Rethinking the Essentiality of Homo Islamicus: Exploring the Fundamental Critiques

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Muhammad Sholihin, Catur Sugiyanto, A. Susamto
{"title":"Rethinking the Essentiality of Homo Islamicus: Exploring the Fundamental Critiques","authors":"Muhammad Sholihin, Catur Sugiyanto, A. Susamto","doi":"10.32350/jitc.132.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the necessity of homo islamicus perspective in Islamic economics. As such, it is a conceptual paper that emphasizes a critical approach to identify new concepts and critiques regarding homo islamicus. The conceptual approach focuses on theoretical analysis, in which the study aims to investigate the concept of homo islamicus and explain its logical implications. This approach enables the researcher to critique and identify a research gap regarding the concept of homo islamicus. The study highlighted several reasons, which identify that homo islamicus is not essential. Firstly, it was marked that the development of Islamic economics does not rely on the obedience and righteousness of economic actors. Secondly, as homo islamicus holds significant status, it should not be prioritized over other foundational concepts. Lastly, the study foregrounded that although homo islamicus is significant in its current form, it is not necessary to establish the basis for transforming the Islamic economy. Furthermore, it was also observed that it is still required in Islamic economics; thus, homo islamicus should not be the sole concept, excluding other relevant concepts for comparison. Additionally, this study underscores that homo islamicus loses its significance when it is seen as final and absolute; however, it may contradict the ongoing quest for the identity of Islamic economics.","PeriodicalId":36736,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization","volume":"31 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.132.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the necessity of homo islamicus perspective in Islamic economics. As such, it is a conceptual paper that emphasizes a critical approach to identify new concepts and critiques regarding homo islamicus. The conceptual approach focuses on theoretical analysis, in which the study aims to investigate the concept of homo islamicus and explain its logical implications. This approach enables the researcher to critique and identify a research gap regarding the concept of homo islamicus. The study highlighted several reasons, which identify that homo islamicus is not essential. Firstly, it was marked that the development of Islamic economics does not rely on the obedience and righteousness of economic actors. Secondly, as homo islamicus holds significant status, it should not be prioritized over other foundational concepts. Lastly, the study foregrounded that although homo islamicus is significant in its current form, it is not necessary to establish the basis for transforming the Islamic economy. Furthermore, it was also observed that it is still required in Islamic economics; thus, homo islamicus should not be the sole concept, excluding other relevant concepts for comparison. Additionally, this study underscores that homo islamicus loses its significance when it is seen as final and absolute; however, it may contradict the ongoing quest for the identity of Islamic economics.
反思伊斯兰智人的本质:探索基本批判
本文探讨了伊斯兰经济学中伊斯兰同源观点的必要性。因此,这是一篇概念性论文,强调以批判性的方法来确定有关伊斯兰同源的新概念和批判。概念方法侧重于理论分析,研究旨在探讨伊斯兰同源概念并解释其逻辑含义。这种方法使研究人员能够对伊斯兰人类的概念进行批判并找出研究空白。这项研究强调了几个原因,这些原因表明伊斯兰同族人并不是必不可少的。首先,伊斯兰经济学的发展并不依赖于经济行为者的服从和正义。其次,"伊斯兰同源 "具有重要地位,因此不应优先于其他基本概念。最后,研究强调,尽管伊斯兰同源在当前形式下具有重要意义,但没有必要将其作为伊斯兰经济转型的基础。此外,研究还发现,伊斯兰经济学仍然需要伊斯兰同形同性概念;因此,伊斯兰同形同性概念不应是唯一的概念,不应排除其他相关概念进行比较。此外,本研究强调,如果将伊斯兰同一性视为最终和绝对的概念,它就失去了意义;然而,它可能与伊斯兰经济学对自身特性的不断追求相矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization
Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信