Latent profiles of telehealth care satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic among patients with cardiac conditions in an outpatient setting

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Dinah van Schalkwijk MSc , Paul Lodder PhD , Jonas Everaert PhD , Jos Widdershoven MD, PhD , Mirela Habibović PhD
{"title":"Latent profiles of telehealth care satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic among patients with cardiac conditions in an outpatient setting","authors":"Dinah van Schalkwijk MSc ,&nbsp;Paul Lodder PhD ,&nbsp;Jonas Everaert PhD ,&nbsp;Jos Widdershoven MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Mirela Habibović PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.11.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine was advocated and rapidly scaled up worldwide. However, little is known about for whom this type of care is acceptable.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine which patient characteristics (demographic, medical, psychosocial) are associated with telehealth care satisfaction, attitude toward telehealth, and preference regarding telehealth over time in a cardiac patient population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 317 patients were recruited at the Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital in The Netherlands. All patients who had received telehealth care (telephone and video) in the previous 2 months were approached for participation. Baseline, 3-month, and 6-month questionnaires were administered online. A 3-step latent class analysis was conducted to identify trajectories of telehealth use over time and the possible association of the found trajectories with external variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Five trajectories (classes) were identified for satisfaction with telehealth and 4 for attitude toward telehealth. Patients with higher distress, lower physical and mental health, higher scores on pessimism, and negative affectivity were more likely to be less satisfied. Patients with no partner, more comorbidities, higher distress, lower physical and mental health, and higher scores on pessimism were more likely to hold a negative attitude toward telehealth. For the future application of telehealth, marital status, comorbidities, digital health literacy, and pessimism were significantly related.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Results show that patients’ profiles should be considered when offering telehealth care and that the “one size fits all” approach does not apply. Results can inform clinical practice on how to better implement remote health care in the future while considering a personalized approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72527,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 85-95"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693623001081/pdfft?md5=f1c3bc1a3392011c211b226545160e82&pid=1-s2.0-S2666693623001081-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693623001081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine was advocated and rapidly scaled up worldwide. However, little is known about for whom this type of care is acceptable.

Objective

To examine which patient characteristics (demographic, medical, psychosocial) are associated with telehealth care satisfaction, attitude toward telehealth, and preference regarding telehealth over time in a cardiac patient population.

Methods

In total, 317 patients were recruited at the Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital in The Netherlands. All patients who had received telehealth care (telephone and video) in the previous 2 months were approached for participation. Baseline, 3-month, and 6-month questionnaires were administered online. A 3-step latent class analysis was conducted to identify trajectories of telehealth use over time and the possible association of the found trajectories with external variables.

Results

Five trajectories (classes) were identified for satisfaction with telehealth and 4 for attitude toward telehealth. Patients with higher distress, lower physical and mental health, higher scores on pessimism, and negative affectivity were more likely to be less satisfied. Patients with no partner, more comorbidities, higher distress, lower physical and mental health, and higher scores on pessimism were more likely to hold a negative attitude toward telehealth. For the future application of telehealth, marital status, comorbidities, digital health literacy, and pessimism were significantly related.

Conclusion

Results show that patients’ profiles should be considered when offering telehealth care and that the “one size fits all” approach does not apply. Results can inform clinical practice on how to better implement remote health care in the future while considering a personalized approach.

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,门诊心脏病患者对远程保健满意度的潜在特征
背景在 COVID-19 大流行期间,远程医疗在全球范围内得到提倡并迅速推广。目的 研究在心脏病患者群体中,哪些患者特征(人口统计学、医学、社会心理学)与远程医疗满意度、对远程医疗的态度以及随着时间的推移对远程医疗的偏好相关。方法 在荷兰伊丽莎白-特威斯登医院共招募了 317 名患者。所有在过去 2 个月中接受过远程医疗(电话和视频)的患者均被邀请参与。基线问卷、3 个月问卷和 6 个月问卷均在网上进行。通过三步潜类分析,确定了远程医疗随时间推移的使用轨迹,以及所发现的轨迹与外部变量之间可能存在的关联。结果确定了远程医疗满意度的五个轨迹(类)和远程医疗态度的四个轨迹(类)。痛苦程度较高、身体和精神健康状况较差、悲观情绪和消极情绪得分较高的患者更有可能不那么满意。没有伴侣、合并症较多、痛苦程度较高、身心健康程度较低、悲观程度较高的患者更有可能对远程保健持消极态度。对于远程医疗的未来应用,婚姻状况、合并症、数字健康知识和悲观情绪有显著相关性。研究结果可为临床实践提供参考,指导今后如何在考虑个性化方法的同时更好地实施远程医疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular digital health journal
Cardiovascular digital health journal Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信