Evaluation of Covid-19 Vaccine Sentiment on TikTok from 2020 to 2022

Riley P. Parks, Joshua K. Kepler, Loren G. Yamamoto
{"title":"Evaluation of Covid-19 Vaccine Sentiment on TikTok from 2020 to 2022","authors":"Riley P. Parks, Joshua K. Kepler, Loren G. Yamamoto","doi":"10.58624/svoapd.2023.02.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The unprecedented spread of misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic was largely driven by social media platforms. Public understanding of masking, viral transmission, treatment options for COVID, and vaccination were distorted by the influence of social media platforms. The pandemic saw a rise of TikTok, another social media platform, whose role in the dissemination of misinformation has been far less studied. The relatively new social medial platform boasts millions of monthly U.S. users, with a large portion of those users being impressionable children, teens, and young adults. Given its popularity, its role in the spread of misinformation is likely substantial. The purpose of this study is to assess the quantity of COVID misinformation on TikTok in the period of 2020 to 2022, looking specifically at the number of anti- and pro-vaccine videos appearing on the platform. By assessing the impact severity of the anti-vaccine content on TikTok, this study will be able to inform future public health efforts of these effects, with the goal of curtailing the spread of medical misinformation. Methods: Videos were collected from the app by the research team retrospectively using four sets of search terms that appear frequently in pro and anti-vaccine related content. Researchers judged the videos as anti- or pro-vaccine while recording metrics on the videos such as likes and bookmarks. A total of 284 videos were selected for analysis. Comparisons were made between likes and the other metrics using p-values for significance. Results: 109 anti- and 175 pro-vaccine videos were identified. A larger share of the data set was pro vaccine. There was no significant difference between the number of likes between anti- and pro-vaccine content. Conclusion: This study took a novel approach to TikTok by examining videos using multiple search terms over the course of a three-year period. The lack of statistical significance in number of likes between anti- and pro-vaccine content, despite there being more pro-vaccine videos is indicative of pervasive misinformation is on TikTok. Ambivalence over medical facts is not reassuring for any public health effort. Our analysis found a larger share of misinformation than previous studies, providing further evidence that a supra-dominant positive narrative on social media platforms is difficult to achieve, even though this is critical for health care initiatives.","PeriodicalId":382758,"journal":{"name":"SVOA Paediatrics","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SVOA Paediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58624/svoapd.2023.02.052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The unprecedented spread of misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic was largely driven by social media platforms. Public understanding of masking, viral transmission, treatment options for COVID, and vaccination were distorted by the influence of social media platforms. The pandemic saw a rise of TikTok, another social media platform, whose role in the dissemination of misinformation has been far less studied. The relatively new social medial platform boasts millions of monthly U.S. users, with a large portion of those users being impressionable children, teens, and young adults. Given its popularity, its role in the spread of misinformation is likely substantial. The purpose of this study is to assess the quantity of COVID misinformation on TikTok in the period of 2020 to 2022, looking specifically at the number of anti- and pro-vaccine videos appearing on the platform. By assessing the impact severity of the anti-vaccine content on TikTok, this study will be able to inform future public health efforts of these effects, with the goal of curtailing the spread of medical misinformation. Methods: Videos were collected from the app by the research team retrospectively using four sets of search terms that appear frequently in pro and anti-vaccine related content. Researchers judged the videos as anti- or pro-vaccine while recording metrics on the videos such as likes and bookmarks. A total of 284 videos were selected for analysis. Comparisons were made between likes and the other metrics using p-values for significance. Results: 109 anti- and 175 pro-vaccine videos were identified. A larger share of the data set was pro vaccine. There was no significant difference between the number of likes between anti- and pro-vaccine content. Conclusion: This study took a novel approach to TikTok by examining videos using multiple search terms over the course of a three-year period. The lack of statistical significance in number of likes between anti- and pro-vaccine content, despite there being more pro-vaccine videos is indicative of pervasive misinformation is on TikTok. Ambivalence over medical facts is not reassuring for any public health effort. Our analysis found a larger share of misinformation than previous studies, providing further evidence that a supra-dominant positive narrative on social media platforms is difficult to achieve, even though this is critical for health care initiatives.
2020 至 2022 年 TikTok 上的 Covid-19 疫苗舆情评估
目的:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,社交媒体平台在很大程度上推动了前所未有的错误信息传播。由于社交媒体平台的影响,公众对掩蔽、病毒传播、COVID 治疗方案和疫苗接种的理解被扭曲。嘀嗒(TikTok)是另一个社交媒体平台,在此次疫情中崛起,但对其在传播错误信息方面的作用研究较少。这个相对较新的社交媒体平台每月拥有数百万美国用户,其中很大一部分是易受影响的儿童、青少年和年轻人。鉴于其受欢迎程度,它在错误信息传播中所起的作用可能很大。本研究的目的是评估 2020 年至 2022 年期间 TikTok 上 COVID 错误信息的数量,特别是该平台上出现的反疫苗和亲疫苗视频的数量。通过评估 TikTok 上反疫苗内容的影响严重程度,本研究将能够为未来的公共卫生工作提供有关这些影响的信息,从而达到遏制医疗错误信息传播的目的。研究方法研究小组使用支持和反对疫苗相关内容中经常出现的四组搜索词,回顾性地从应用程序中收集视频。研究人员判断视频是反疫苗还是支持疫苗,同时记录视频的各项指标,如点赞数和书签数。研究人员共选取了 284 个视频进行分析。使用 P 值对点赞数和其他指标进行比较,以确定其显著性。结果如下确定了 109 个反疫苗视频和 175 个支持疫苗视频。数据集中支持疫苗的比例较大。反疫苗内容和支持疫苗内容的点赞数没有明显差异。结论这项研究采用了一种新颖的方法,通过使用多个搜索词对 TikTok 三年内的视频进行了研究。尽管支持疫苗的视频更多,但反疫苗和支持疫苗内容的点赞数在统计学上并不显著,这表明错误信息在 TikTok 上无处不在。对于任何公共卫生工作来说,对医学事实的矛盾态度都不能让人放心。与之前的研究相比,我们的分析发现了更大比例的错误信息,这进一步证明了在社交媒体平台上很难实现超主导的正面叙述,尽管这对医疗保健活动至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信