Choices and Allocation of Costs for Religious Preferences and Practices: Insights from an Israeli Test Case

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Amos A. Israel-Vleeschhouwer
{"title":"Choices and Allocation of Costs for Religious Preferences and Practices: Insights from an Israeli Test Case","authors":"Amos A. Israel-Vleeschhouwer","doi":"10.1163/22124810-11010007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nInternalization of costs of religious preferences fits the religious self-perception and ideology of many religious communities and is in their long-term interest. It also strengthens the external value of religious communities, norms, and institutions for the wider society.\nMany forces press religious communities to reduce the costs of religious preferences. Within a community, costs are reduced by limiting the available choices or shifted to its weaker members; outside the community, costs are shifted to other groups or the state. Incentives influence the allocation of costs, which in turn shape internal communal choices and the religious vitality and sustainability of the community. The allocation of costs also affects the external relations of communities. This article suggests that the allocation of costs is yet another aspect of religious and ideological communities in liberal states that deserves investigation at the constitutional, legal, and regulatory levels.","PeriodicalId":37986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law, Religion and State","volume":"8 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law, Religion and State","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22124810-11010007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Internalization of costs of religious preferences fits the religious self-perception and ideology of many religious communities and is in their long-term interest. It also strengthens the external value of religious communities, norms, and institutions for the wider society. Many forces press religious communities to reduce the costs of religious preferences. Within a community, costs are reduced by limiting the available choices or shifted to its weaker members; outside the community, costs are shifted to other groups or the state. Incentives influence the allocation of costs, which in turn shape internal communal choices and the religious vitality and sustainability of the community. The allocation of costs also affects the external relations of communities. This article suggests that the allocation of costs is yet another aspect of religious and ideological communities in liberal states that deserves investigation at the constitutional, legal, and regulatory levels.
宗教偏好和习俗的选择与成本分配:以色列测试案例的启示
宗教偏好成本的内部化符合许多宗教团体的宗教自我认知和意识形态,也符合他们的长远利益。这也加强了宗教团体、规范和制度对更广泛社会的外部价值。许多力量迫使宗教团体降低宗教偏好的成本。在宗教团体内部,成本会通过限制可供选择的宗教或将成本转嫁给弱小成员来降低;在宗教团体外部,成本会转嫁给其他团体或国家。激励机制影响着成本的分配,而成本的分配又影响着社区内部的选择以及社区的宗教活力和可持续性。成本分配也会影响社区的外部关系。本文认为,成本分配是自由主义国家宗教和意识形态社群的另一个方面,值得在宪法、法律和监管层面进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Law, Religion and State
Journal of Law, Religion and State Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: The Journal of Law Religion and State provides an international forum for the study of the interactions between law and religion and between religion and state. It seeks to explore these interactions from legal and constitutional as well as from internal religious perspectives. The JLRS is a peer-reviewed journal that is committed to a broad and open discussion on a cross-cultural basis. Submission of articles in the following areas: religion and state; legal and political aspects of all religious traditions; comparative research of different religious legal systems and their interrelations are welcomed as are contributions from multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信