A Literature Review of Infracolic Gastrostomy Techniques and Outcomes

Sana Rashid, Harun Jalil, Alaaeldin Ginawi, Oleg Mironov, Syed Umair Mahmood
{"title":"A Literature Review of Infracolic Gastrostomy Techniques and Outcomes","authors":"Sana Rashid, Harun Jalil, Alaaeldin Ginawi, Oleg Mironov, Syed Umair Mahmood","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1777270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomies are traditionally done using a supracolic approach due to the perceived increased risk of postprocedural hemorrhage associated with an infracolic approach. Many interventional radiologists will decline attempts at placing a gastrostomy tube in situations of colonic interposition, requiring patients to undergo surgery. The goal of this review was to understand the safety and technique of infracolic gastrostomies to assess the validity of these concerns. There were 12 cases of infracolic gastrostomies identified across two retrospective studies and one case report. All gastrostomy tubes were inserted successfully with no abandoned procedures with the only minor variation in technique being that the colon was displaced superiorly as opposed to inferiorly like in the traditional supracolic approach. Across the two retrospective studies, the percentage of infracolic gastrostomies done during the study period was 1.18% (6 out of 508) and 0.43% (5 out of 1,156). There were no immediate postprocedural complications reported in the study done with six patients who underwent infracolic gastrostomies, but there were two deaths during the follow-up period, both of which were attributed to disease progression. In the study with five patients who had undergone infracolic gastrostomies, there was one minor complication of site soreness along with one case of death due to sepsis secondary to aspiration of the barium contrast used to delineate the colon prior to the procedure. This is a rare complication that can occur when a barium swallow is done, especially in this case where the patient was older and had comorbidities that increased the aspiration risk. Evidently, infracolic gastrostomies have been inserted in the past with minimal complications. However, due to the limited sample size, the safety of this technique cannot be established without future prospective studies.","PeriodicalId":32940,"journal":{"name":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","volume":" 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1777270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomies are traditionally done using a supracolic approach due to the perceived increased risk of postprocedural hemorrhage associated with an infracolic approach. Many interventional radiologists will decline attempts at placing a gastrostomy tube in situations of colonic interposition, requiring patients to undergo surgery. The goal of this review was to understand the safety and technique of infracolic gastrostomies to assess the validity of these concerns. There were 12 cases of infracolic gastrostomies identified across two retrospective studies and one case report. All gastrostomy tubes were inserted successfully with no abandoned procedures with the only minor variation in technique being that the colon was displaced superiorly as opposed to inferiorly like in the traditional supracolic approach. Across the two retrospective studies, the percentage of infracolic gastrostomies done during the study period was 1.18% (6 out of 508) and 0.43% (5 out of 1,156). There were no immediate postprocedural complications reported in the study done with six patients who underwent infracolic gastrostomies, but there were two deaths during the follow-up period, both of which were attributed to disease progression. In the study with five patients who had undergone infracolic gastrostomies, there was one minor complication of site soreness along with one case of death due to sepsis secondary to aspiration of the barium contrast used to delineate the colon prior to the procedure. This is a rare complication that can occur when a barium swallow is done, especially in this case where the patient was older and had comorbidities that increased the aspiration risk. Evidently, infracolic gastrostomies have been inserted in the past with minimal complications. However, due to the limited sample size, the safety of this technique cannot be established without future prospective studies.
下腔静脉胃造口术技术和结果的文献综述
摘要 经皮放射胃造口术传统上采用结肠上入路,因为结肠下入路会增加术后出血的风险。许多介入放射科医生会拒绝在结肠插管的情况下尝试放置胃造瘘管,要求患者接受手术。本综述旨在了解结肠下胃造瘘的安全性和技术,以评估这些担忧的合理性。两份回顾性研究和一份病例报告共发现了 12 例结肠下胃造瘘术。所有胃造瘘管都成功插入,没有放弃手术,唯一的技术小变化是结肠向上方移位,而不是像传统的结肠上切法那样向下方移位。在这两项回顾性研究中,研究期间结肠下胃造瘘的比例分别为 1.18%(508 例中有 6 例)和 0.43%(1156 例中有 5 例)。在对6名接受胃下弯造口术的患者进行的研究中,没有发现术后即刻并发症的报道,但有两人在随访期间死亡,原因都是疾病进展。在对五名接受了结肠下胃造瘘术的患者进行的研究中,有一例轻微的并发症是手术部位疼痛,还有一例死亡病例是由于在手术前吸入了用于划定结肠的钡造影剂,继发于败血症。这是一种罕见的并发症,在进行钡剂吞咽时可能会发生,尤其是在这种情况下,患者年龄较大且患有合并症,增加了吸入的风险。显而易见,过去插入胃下孔时并发症极少。然而,由于样本量有限,如果没有未来的前瞻性研究,这种技术的安全性还无法确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信