The biometric habeas data in the digital and algorithmic era in the European Union

Simona Fanni
{"title":"The biometric habeas data in the digital and algorithmic era in the European Union","authors":"Simona Fanni","doi":"10.51799/2763-8685v3n2001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advent of artificial intelligence and of the Big Data has affected the use of biometric data in the digital and algorithmic era, posing some critical challenges, especially in relation to the risk of surveillance, data scraping and profiling. In this context, the emergence of a novel “informationally projected corporality” requires law to rethink its approach to data protection and to define an Habeas Data for this transformation, and, in this sense, the European Union (EU) has been demonstrating to be a global leader. Under this premise, the purpose of this paper is to explore the relevant primary and secondary EU law sources, in order to provide a critical assessment of their role with respect to the challenges related to the protection of biometric data in the digital and algorithmic era. In light of this reflection, the paper develops some final considerations. In particular, it takes the view that the EU, so far, has defined a significant framework for the protection of the regional Habeas Data with respect to biometric data. However, the most pioneering change is still to come. In this respect, the paper suggest that the AI Act Proposal has the potential for bridging the current legal landscape and the future horizons of EU law and its biometric Habeas Data. Some reference is made to justiciability and to the role that the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) may play, also by promoting judicial dialogue with the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). From the methodological viewpoint, an in-depth analysis of the relevant EU law sources and of the relevant case law of the ECJ was carried out, and some critical comparison with the jurisprudence of the ECtHR was made. Moreover, scholarship in English, Spanish and Italian was widely explored.","PeriodicalId":171261,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of European Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of European Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51799/2763-8685v3n2001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advent of artificial intelligence and of the Big Data has affected the use of biometric data in the digital and algorithmic era, posing some critical challenges, especially in relation to the risk of surveillance, data scraping and profiling. In this context, the emergence of a novel “informationally projected corporality” requires law to rethink its approach to data protection and to define an Habeas Data for this transformation, and, in this sense, the European Union (EU) has been demonstrating to be a global leader. Under this premise, the purpose of this paper is to explore the relevant primary and secondary EU law sources, in order to provide a critical assessment of their role with respect to the challenges related to the protection of biometric data in the digital and algorithmic era. In light of this reflection, the paper develops some final considerations. In particular, it takes the view that the EU, so far, has defined a significant framework for the protection of the regional Habeas Data with respect to biometric data. However, the most pioneering change is still to come. In this respect, the paper suggest that the AI Act Proposal has the potential for bridging the current legal landscape and the future horizons of EU law and its biometric Habeas Data. Some reference is made to justiciability and to the role that the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) may play, also by promoting judicial dialogue with the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). From the methodological viewpoint, an in-depth analysis of the relevant EU law sources and of the relevant case law of the ECJ was carried out, and some critical comparison with the jurisprudence of the ECtHR was made. Moreover, scholarship in English, Spanish and Italian was widely explored.
欧盟数字和算法时代的生物特征人身保护数据
人工智能和大数据的出现影响了生物识别数据在数字和算法时代的使用,带来了一些严峻的挑战,特别是与监视、数据搜刮和貌相风险有关的挑战。在此背景下,一种新的 "信息投射体 "的出现要求法律重新思考其数据保护的方法,并为这一转变定义一个哈贝马斯数据,在这个意义上,欧盟(EU)已显示出全球领导者的风范。在此前提下,本文的目的是探讨相关的主要和次要欧盟法律来源,以便对其在数字和算法时代与生物识别数据保护相关的挑战方面的作用进行批判性评估。根据这一思考,本文提出了一些最终考虑。特别是,本文认为欧盟迄今已为保护生物识别数据方面的地区人身保护数据确定了一个重要框架。然而,最具开创性的变革还在后面。在这方面,本文认为《人工智能法提案》有可能在欧盟法律及其生物识别人身保护数据的现有法律格局和未来视野之间架起一座桥梁。本文在一定程度上提到了可诉性以及欧盟法院(ECJ)可能发挥的作用,包括促进与欧洲人权法院(ECtHR)的司法对话。从方法论的角度来看,对相关欧盟法律渊源和欧洲法院的相关判例法进行了深入分析,并与欧洲人权法院的判例进行了一些批判性比较。此外,还广泛研究了英语、西班牙语和意大利语的学术研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信