Reproducing popularity bias in recommendation: the effect of evaluation strategies

Savvina Daniil, Mirjam Cuper, Cynthia C. S. Liem, Jacco Van Ossenbruggen, L. Hollink
{"title":"Reproducing popularity bias in recommendation: the effect of evaluation strategies","authors":"Savvina Daniil, Mirjam Cuper, Cynthia C. S. Liem, Jacco Van Ossenbruggen, L. Hollink","doi":"10.1145/3637066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The extent to which popularity bias is propagated by media recommender systems is a current topic within the community, as is the uneven propagation among users with varying interests for niche items. Recent work focused on exactly this topic, with movies being the domain of interest. Later on, two different research teams reproduced the methodology in the domains of music and books respectively. The results across the different domains diverge. In this paper, we reproduce the three studies and identify four aspects that are relevant in investigating the differences in results: data, algorithms, division of users in groups and evaluation strategy. We run a set of experiments in which we measure general popularity bias propagation and unfair treatment of certain users with various combinations of these aspects. We conclude that all aspects account to some degree for the divergence in results, and should be carefully considered in future studies. Further, we find that the divergence in findings can be in large part attributed to the choice of evaluation strategy.","PeriodicalId":474833,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems","volume":"15 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3637066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The extent to which popularity bias is propagated by media recommender systems is a current topic within the community, as is the uneven propagation among users with varying interests for niche items. Recent work focused on exactly this topic, with movies being the domain of interest. Later on, two different research teams reproduced the methodology in the domains of music and books respectively. The results across the different domains diverge. In this paper, we reproduce the three studies and identify four aspects that are relevant in investigating the differences in results: data, algorithms, division of users in groups and evaluation strategy. We run a set of experiments in which we measure general popularity bias propagation and unfair treatment of certain users with various combinations of these aspects. We conclude that all aspects account to some degree for the divergence in results, and should be carefully considered in future studies. Further, we find that the divergence in findings can be in large part attributed to the choice of evaluation strategy.
再现推荐中的受欢迎程度偏差:评估策略的影响
媒体推荐系统在多大程度上会传播流行度偏差是当前社区内的一个话题,在对小众项目有不同兴趣的用户之间传播流行度偏差也是如此。最近的研究工作正是聚焦于这一话题,并以电影为研究领域。后来,两个不同的研究团队分别在音乐和图书领域复制了这一方法。不同领域的研究结果各不相同。在本文中,我们重现了这三项研究,并找出了与研究结果差异相关的四个方面:数据、算法、用户分组和评估策略。我们进行了一系列实验,通过这些方面的不同组合来衡量一般流行度偏差传播和对某些用户的不公平待遇。我们得出的结论是,所有方面都在一定程度上造成了结果的差异,在今后的研究中应仔细考虑。此外,我们还发现,研究结果的差异在很大程度上可归因于评估策略的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书