The Belarusian People’s Republic in the Politics of the UK (December 1919–July 1920): Based on Documents from the National Archives in London

A.M. Dubrouka, U. Snapkouski
{"title":"The Belarusian People’s Republic in the Politics of the UK (December 1919–July 1920): Based on Documents from the National Archives in London","authors":"A.M. Dubrouka, U. Snapkouski","doi":"10.30965/20526512-bja10018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe authors introduce into scientific circulation some archival documents that reflect the United Kingdom’s policy in relation to the establishment of an independent Belarusian national state after the First World War. It is shown that on the eve of the Paris Peace Conference, the UK viewed Belarus as a territory whose population was ethnically Russian, not a nation with its own identity and national movement. The British therefore did not considered it as a potential territory for the creation of a Belarusian national state. During the conference, the “Belarusian question” was discussed by UK only in terms of which state—Russia, Poland or Lithuania—the Belarusian territories should be attached to, or whether they must somehow be divided. The documents presented show that British diplomacy and British intelligence treated political and military figures from the Belarusian People’s Republic with suspicion. This position of the United Kingdom appeared crucial for the Governments of Finland and Denmark in their refusal of full international recognition of the Belarusian People’s Republic (Belaruskaya Narodnaya Respublica; hereinafter referred to as BNR).","PeriodicalId":277512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Belarusian Studies","volume":"20 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Belarusian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/20526512-bja10018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors introduce into scientific circulation some archival documents that reflect the United Kingdom’s policy in relation to the establishment of an independent Belarusian national state after the First World War. It is shown that on the eve of the Paris Peace Conference, the UK viewed Belarus as a territory whose population was ethnically Russian, not a nation with its own identity and national movement. The British therefore did not considered it as a potential territory for the creation of a Belarusian national state. During the conference, the “Belarusian question” was discussed by UK only in terms of which state—Russia, Poland or Lithuania—the Belarusian territories should be attached to, or whether they must somehow be divided. The documents presented show that British diplomacy and British intelligence treated political and military figures from the Belarusian People’s Republic with suspicion. This position of the United Kingdom appeared crucial for the Governments of Finland and Denmark in their refusal of full international recognition of the Belarusian People’s Republic (Belaruskaya Narodnaya Respublica; hereinafter referred to as BNR).
英国政治中的白俄罗斯人民共和国(1919 年 12 月至 1920 年 7 月):基于伦敦国家档案馆的文件
作者将一些反映联合王国在第一次世界大战后建立独立的白俄罗斯民族国家的政策的档案文件引入科学领域。文件显示,在巴黎和会前夕,英国将白俄罗斯视为一块人口为俄罗斯族的领土,而不是一个拥有自己身份和民族运动的国家。因此,英国不认为白俄罗斯是建立白俄罗斯民族国家的潜在领土。会议期间,英国在讨论 "白俄罗斯问题 "时只考虑了白俄罗斯领土应归属哪个国家--俄罗斯、波兰或立陶宛,或者是否必须以某种方式将其分割。所提交的文件表明,英国外交部门和英国情报部门对白俄罗斯人民共和国的政治和军事人物持怀疑态度。联合王国的这一立场对芬兰和丹麦政府拒绝国际社会全面承认白俄罗斯人民共和国(Belaruskaya Narodnaya Respublica;以下简称 BNR)至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信