Wenn die Versorgungsforschung bedeutsam wird

P. Stegmaier
{"title":"Wenn die Versorgungsforschung bedeutsam wird","authors":"P. Stegmaier","doi":"10.24945/mvf.06.23.1866-0533.2552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‚Dear health services researchers, we have finally achieved what we have been working for.‘ With these enthusiastic words, Prof Dr Wolfgang Hoffmann, Chairman of the German Network for Health Services Research (DNVF), opened the 22nd DKVF, which took place at the Urania in Berlin at the beginning of October. The reason for his delight was the fact that - Hoffmann continued - the Innovation Committee recommends the transfer to standard care for 17 projects from the first and second funding waves of the new forms of care, but above all that the results of care research - including those of the ‚WiZen‘ innovation fund project, which was able to demonstrate the superiority of initial therapy in the primary treatment of cancer patients in certified centres - form an evidence base for the recommendations of the government commission for hospital reform. However, this is also precisely what the DNVF Chairman reminded the research community gathered at the German Congress for Health Services Research. Since health services research is now systemically relevant, this not only entails growing responsibility, but also has serious consequences: ‚Health services research now has critics.‘ Because, according to Hoffmann: ‚Our results, recommendations and priorities are now more likely to have consequences, they affect care providers, shift the balance of power and change financial flows.‘","PeriodicalId":486737,"journal":{"name":"Monitor Versorgungsforschung","volume":"30 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monitor Versorgungsforschung","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24945/mvf.06.23.1866-0533.2552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

‚Dear health services researchers, we have finally achieved what we have been working for.‘ With these enthusiastic words, Prof Dr Wolfgang Hoffmann, Chairman of the German Network for Health Services Research (DNVF), opened the 22nd DKVF, which took place at the Urania in Berlin at the beginning of October. The reason for his delight was the fact that - Hoffmann continued - the Innovation Committee recommends the transfer to standard care for 17 projects from the first and second funding waves of the new forms of care, but above all that the results of care research - including those of the ‚WiZen‘ innovation fund project, which was able to demonstrate the superiority of initial therapy in the primary treatment of cancer patients in certified centres - form an evidence base for the recommendations of the government commission for hospital reform. However, this is also precisely what the DNVF Chairman reminded the research community gathered at the German Congress for Health Services Research. Since health services research is now systemically relevant, this not only entails growing responsibility, but also has serious consequences: ‚Health services research now has critics.‘ Because, according to Hoffmann: ‚Our results, recommendations and priorities are now more likely to have consequences, they affect care providers, shift the balance of power and change financial flows.‘
当医疗保健研究变得重要时
亲爱的医疗服务研究人员,我们终于实现了一直以来的目标。"德国医疗服务研究网络(DNVF)主席沃尔夫冈-霍夫曼(Wolfgang Hoffmann)教授用这句热情洋溢的话宣布了10月初在柏林乌拉尼亚(Urania)举行的第22届德国医疗服务研究网络论坛(DKVF)开幕。霍夫曼接着说,他之所以感到高兴,是因为创新委员会建议将新医疗形式第一和第二轮资助中的17个项目转为标准医疗,最重要的是,医疗研究的成果(包括 "WiZen "创新基金项目的成果,该项目证明了在认证中心对癌症患者进行初级治疗时初始疗法的优越性)为政府医院改革委员会的建议提供了证据基础。不过,这也正是 DNVF 主席提醒参加德国医疗服务研究大会的研究界人士的。由于医疗服务研究现在与系统相关,这不仅需要承担越来越多的责任,而且还会产生严重后果:医疗服务研究现在有了批评者。因为,霍夫曼认为:"我们的成果、建议和优先事项现在更有可能产生后果,它们会影响医疗服务提供者,改变权力平衡,改变资金流向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信