More is more: toddlers do not show choice overload

Romulus J. Castelo, Seokyung Kim, Stephanie M. Carlson
{"title":"More is more: toddlers do not show choice overload","authors":"Romulus J. Castelo, Seokyung Kim, Stephanie M. Carlson","doi":"10.3389/fdpys.2023.1317426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Psychological theory and research demonstrate the positive effects of personal choice on human motivation. However, there is evidence in adults that an overabundance of options can lead to choice overload, when choices become demotivating. Little is known about the early development of behaviors involving choice. Across two studies, we investigated whether toddlers (M age = 2.5 years) preferred choice over non-choice and tested for the presence of choice overload using a novel sticker-book task. Moreover, we explored associations between children's executive function (EF) skills and choice preference behavior. In Study 1 (N = 106), children preferred choice on 70% of trials, and this preference increased as a function of the number of options from 2-26. There was no evidence of choice overload. Study 2 (N = 52) replicated findings from Study 1 with up to 53 options, but there was no linear effect. Age (inversely) and sex (female) predicted choice preference in Study 2. Some aspects of parent-reported EF were inversely related to children's preference for choice, whereas a direct assessment of EF was positively correlated, independent of age. Future research should test for choice overload using alternative measures with a wider age range and clarify associations between EF and choice preference.","PeriodicalId":424048,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Developmental Psychology","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdpys.2023.1317426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psychological theory and research demonstrate the positive effects of personal choice on human motivation. However, there is evidence in adults that an overabundance of options can lead to choice overload, when choices become demotivating. Little is known about the early development of behaviors involving choice. Across two studies, we investigated whether toddlers (M age = 2.5 years) preferred choice over non-choice and tested for the presence of choice overload using a novel sticker-book task. Moreover, we explored associations between children's executive function (EF) skills and choice preference behavior. In Study 1 (N = 106), children preferred choice on 70% of trials, and this preference increased as a function of the number of options from 2-26. There was no evidence of choice overload. Study 2 (N = 52) replicated findings from Study 1 with up to 53 options, but there was no linear effect. Age (inversely) and sex (female) predicted choice preference in Study 2. Some aspects of parent-reported EF were inversely related to children's preference for choice, whereas a direct assessment of EF was positively correlated, independent of age. Future research should test for choice overload using alternative measures with a wider age range and clarify associations between EF and choice preference.
多多益善:幼儿不会出现选择过多的情况
心理学理论和研究表明,个人选择对人的动机有积极影响。然而,有证据表明,在成年人身上,过多的选择会导致选择超载,这时选择就会失去动力。人们对涉及选择的行为的早期发展知之甚少。在两项研究中,我们调查了幼儿(平均年龄 = 2.5 岁)是否更喜欢选择而非非选择,并使用新颖的贴纸书任务测试了是否存在选择超载。此外,我们还探讨了儿童的执行功能(EF)技能与选择偏好行为之间的关联。在研究 1(N = 106)中,儿童在 70% 的试验中偏好选择,而且这种偏好随着 2-26 个选项数量的增加而增加。没有证据表明存在选择超载现象。研究 2(N = 52)重复了研究 1 的结果,最多有 53 个选项,但没有线性效应。在研究 2 中,年龄(成反比)和性别(女性)预测了选择偏好。家长报告的某些EF与儿童的选择偏好成反比,而对EF的直接评估则与年龄成正比。未来的研究应使用其他测量方法,在更大的年龄范围内测试选择超载,并澄清EF与选择偏好之间的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信