Implementing quality-of-care during labour, childbirth, and early postnatal care, northeast Namibia: a quasi-experimental study

Gloria Mutimbwa Siseho, Thubelihle Mathole, Debra Jackson
{"title":"Implementing quality-of-care during labour, childbirth, and early postnatal care, northeast Namibia: a quasi-experimental study","authors":"Gloria Mutimbwa Siseho, Thubelihle Mathole, Debra Jackson","doi":"10.29392/001c.90725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Attention to quality-of-care is increasing in low- and-middle-income countries. Nevertheless, few studies exist on the impact of these approaches to caregiving. This paper presents results on the quality-of-care mothers and neonates receive during labour, childbirth, and early postnatal care, pre-and-post-implementation of the World Health Organization/United Nations Children’s Fund/United Population Fund (WHO/UNICEF/UNFPA) quality improvement interventions. A quasi-experimental study design was used to assess the quality-of-care measures/interventions around childbirth and the immediate postnatal care period; we purposively sampled a high-volume hospital, northeast Namibia. Using the Every Mother Every Newborn (EMEN) childbirth quantitative survey questionnaire, we interviewed (pre=100; post=102) women who delivered prior to their discharge home and observed (pre=53; post=60) different women at admission, of which 19 of 53 and 50 of 60, respectively, progressed to deliver on the same day of data collection. Twenty (pre) and 24 (post) staff, and one facility manager (pre-and-post) were also interviewed. Descriptive statistics were used to present results. Postintervention, we found improvements in most assessed quality-of-care measures/interventions, e.g., thorough drying (94.7-100%), babies placed skin-to-skin with their mothers (89.5-98%) and assessed for resuscitation (69.8-98%) needs. Monitoring labour using partograph remained low (11.3-19.3%). During admission, women’s history taking (75.5-95%), blood pressure (98.1%-100%), urine testing (77.4-93.3%), foetal heart rate (94.3-100%), abdominal (86.8-100%) and vaginal examinations (96.2-100%) all improved. Yet, quality-of-care gaps were identified for labour monitoring, and routine postnatal care. Less 50% of women received counselling on family planning (5.3-42%), postnatal care (5.3-40%), maternal (0-38%) and newborn (0-40%) danger signs. Women’s satisfaction with information on breastfeeding and post-partum care and hygiene was 48-56.9% and 41-43.0% respectively. This is the first study in Namibia to assess pre-and-post implementation of quality-of-care practices around childbirth, and postnatal period. Inconsistency and noteworthy quality-of-care gaps exist in the early postnatal care period. Postnatal care management and interpersonal communication skills trainings are likely to improve and sustain high evidence-based care beyond labour and delivery. The poor quality-of-care practices for labour and postnatal care requires further investigation.","PeriodicalId":73759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global health reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global health reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.90725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Attention to quality-of-care is increasing in low- and-middle-income countries. Nevertheless, few studies exist on the impact of these approaches to caregiving. This paper presents results on the quality-of-care mothers and neonates receive during labour, childbirth, and early postnatal care, pre-and-post-implementation of the World Health Organization/United Nations Children’s Fund/United Population Fund (WHO/UNICEF/UNFPA) quality improvement interventions. A quasi-experimental study design was used to assess the quality-of-care measures/interventions around childbirth and the immediate postnatal care period; we purposively sampled a high-volume hospital, northeast Namibia. Using the Every Mother Every Newborn (EMEN) childbirth quantitative survey questionnaire, we interviewed (pre=100; post=102) women who delivered prior to their discharge home and observed (pre=53; post=60) different women at admission, of which 19 of 53 and 50 of 60, respectively, progressed to deliver on the same day of data collection. Twenty (pre) and 24 (post) staff, and one facility manager (pre-and-post) were also interviewed. Descriptive statistics were used to present results. Postintervention, we found improvements in most assessed quality-of-care measures/interventions, e.g., thorough drying (94.7-100%), babies placed skin-to-skin with their mothers (89.5-98%) and assessed for resuscitation (69.8-98%) needs. Monitoring labour using partograph remained low (11.3-19.3%). During admission, women’s history taking (75.5-95%), blood pressure (98.1%-100%), urine testing (77.4-93.3%), foetal heart rate (94.3-100%), abdominal (86.8-100%) and vaginal examinations (96.2-100%) all improved. Yet, quality-of-care gaps were identified for labour monitoring, and routine postnatal care. Less 50% of women received counselling on family planning (5.3-42%), postnatal care (5.3-40%), maternal (0-38%) and newborn (0-40%) danger signs. Women’s satisfaction with information on breastfeeding and post-partum care and hygiene was 48-56.9% and 41-43.0% respectively. This is the first study in Namibia to assess pre-and-post implementation of quality-of-care practices around childbirth, and postnatal period. Inconsistency and noteworthy quality-of-care gaps exist in the early postnatal care period. Postnatal care management and interpersonal communication skills trainings are likely to improve and sustain high evidence-based care beyond labour and delivery. The poor quality-of-care practices for labour and postnatal care requires further investigation.
在纳米比亚东北部实施分娩、生产和产后早期护理期间的护理质量:准实验研究
在中低收入国家,对护理质量的关注与日俱增。然而,有关这些护理方法的影响的研究却很少。本文介绍了世界卫生组织/联合国儿童基金会/联合国人口基金(WHO/UNICEF/UNFPA)质量改进干预措施实施前后,母亲和新生儿在分娩、生产和产后早期护理过程中获得的护理质量。我们采用了准实验研究设计来评估围绕分娩和产后护理期的护理质量措施/干预;我们有目的地在纳米比亚东北部的一家大医院取样。我们使用 "每个母亲每个新生儿"(EMEN)分娩定量调查问卷,对出院回家前分娩的产妇进行了访谈(访谈前=100;访谈后=102),并对入院时的不同产妇进行了观察(访谈前=53;访谈后=60),其中 53 名产妇中的 19 名和 60 名产妇中的 50 名分别在数据收集当天进行了分娩。此外,还对 20 名(入院前)和 24 名(入院后)工作人员以及一名设施管理人员(入院前和入院后)进行了访谈。我们使用了描述性统计来呈现结果。干预后,我们发现大多数评估的护理质量措施/干预措施都有所改善,例如彻底擦干(94.7%-100%)、婴儿与母亲肌肤接触(89.5%-98%)和复苏需求评估(69.8%-98%)。使用分 娩图监测分娩的比例仍然很低(11.3%-19.3%)。入院期间,产妇的病史采集(75.5%-95%)、血压(98.1%-100%)、尿检(77.4%-93.3%)、胎心率(94.3%-100%)、腹部检查(86.8%-100%)和阴道检查(96.2%-100%)均有所改善。然而,在产程监测和常规产后护理方面仍存在护理质量差距。接受计划生育(5.3-42%)、产后护理(5.3-40%)、孕产妇(0-38%)和新生儿(0-40%)危险信号咨询的妇女不到 50%。妇女对母乳喂养和产后护理及卫生信息的满意度分别为 48-56.9% 和 41-43.0%。这是纳米比亚首次对分娩和产后护理质量实施前后进行评估的研究。产后早期护理存在不一致和值得注意的护理质量差距。产后护理管理和人际沟通技能培训有可能改善和维持分娩和接生后的高循证护理。产程和产后护理质量差的问题需要进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信