{"title":"Zwischen Konsistenz und Flexibilität","authors":"H. Bleß","doi":"10.24945/mvf.06.23.1866-0533.2562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the provisions of SGB V, evidence-based medicine (EBM) forms the basis for the work of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) and the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) in their medical assessments and decisions on the specification of care content such as disease management programmes (DMP) and the services to be financed by the statutory health insurance (SHI). The evaluation of available evidence is thus directly linked to pricing, reimbursement and also to care management. Greater flexibility in dealing with the evidence requirements has been exercised in the past, but without consistency and certainly also when a lowering of the requirement level led to a financial advantage for the statutory health insurance (SHI). At the same time, there are also examples in which the clinical relevance of an intervention was so obvious that the G-BA used its room for manoeuvre in the interests of healthcare.","PeriodicalId":486737,"journal":{"name":"Monitor Versorgungsforschung","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monitor Versorgungsforschung","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24945/mvf.06.23.1866-0533.2562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Based on the provisions of SGB V, evidence-based medicine (EBM) forms the basis for the work of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) and the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) in their medical assessments and decisions on the specification of care content such as disease management programmes (DMP) and the services to be financed by the statutory health insurance (SHI). The evaluation of available evidence is thus directly linked to pricing, reimbursement and also to care management. Greater flexibility in dealing with the evidence requirements has been exercised in the past, but without consistency and certainly also when a lowering of the requirement level led to a financial advantage for the statutory health insurance (SHI). At the same time, there are also examples in which the clinical relevance of an intervention was so obvious that the G-BA used its room for manoeuvre in the interests of healthcare.
根据 SGB V 的规定,循证医学(EBM)是联邦联合委员会(G-BA)和医疗保健质量与效率研究所(IQWiG)进行医疗评估和决定医疗内容(如疾病管理计划(DMP)和法定医疗保险(SHI)资助的服务)的基础。因此,对现有证据的评估与定价、报销以及护理管理直接相关。过去,在处理证据要求方面曾有过更大的灵活性,但缺乏一致性,当然也有降低要求水平给法定医疗保险(SHI)带来经济利益的情况。同时,也有这样的例子,即干预措施的临床意义非常明显,G-BA 为了医疗保健的利益利用了其回旋余地。