Brazil’s Return to the Hunger Map: An Analysis of Public Policies and Effective Measures for Food Security

IF 1.3 Q1 LAW
Laws Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.3390/laws12060090
Ana Tereza Souza Domingos, Carolina Oliveira Mesquita, Emiliano Lobo de Godoi, T. Mendes
{"title":"Brazil’s Return to the Hunger Map: An Analysis of Public Policies and Effective Measures for Food Security","authors":"Ana Tereza Souza Domingos, Carolina Oliveira Mesquita, Emiliano Lobo de Godoi, T. Mendes","doi":"10.3390/laws12060090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The planning and application of public policies in the panorama of the right to adequate food stands out for the development of the food supply of the Brazilian population. However, it is questionable whether these public policies have been effective in contributing to adequate nutrition. The aim of this article is to study the effectiveness of public food security policies in Brazil between 2012 and 2022. Also, urban agriculture is analyzed as an alternative food policy that can be carried out by the population, and contributes to the use of urban space. To understand the country’s food security situation and the effectiveness of public policies in avoiding a scenario of hunger and insecurity, the hypothetical-deductive method and the technique of bibliographical and documentary research are used, together with the theoretical framework in the theory of the cycle of public policies. It is concluded that the public policies developed were gradually weakened, and that between 2019 and 2022, the Brazilian government took measures discouraging the implementation of food policies. Brazil, with disjointed policies, facing the pandemic and an economic crisis, is in a situation of food insecurity and has portions of the population in a situation of hunger.","PeriodicalId":30534,"journal":{"name":"Laws","volume":"22 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laws","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12060090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The planning and application of public policies in the panorama of the right to adequate food stands out for the development of the food supply of the Brazilian population. However, it is questionable whether these public policies have been effective in contributing to adequate nutrition. The aim of this article is to study the effectiveness of public food security policies in Brazil between 2012 and 2022. Also, urban agriculture is analyzed as an alternative food policy that can be carried out by the population, and contributes to the use of urban space. To understand the country’s food security situation and the effectiveness of public policies in avoiding a scenario of hunger and insecurity, the hypothetical-deductive method and the technique of bibliographical and documentary research are used, together with the theoretical framework in the theory of the cycle of public policies. It is concluded that the public policies developed were gradually weakened, and that between 2019 and 2022, the Brazilian government took measures discouraging the implementation of food policies. Brazil, with disjointed policies, facing the pandemic and an economic crisis, is in a situation of food insecurity and has portions of the population in a situation of hunger.
巴西重返饥饿地图:粮食安全公共政策和有效措施分析
在适足食物权的大背景下,公共政策的规划和实施在发展巴西人口的食物供应方面显得尤为突出。然而,这些公共政策是否有效地促进了充足的营养却令人怀疑。本文旨在研究 2012 年至 2022 年巴西公共粮食安全政策的有效性。此外,文章还分析了城市农业,将其视为一种可由民众实施的替代性粮食政策,有助于城市空间的利用。为了解巴西的粮食安全状况以及公共政策在避免饥饿和不安全状况方面的有效性,采用了假设-演绎法、书目和文献研究技术以及公共政策周期理论框架。结论是,已制定的公共政策逐渐被削弱,在 2019 年至 2022 年期间,巴西政府采取了阻碍实施粮食政策的措施。政策脱节、面临大流行病和经济危机的巴西正处于粮食不安全状态,部分人口处于饥饿状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laws
Laws LAW-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
77
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信