Functional morphology of the stem in the Lower Palaeozoic crinoid Macrostylocrinus Hall from Scotland

IF 0.5 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOLOGY
Stephen K. Donovan
{"title":"Functional morphology of the stem in the Lower Palaeozoic crinoid\n Macrostylocrinus\n Hall from Scotland","authors":"Stephen K. Donovan","doi":"10.1144/sjg2023-021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Two species of the closely-related monobathrid crinoid from the Lower Palaeozoic of Scotland, namely\n Macrostylocrinus cirrifer\n Ramsbottom (Upper Ordovician, Katian) and\n Macrostylocrinus silurocirrifer\n Brower (Lower Silurian, Telychian), are similar in having elongate, unbranched radices proximally. These were not cirri, as suggested by their names, but were radices which were more or less inflexible, lacking contractile tissues. The function of these radices was uncertain. In the absence of contractile tissues, they could not have been for grasping other upright structures and crinoid do not need help to balance, their posture being maintained by mutable collagenous tissues. It is possible, but unlikely, that they may have acted to direct feeding currents towards the crown. Most probably, in an analogy to the post-Palaeozoic isocrinids, the stem acted like a ‘conveyor belt’, the proximal, radicular and upright part being carried away from the cup as further columnals are inserted, eventually forming a distal, recumbent attachment structure. The elongate radices would have stabilised the dististele, but, unlike isocrinids, the arms of\n Macrostylocrinus\n spp. were not adapted for crawling and thus escaping predators. Both\n M. silurocirrifer\n (type species) and\n M. cirrifer\n are included in\n Macrostylocrinus\n (\n Scotimacrostylocrinus\n ) subgen. nov.\n","PeriodicalId":49556,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Journal of Geology","volume":"13 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish Journal of Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/sjg2023-021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two species of the closely-related monobathrid crinoid from the Lower Palaeozoic of Scotland, namely Macrostylocrinus cirrifer Ramsbottom (Upper Ordovician, Katian) and Macrostylocrinus silurocirrifer Brower (Lower Silurian, Telychian), are similar in having elongate, unbranched radices proximally. These were not cirri, as suggested by their names, but were radices which were more or less inflexible, lacking contractile tissues. The function of these radices was uncertain. In the absence of contractile tissues, they could not have been for grasping other upright structures and crinoid do not need help to balance, their posture being maintained by mutable collagenous tissues. It is possible, but unlikely, that they may have acted to direct feeding currents towards the crown. Most probably, in an analogy to the post-Palaeozoic isocrinids, the stem acted like a ‘conveyor belt’, the proximal, radicular and upright part being carried away from the cup as further columnals are inserted, eventually forming a distal, recumbent attachment structure. The elongate radices would have stabilised the dististele, but, unlike isocrinids, the arms of Macrostylocrinus spp. were not adapted for crawling and thus escaping predators. Both M. silurocirrifer (type species) and M. cirrifer are included in Macrostylocrinus ( Scotimacrostylocrinus ) subgen. nov.
苏格兰下古生界板鳃亚纲棘皮动物 Macrostylocrinus Hall 茎的功能形态
苏格兰下古生界的两个物种,即Macrostylocrinus cirrifer Ramsbottom(上奥陶世,卡蒂期)和Macrostylocrinus silurocirrifer Brower(下志留纪,泰利奇期),是与之密切相关的单叶棘皮动物,它们的相似之处在于下部都有细长、不分枝的辐射状突起。正如它们的名字所暗示的那样,这些根状茎并不是卷须,而是或多或少缺乏弹性、缺乏收缩组织的根状茎。这些放射线的功能尚不确定。在没有收缩组织的情况下,它们不可能用来抓住其他直立的结构,而且海龙类不需要帮助来保持平衡,它们的姿势是由可变异的胶原组织维持的。有可能,但可能性不大,它们的作用可能是将食流引向冠部。最有可能的情况是,与后古生代的异长类类似,茎干就像一条 "传送带",当更多的柱状体插入时,近端、放射状和直立的部分就会被带离杯状体,最终形成一个远端、后倾的附着结构。细长的辐射状突起可以稳定远端,但与等轴类不同的是,Macrostylocrinus属的臂不适合爬行,因此无法躲避捕食者。M.silurocirrifer(模式种)和M.cirrifer都被归入Macrostylocrinus ( Scotimacrostylocrinus ) subgen.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scottish Journal of Geology
Scottish Journal of Geology 地学-地质学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Although published only since 1965, the Scottish Journal of Geology has a long pedigree. It is the joint publication of the Geological Society of Glasgow and the Edinburgh Geological Society, which prior to 1965 published separate Transactions: from 1860 in the case of Glasgow and 1863 for Edinburgh. Traditionally, the Journal has acted as the focus for papers on all aspects of Scottish geology and its contiguous areas, including the surrounding seas. The publication policy has always been outward looking, with the Editors encouraging review papers and papers on broader aspects of the Earth sciences that cannot be discussed solely in terms of Scottish geology. The diverse geology of Scotland continues to provide an important natural laboratory for the study of earth sciences; many seminal studies in geology have been carried out on Scottish rocks, and over the years the results of much of this work had been published in the Journal and its predecessors. The Journal fully deserves its high reputation worldwide and intends to maintain its status in the front rank of publications in the Earth sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信