ELEMEN-ELEMEN DASAR KEJAHATAN TERHADAP KEMANUSIAAN

Ayu Nrangwesti, Yulia Fitriliani, Maya Indrasti Notoprayitno
{"title":"ELEMEN-ELEMEN DASAR KEJAHATAN TERHADAP KEMANUSIAAN","authors":"Ayu Nrangwesti, Yulia Fitriliani, Maya Indrasti Notoprayitno","doi":"10.25105/prio.v11i1.18772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was created to analyze the basic elements of crimes against humanity as stated in the 1998 Rome Statute. The study carried out was comprehensive (looking through the context of Indonesian criminal law, human rights law and international law), and comparative (comparing the elements of the crime of genocide). The background to the emergence of the research problem is the uncertainty of the nomenclature of crimes against humanity which includes the word humanity in it. This is because the concept of humanity can give rise to broad interpretations. This research is also motivated by the desire to compare crimes against humanity with the crime of genocide, especially those related to similar or overlapping elements. The problem in this research consists of 2 (two) main problems, namely: First, a comprehensive analytical elaboration of 3 (three) basic elements crimes against humanity; The second analytical elaboration is comparative to the crime of genocide. The aim of this research is ultimately to provide recommendations to the Indonesian government regarding input for reconceiving crimes against humanity in statutory regulations. The benefits of research are both academic (one of the duties of lecturers is conducting research and for teaching materials for international criminal law and human rights law) and practical (for practitioners, such as judges, prosecutors, lawyers, non-governmental organization activists and social/human rights observers man). This research is a type of doctrinal research with a comparative approach. The research data sources used are primary legal materials (primary sources). Apart from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials (secondary sources) are also the main sources in this research. A comparative approach is carried out by comparing the elements contained in crimes against humanity with the crime of genocide. The conclusion of this research is the discovery of 3 (three) main elements of crimes against humanity, namely: Widespread and systematic attacks; Directed attack on civilian people; Imputable to state/organization's policy. The most difficult element to prove is the third element, namely finding a connection between the actions of a person or group of people and their country's policies. The crime of genocide includes concrete and reliable elements that characterize the crime, while crimes against humanity still seem to overlap with the crime of genocide, even with other international crimes.\nKeywords: Genocide; Imputability; Crimes against Humanity; Widespread and Systematically Attack; Civilian.","PeriodicalId":335820,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25105/prio.v11i1.18772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research was created to analyze the basic elements of crimes against humanity as stated in the 1998 Rome Statute. The study carried out was comprehensive (looking through the context of Indonesian criminal law, human rights law and international law), and comparative (comparing the elements of the crime of genocide). The background to the emergence of the research problem is the uncertainty of the nomenclature of crimes against humanity which includes the word humanity in it. This is because the concept of humanity can give rise to broad interpretations. This research is also motivated by the desire to compare crimes against humanity with the crime of genocide, especially those related to similar or overlapping elements. The problem in this research consists of 2 (two) main problems, namely: First, a comprehensive analytical elaboration of 3 (three) basic elements crimes against humanity; The second analytical elaboration is comparative to the crime of genocide. The aim of this research is ultimately to provide recommendations to the Indonesian government regarding input for reconceiving crimes against humanity in statutory regulations. The benefits of research are both academic (one of the duties of lecturers is conducting research and for teaching materials for international criminal law and human rights law) and practical (for practitioners, such as judges, prosecutors, lawyers, non-governmental organization activists and social/human rights observers man). This research is a type of doctrinal research with a comparative approach. The research data sources used are primary legal materials (primary sources). Apart from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials (secondary sources) are also the main sources in this research. A comparative approach is carried out by comparing the elements contained in crimes against humanity with the crime of genocide. The conclusion of this research is the discovery of 3 (three) main elements of crimes against humanity, namely: Widespread and systematic attacks; Directed attack on civilian people; Imputable to state/organization's policy. The most difficult element to prove is the third element, namely finding a connection between the actions of a person or group of people and their country's policies. The crime of genocide includes concrete and reliable elements that characterize the crime, while crimes against humanity still seem to overlap with the crime of genocide, even with other international crimes. Keywords: Genocide; Imputability; Crimes against Humanity; Widespread and Systematically Attack; Civilian.
危害人类罪的基本要素
本研究旨在分析 1998 年《罗马规约》中规定的危害人类罪的基本要素。所开展的研究具有全面性(从印度尼西亚刑法、人权法和国际法的角度进行研究)和比较性(对种族灭绝罪的要素进行比较)。研究问题出现的背景是危害人类罪术语的不确定性,其中包括 "人道 "一词。这是因为 "人道 "的概念可能会引起广泛的解释。本研究的另一个动机是希望将危害人类罪与种族灭绝罪进行比较,特别是与类似或重叠要素有关的罪行。本研究的问题包括两个主要问题,即第一,全面分析阐述危害人类罪的 3 个基本要素;第二,分析阐述与种族灭绝罪的比较。本研究的最终目的是向印尼政府提出建议,为在法规中重新认识反人类罪提供参考。研究的益处既有学术方面的(讲师的职责之一是开展研究并编写国际刑法和人权法教材),也有实践方面的(对于从业人员,如法官、检察官、律师、非政府组织活动家和社会/人权观察员而言)。本研究是一种采用比较方法的理论研究。使用的研究数据来源是原始法律材料(主要来源)。除第一手法律资料外,第二手法律资料(二手资料)也是本研究的主要资料来源。通过比较危害人类罪和种族灭绝罪中包含的要素,本研究采用了比较法。本研究的结论是发现了危害人类罪的 3 个主要要素,即广泛和有系统的攻击;对平民的直接攻击;可归咎于国家/组织的政策。最难证明的要素是第三个要素,即找到一个人或一群人的行为与其国家政策之间的联系。灭绝种族罪包括具体可靠的要素,这些要素是该罪行的特征,而危害人类罪似乎仍与灭绝种族罪重叠,甚至与其他国际罪行重叠:灭绝种族罪;可归责性;危害人类罪;广泛和有系统的攻击;平民。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信