{"title":"Intraovarian platelet-rich plasma injection in poor responders","authors":"L. Devenutto","doi":"10.58779/issn.2954-467x.tjor2023.v2.n3.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: \nTo evaluate if it possible to improve ovarian reserve parameters and oocyte retrieval in poor responders who undergo intraovarian injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP). \nDesign: \nProspective cohort study. We included 148 poor responders who underwent PRP injection between October 2021 and December 2022 in our institution, comparing pre and post PRP ovarian function. In addition, the IVF outcomes of a subgroup of patients was studied after the intervention in contrast with the previous treatment. \nResults: \nAn improvement in ovarian reserve was observed in relation to previous values: FSH (13,57 vs. 11,32, p=0,11), AMH (0,39 vs. 0,48, p=0,06), antral follicle count (3,98 vs. 5,75, p<0,001); as well as a higher number of oocytes retrieved (2,63 vs. 3,65, p=0,01) and produced embryos (1,64 vs. 2,22, p=0,03); without a great impact on pregnancy rates. \nConclusions: \nAlthough experimental, intraovarian PRP could restore ovarian function and be postulated as an alternative to oocyte donation in patients with low ovarian reserve who do not accept this treatment. There is a lack of randomized controlled trials to support these findings.","PeriodicalId":494727,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Reproduction","volume":"19 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58779/issn.2954-467x.tjor2023.v2.n3.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective:
To evaluate if it possible to improve ovarian reserve parameters and oocyte retrieval in poor responders who undergo intraovarian injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP).
Design:
Prospective cohort study. We included 148 poor responders who underwent PRP injection between October 2021 and December 2022 in our institution, comparing pre and post PRP ovarian function. In addition, the IVF outcomes of a subgroup of patients was studied after the intervention in contrast with the previous treatment.
Results:
An improvement in ovarian reserve was observed in relation to previous values: FSH (13,57 vs. 11,32, p=0,11), AMH (0,39 vs. 0,48, p=0,06), antral follicle count (3,98 vs. 5,75, p<0,001); as well as a higher number of oocytes retrieved (2,63 vs. 3,65, p=0,01) and produced embryos (1,64 vs. 2,22, p=0,03); without a great impact on pregnancy rates.
Conclusions:
Although experimental, intraovarian PRP could restore ovarian function and be postulated as an alternative to oocyte donation in patients with low ovarian reserve who do not accept this treatment. There is a lack of randomized controlled trials to support these findings.
目的评估对卵巢内注射富血小板血浆(PRP)反应不佳者是否有可能改善卵巢储备参数和卵母细胞检索。设计:前瞻性队列研究前瞻性队列研究。我们纳入了2021年10月至2022年12月期间在我院接受PRP注射的148名反应不佳者,比较了PRP前后的卵巢功能。 此外,我们还研究了干预后与之前治疗相比,一部分患者的试管婴儿结果。研究结果与之前的数值相比,卵巢储备功能有所改善:FSH(13.57 vs. 11.32,p=0.11)、AMH(0.39 vs. 0.48,p=0.06)、前卵泡数(3.98 vs. 5.75,p<0.001);以及取卵数(2.63 vs. 3.65,p=0.01)和产出胚胎数(1.64 vs. 2.22,p=0.03)均有所提高;但对妊娠率无重大影响。结论尽管是实验性的,但卵巢内 PRP 可恢复卵巢功能,对于卵巢储备功能低下且不接受卵母细胞捐献的患者来说,可作为卵母细胞捐献的替代方案。目前还缺乏随机对照试验来支持这些研究结果。