese banks and illustrate a pattern of volatility in the Chinese banking industry’s performance. Notably, performance improved from 2000 to 2005, declined during the period from 2006 to 2013, and subsequently experienced a recovery until 2018. The majority of Chinese banks in the sample are categorized as medium performers with lower synergy levels. Additionally, the study underscores the positive impact of bank listing and age on bank performance, suggesting that regional banks outperform domestic ones.","PeriodicalId":56296,"journal":{"name":"IMA Journal of Management Mathematics","volume":"2 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IMA Journal of Management Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpad026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-parametric Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is susceptible to the curse of dimensionality, a challenge that can be mitigated through the use of the Multi-Criteria Decision-making (MCDM) method. Conversely, DEA can overcome the limitations of the MCDM method by defining the weights of the Decision-Making Unit to calculate the data envelop. This study addresses this issue by introducing a novel model, the Trigonometric Envelopment Analysis for Ideal Solutions (TEA-IS). TEA-IS combines DEA and the Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) approaches. The proposed method is employed to assess the efficiency and performance of 367 Chinese banks over a 19-year period using various financial variables. The TEA-IS model leverages machine learning techniques to predict positive or negative outcomes for Chinese banks, taking into account various influencing factors. Our results indicate that TEA-IS scores demonstrate superior discriminatory power and reliability compared to non-parametric and MCDM methods. Furthermore, our findings reveal the presence of synergy among Chinese banks and illustrate a pattern of volatility in the Chinese banking industry’s performance. Notably, performance improved from 2000 to 2005, declined during the period from 2006 to 2013, and subsequently experienced a recovery until 2018. The majority of Chinese banks in the sample are categorized as medium performers with lower synergy levels. Additionally, the study underscores the positive impact of bank listing and age on bank performance, suggesting that regional banks outperform domestic ones.
用三角包络分析理想解决方案模型分析中国银行业绩效
非参数数据包络分析法(DEA)容易受到维度诅咒的影响,通过使用多标准决策法(MCDM)可以缓解这一难题。相反,通过定义决策单元的权重来计算数据包络,DEA 可以克服 MCDM 方法的局限性。本研究通过引入一个新模型--理想解决方案三角包络分析(TEA-IS)来解决这一问题。TEA-IS 结合了 DEA 和通过与理想解决方案相似度(TOPSIS)确定订单绩效的技术方法。该方法利用各种金融变量对 367 家中国银行 19 年间的效率和绩效进行了评估。考虑到各种影响因素,TEA-IS 模型利用机器学习技术预测中国银行的积极或消极结果。我们的研究结果表明,与非参数方法和 MCDM 方法相比,TEA-IS 分数具有更高的判别能力和可靠性。此外,我们的研究结果还揭示了中国银行之间存在协同效应,并说明了中国银行业业绩的波动模式。值得注意的是,2000 年至 2005 年期间业绩有所改善,2006 年至 2013 年期间有所下降,随后在 2018 年之前经历了复苏。样本中的大多数中国银行被归类为业绩中等、协同水平较低的银行。此外,研究还强调了银行上市和年龄对银行绩效的积极影响,表明区域性银行的绩效优于国内银行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IMA Journal of Management Mathematics
IMA Journal of Management Mathematics OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.60%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of this quarterly journal is to publish mathematical research of the highest quality, impact and relevance that can be directly utilised or have demonstrable potential to be employed by managers in profit, not-for-profit, third party and governmental/public organisations to improve their practices. Thus the research must be quantitative and of the highest quality if it is to be published in the journal. Furthermore, the outcome of the research must be ultimately useful for managers. The journal also publishes novel meta-analyses of the literature, reviews of the "state-of-the art" in a manner that provides new insight, and genuine applications of mathematics to real-world problems in the form of case studies. The journal welcomes papers dealing with topics in Operational Research and Management Science, Operations Management, Decision Sciences, Transportation Science, Marketing Science, Analytics, and Financial and Risk Modelling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信