Position of religious interactions in the paradigm of juridical social work: an assessment attempt

Waldemar Woźniak
{"title":"Position of religious interactions in the paradigm of juridical social work: an assessment attempt","authors":"Waldemar Woźniak","doi":"10.34766/fetr.v56i4.1239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correctional and psychocorrectional work with different categories of socially maladjusted people, especially prisoners and juveniles in specific resocialization facilities, can be performed using different approaches or models. Working with these people is extremely difficult, because in their axiological functioning, they often follow anti-values, have difficulty complying with social, moral, and legal norms, and are often characterized by demanding attitudes. In Poland, the term resocialization is commonly used to refer to working with prisoners or juvenile wards of correctional institutions. The present paper discusses in detail three paradigms of interventions towards people who have come into conflict with the law, or in general towards people who are not adapted to social functioning, that is, living by the moral, social, and legal norms that are used and generally accepted by society. These are classical resocialization, juridical social work, and social rehabilitation paradigms. In a given paradigm, certain forms of work will be preferred. Methodology of working with socially maladjusted, or resocialization methodology, involves the functions, principles, and methods of this work. Methods of correctional work (methods of resocialization) have a psychotechnical (individual, and at the same time psychological or psychotherapeutic), sociotechnical (working with a group or using interactions through a group), or culture-technical character (learning, e.g., at school, work, contact with culture as a recipient or creator). Various religious interactions should also be considered a culture-technical method. Not all inmates or wards of correctional facilities have a negative attitude toward religion or specialized (penitentiary, facility) prison ministry. Many of them see the value in religious interactions as helpful. Religious practices help them function socially, although to obtain given benefits, the inmates or wards may manipulate their religious commitment, which may turn out to be a sham commitment. The professional work of the author of the present paper has allowed him to conduct many years of observation among inmates in penitentiary units or among those placed in juvenile institutions of the justice department. The results of this observation provided a basis for placing religious interventions not in the paradigm of classical resocialization but in juridical social work. \n ","PeriodicalId":331430,"journal":{"name":"Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et Ratio","volume":"56 S68","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et Ratio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34766/fetr.v56i4.1239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Correctional and psychocorrectional work with different categories of socially maladjusted people, especially prisoners and juveniles in specific resocialization facilities, can be performed using different approaches or models. Working with these people is extremely difficult, because in their axiological functioning, they often follow anti-values, have difficulty complying with social, moral, and legal norms, and are often characterized by demanding attitudes. In Poland, the term resocialization is commonly used to refer to working with prisoners or juvenile wards of correctional institutions. The present paper discusses in detail three paradigms of interventions towards people who have come into conflict with the law, or in general towards people who are not adapted to social functioning, that is, living by the moral, social, and legal norms that are used and generally accepted by society. These are classical resocialization, juridical social work, and social rehabilitation paradigms. In a given paradigm, certain forms of work will be preferred. Methodology of working with socially maladjusted, or resocialization methodology, involves the functions, principles, and methods of this work. Methods of correctional work (methods of resocialization) have a psychotechnical (individual, and at the same time psychological or psychotherapeutic), sociotechnical (working with a group or using interactions through a group), or culture-technical character (learning, e.g., at school, work, contact with culture as a recipient or creator). Various religious interactions should also be considered a culture-technical method. Not all inmates or wards of correctional facilities have a negative attitude toward religion or specialized (penitentiary, facility) prison ministry. Many of them see the value in religious interactions as helpful. Religious practices help them function socially, although to obtain given benefits, the inmates or wards may manipulate their religious commitment, which may turn out to be a sham commitment. The professional work of the author of the present paper has allowed him to conduct many years of observation among inmates in penitentiary units or among those placed in juvenile institutions of the justice department. The results of this observation provided a basis for placing religious interventions not in the paradigm of classical resocialization but in juridical social work.  
宗教互动在司法社会工作范式中的地位:评估尝试
针对不同类别的社会适应不良者,特别是特定再社会化设施中的囚犯和青少年,可以采用不同的方法或模式开展矫治和心理矫治工作。与这些人一起工作是极其困难的,因为在他们的公理运作中,他们往往遵循反价值观,难以遵守社会、道德和法律规范,而且往往具有苛刻的态度。在波兰,"再社会化 "一词通常指的是与囚犯或惩教机构的少年犯打交道。本文详细讨论了对触犯法律的人,或一般而言对不适应社会功能的人,即按照社会使用和普遍接受的道德、社会和法律规范生活的人进行干预的三种模式。这就是经典的再社会化、司法社会工作和社会康复范式。在特定的范式中,某些工作形式会受到青睐。社会适应不良者的工作方法,或称再社会化方法,涉及这项工作的功能、原则和方法。矫治工作方法(再社会化方法)具有心理技术(个人,同时也是心理或心理治疗)、社会技 术(与群体一起工作或通过群体进行互动)或文化技术(学习,如在学校、工作中,作为接受 者或创造者与文化接触)的特点。各种宗教互动也应被视为一种文化技术方法。并不是所有的囚犯或教养机构的囚犯都对宗教或专门的(监狱、教养机构)监狱牧师持否定态度。他们中的许多人认为宗教互动很有价值。宗教活动有助于他们的社会功能,尽管为了获得特定的利益,囚犯或被监护人可能会操纵他们的宗教承诺,这可能会变成一种虚假的承诺。本文作者的专业工作使他能够对监狱中的囚犯或司法部门少年犯管教所中的囚犯进行多年的观察。这些观察结果为我们提供了一个依据,使我们能够不把宗教干预置于传统的再社会化范式中,而是将其置于司法社会工作中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信