Impact of intensified prevention measures on the rate of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections among mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients

Shimrit Lampl, Yael Cohen, Yasmin Maor, Debby Ben-David
{"title":"Impact of intensified prevention measures on the rate of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections among mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients","authors":"Shimrit Lampl, Yael Cohen, Yasmin Maor, Debby Ben-David","doi":"10.1017/ash.2023.505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased rates of hospital-acquired infections. During the early months of the pandemic, we observed high rates of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (HA-BSIs) among COVID-19 patients, prompting the implementation of intensified prevention measures. Objectives: To assess the prevalence of HA-BSI among mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients, identify risk factors, and evaluate the effect of prevention measures. Methods: We conducted a retrospective matched case-control study in adult medical step-up units between March 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021. We matched mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients with ventilated non-COVID-19 patients based on age group and length of stay before ventilation. In response to the high rates of HA-BSI among COVID-19 patients, a comprehensive infection control intervention was implemented. Results: A total of 136 COVID-19 patients were matched with 136 non-COVID-19 patients. No significant differences were observed in pre-hospitalization characteristics. The central venous catheter utilization ratio was higher in COVID-19 patients (83.6%) versus 35.6% in the control group (p < 0.001). During pre-intervention, 35.2% (32/91) of COVID-19 patients developed HA-BSI, compared to 17.8% (13/73) in the control group (p < 0.001). Following the intervention, no significant difference was observed between the groups (17.8% (8/45) versus 15.9% (10 /63), p = 0.79). In a multivariate analysis, HA-BSI was associated with low body mass index (OR 0.9 (95% CI 0.9–1.0), p = 0.015)) and presence of temporary dialysis catheter (OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.0–7.3), p = 0.05)). Conclusions: Mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients were at higher risk for developing HA-BSI compared to non-COVID-19 patients. Intensified prevention measures were associated with decreased rates of HA-BSI.","PeriodicalId":7953,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology","volume":"47 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased rates of hospital-acquired infections. During the early months of the pandemic, we observed high rates of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (HA-BSIs) among COVID-19 patients, prompting the implementation of intensified prevention measures. Objectives: To assess the prevalence of HA-BSI among mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients, identify risk factors, and evaluate the effect of prevention measures. Methods: We conducted a retrospective matched case-control study in adult medical step-up units between March 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021. We matched mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients with ventilated non-COVID-19 patients based on age group and length of stay before ventilation. In response to the high rates of HA-BSI among COVID-19 patients, a comprehensive infection control intervention was implemented. Results: A total of 136 COVID-19 patients were matched with 136 non-COVID-19 patients. No significant differences were observed in pre-hospitalization characteristics. The central venous catheter utilization ratio was higher in COVID-19 patients (83.6%) versus 35.6% in the control group (p < 0.001). During pre-intervention, 35.2% (32/91) of COVID-19 patients developed HA-BSI, compared to 17.8% (13/73) in the control group (p < 0.001). Following the intervention, no significant difference was observed between the groups (17.8% (8/45) versus 15.9% (10 /63), p = 0.79). In a multivariate analysis, HA-BSI was associated with low body mass index (OR 0.9 (95% CI 0.9–1.0), p = 0.015)) and presence of temporary dialysis catheter (OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.0–7.3), p = 0.05)). Conclusions: Mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients were at higher risk for developing HA-BSI compared to non-COVID-19 patients. Intensified prevention measures were associated with decreased rates of HA-BSI.
强化预防措施对 COVID-19 机械通气患者院内获得性血流感染率的影响
摘要 背景:COVID-19 大流行与医院获得性感染率上升有关。在大流行的最初几个月,我们观察到 COVID-19 患者的医院获得性血流感染(HA-BSI)率很高,这促使我们采取了强化预防措施。目的评估 COVID-19 机械通气患者中的 HA-BSI 感染率,确定风险因素并评估预防措施的效果。方法我们在 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2021 年 3 月 31 日期间对成人医疗加强病房进行了一项回顾性匹配病例对照研究。我们根据年龄组和通气前的住院时间,将接受过 COVID-19 机械通气的患者与未接受过 COVID-19 机械通气的患者进行了配对。鉴于 COVID-19 患者的 HA-BSI 感染率较高,我们实施了一项全面的感染控制干预措施。结果:共有 136 名 COVID-19 患者与 136 名非 COVID-19 患者进行了配对。入院前特征无明显差异。COVID-19 患者的中心静脉导管使用率(83.6%)高于对照组的 35.6%(P < 0.001)。在干预前,35.2%(32/91)的 COVID-19 患者发生了 HA-BSI,而对照组为 17.8%(13/73)(p < 0.001)。干预后,两组间未观察到明显差异(17.8%(8/45)对15.9%(10/63),p = 0.79)。在多变量分析中,HA-BSI 与低体重指数(OR 0.9 (95% CI 0.9-1.0),p = 0.015)和存在临时透析导管(OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.0-7.3),p = 0.05)相关。)结论与非 COVID-19 患者相比,机械通气的 COVID-19 患者发生 HA-BSI 的风险更高。加强预防措施与降低 HA-BSI 发生率有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信