KEDUDUKAN HUKUM PENGURUS PERSEROAN SEBAGAI PENANGGUNG PAJAK

I. Gede, Yudi Arsawan, D. Purnamasari, Rini Purwaningsih
{"title":"KEDUDUKAN HUKUM PENGURUS PERSEROAN SEBAGAI PENANGGUNG PAJAK","authors":"I. Gede, Yudi Arsawan, D. Purnamasari, Rini Purwaningsih","doi":"10.25105/prio.v11i1.18776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In carrying out the governance of a nation, there are expenses necessary for the expenditures of the state, some of which are obtained through tax revenues collected from individuals classified as taxpayers. However, not all taxpayers fulfill their tax payments on time, and sometimes there are those who fall behind on their taxes, resulting in tax debt. Article 9, paragraph (2) PMK 61/2023 specifically governs the liability of limited liability company directors, wherein the corporate tax debt can be borne personally and/or jointly, including the entire tax debt and tax collection costs. This differs from the responsibility of limited liability company directors as regulated in Law 40/2007, which fundamentally imposes limitations on the accountability of individuals in their positions. As a result, there is ambiguity for corporate managements regarding the limitations of accountability in the tax perspective compared to the corporate law perspective. This research attempts to examine the importance of affirming the legal position of corporate directors as tax debtors. By using normative methods, the author aims to find legal certainty regarding the issues discussed. This research concludes that there is a legal vacuum in regulating the requirements for corporate managements to be exempted from being tax bearers. So that the author recommends that written regulations must be made regarding the understanding of the tax debt insurer for the company's tax debt is limited only to the company's management who is responsible for the company when the tax debt arises.\nKeywords: Corporate Managements, Tax Debt Insurer, Tax Debt","PeriodicalId":335820,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS","volume":"289 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25105/prio.v11i1.18776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In carrying out the governance of a nation, there are expenses necessary for the expenditures of the state, some of which are obtained through tax revenues collected from individuals classified as taxpayers. However, not all taxpayers fulfill their tax payments on time, and sometimes there are those who fall behind on their taxes, resulting in tax debt. Article 9, paragraph (2) PMK 61/2023 specifically governs the liability of limited liability company directors, wherein the corporate tax debt can be borne personally and/or jointly, including the entire tax debt and tax collection costs. This differs from the responsibility of limited liability company directors as regulated in Law 40/2007, which fundamentally imposes limitations on the accountability of individuals in their positions. As a result, there is ambiguity for corporate managements regarding the limitations of accountability in the tax perspective compared to the corporate law perspective. This research attempts to examine the importance of affirming the legal position of corporate directors as tax debtors. By using normative methods, the author aims to find legal certainty regarding the issues discussed. This research concludes that there is a legal vacuum in regulating the requirements for corporate managements to be exempted from being tax bearers. So that the author recommends that written regulations must be made regarding the understanding of the tax debt insurer for the company's tax debt is limited only to the company's management who is responsible for the company when the tax debt arises. Keywords: Corporate Managements, Tax Debt Insurer, Tax Debt
公司管理层作为税务保险人的法律地位
在实施国家治理的过程中,国家需要支出一些必要的费用,其中一些费用是通过向纳税人征收的税收获得的。然而,并非所有纳税人都能按时缴纳税款,有时有些纳税人会拖欠税款,导致欠税。PMK 61/2023 第 9 条第(2)款专门规定了有限责任公司董事的责任,其中公司税债可由个人和/或共同承担,包括全部税债和收税费用。这与第 40/2007 号法律规定的有限责任公司董事的责任不同,该法律从根本上限制了个人在其职位上的责任。因此,与公司法角度相比,公司管理层对税务角度的责任限制存在模糊认识。本研究试图探讨确认公司董事作为税务债务人的法律地位的重要性。通过使用规范方法,作者旨在找到与所讨论问题相关的法律确定性。本研究的结论是,在规范公司管理层免税要求方面存在法律真空。因此,作者建议必须制定成文法规,规定公司税债保险人对公司税债的理解仅限于在税债产生时对公司负责的公司管理层:公司管理层;税债保险人;税债
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信