Concrete Impacts: Blast Walls, Wartime Emissions, and the US Occupation of Iraq

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Antipode Pub Date : 2023-12-11 DOI:10.1111/anti.13006
Benjamin Neimark, Oliver Belcher, Kirsti Ashworth, Reuben Larbi
{"title":"Concrete Impacts: Blast Walls, Wartime Emissions, and the US Occupation of Iraq","authors":"Benjamin Neimark,&nbsp;Oliver Belcher,&nbsp;Kirsti Ashworth,&nbsp;Reuben Larbi","doi":"10.1111/anti.13006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Militaries around the world are a major source of carbon emissions, yet very little is known about their carbon footprint. Reliable data around military resource use and environmental damage is highly variable. Researchers are dependent upon military transparency, the context of military operations, and broader emissions reporting. While studies are beginning to emerge on global militaries and their carbon footprints, less work has focused on wartime emissions. We examine one sliver of the hidden carbon emissions of late-modern warfare by focusing on the use of concrete “blast walls” by US forces in Baghdad over a five-year period (2003–2008). This study uses a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to study one of the world's largest military carbon footprints of concrete, an infrastructural weapon in late-modern urban counterinsurgencies. Moving beyond dominant discourses on climate-security and “greening”, we present one of the first studies to expose <i>direct</i> and <i>indirect</i> military emissions resulting from combat.</p>","PeriodicalId":8241,"journal":{"name":"Antipode","volume":"56 3","pages":"983-1005"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anti.13006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antipode","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anti.13006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Militaries around the world are a major source of carbon emissions, yet very little is known about their carbon footprint. Reliable data around military resource use and environmental damage is highly variable. Researchers are dependent upon military transparency, the context of military operations, and broader emissions reporting. While studies are beginning to emerge on global militaries and their carbon footprints, less work has focused on wartime emissions. We examine one sliver of the hidden carbon emissions of late-modern warfare by focusing on the use of concrete “blast walls” by US forces in Baghdad over a five-year period (2003–2008). This study uses a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to study one of the world's largest military carbon footprints of concrete, an infrastructural weapon in late-modern urban counterinsurgencies. Moving beyond dominant discourses on climate-security and “greening”, we present one of the first studies to expose direct and indirect military emissions resulting from combat.

Abstract Image

混凝土的影响:防爆墙、战时排放物和美国对伊拉克的占领
世界各地的军队都是碳排放的主要来源,但人们对其碳足迹却知之甚少。有关军事资源使用和环境破坏的可靠数据非常不稳定。研究人员依赖于军事透明度、军事行动背景以及更广泛的排放报告。虽然有关全球军队及其碳足迹的研究已经开始出现,但关注战时排放的研究较少。我们通过关注美军在巴格达五年(2003-2008 年)内使用混凝土 "防爆墙 "的情况,研究了后期现代战争中隐性碳排放的一小部分。本研究采用生命周期评估(LCA)方法,研究了世界上最大的混凝土军事碳足迹之一,这是晚期现代城市反叛乱中的一种基础设施武器。我们超越了关于气候安全和 "绿化 "的主流论述,提出了首批揭示作战造成的直接和间接军事排放的研究之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antipode
Antipode GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Antipode has published dissenting scholarship that explores and utilizes key geographical ideas like space, scale, place, borders and landscape. It aims to challenge dominant and orthodox views of the world through debate, scholarship and politically-committed research, creating new spaces and envisioning new futures. Antipode welcomes the infusion of new ideas and the shaking up of old positions, without being committed to just one view of radical analysis or politics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信