Reconciling Teachers’ Views and Practices with Early Graders’ Ability to Engage in Scientific Inquiry

Mjege Kinyota
{"title":"Reconciling Teachers’ Views and Practices with Early Graders’ Ability to Engage in Scientific Inquiry","authors":"Mjege Kinyota","doi":"10.33828/sei.v34.i4.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study used a three-phase design to explore how teachers’ views and practices of scientific inquiry can be reconciled with early graders’ ability to engage in scientific inquiry. First, 19 early years teachers were interviewed to explore their views and practices of scientific inquiry. Second, six standard two students were exposed to a problem-solving situation so that their ability to engage in scientific inquiry could be assessed. Finally, six standard two teachers who involved in designing the problem and who also observed students solving the problem were interviewed to explore any changes in their views. The six teachers also participated during the first phase. The findings indicated that teachers had distrust in early graders’ ability to engage in scientific inquiry, which corresponded to their rare practice of it. They also perceived large class sizes and unsupportive curriculum as barriers to engaging children in scientific inquiry. Further, the findings indicated that, under specific conditions, early graders are able to engage in some inquiry activities such as framing questions, designing and conducting investigations. Furthermore, changes in teachers’ beliefs and understanding of scientific inquiry were noted. Creating supportive curriculum and classroom environments for nurturing children’s inquiry are highly recommended.","PeriodicalId":156311,"journal":{"name":"Science Education International","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Education International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v34.i4.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study used a three-phase design to explore how teachers’ views and practices of scientific inquiry can be reconciled with early graders’ ability to engage in scientific inquiry. First, 19 early years teachers were interviewed to explore their views and practices of scientific inquiry. Second, six standard two students were exposed to a problem-solving situation so that their ability to engage in scientific inquiry could be assessed. Finally, six standard two teachers who involved in designing the problem and who also observed students solving the problem were interviewed to explore any changes in their views. The six teachers also participated during the first phase. The findings indicated that teachers had distrust in early graders’ ability to engage in scientific inquiry, which corresponded to their rare practice of it. They also perceived large class sizes and unsupportive curriculum as barriers to engaging children in scientific inquiry. Further, the findings indicated that, under specific conditions, early graders are able to engage in some inquiry activities such as framing questions, designing and conducting investigations. Furthermore, changes in teachers’ beliefs and understanding of scientific inquiry were noted. Creating supportive curriculum and classroom environments for nurturing children’s inquiry are highly recommended.
将教师的观点和做法与低年级学生的科学探究能力相协调
本研究采用三阶段设计,探讨教师的科学探究观点和实践如何与低年级学生的科学探究能力相协调。首先,对 19 名低年级教师进行了访谈,以探讨他们对科学探究的看法和做法。其次,六名标准二年级学生被置于解决问题的情境中,以评估他们参与科学探究的能力。最后,对参与设计问题并观察学生解决问题的六位标准二教师进行了访谈,以探讨他们的观点是否发生了变化。这六位教师也参与了第一阶段的工作。调查结果表明,教师对低年级学生进行科学探究的能力不信任,这与他们很少进行科学探究的情况相吻合。他们还认为,班级人数过多和不支持的课程设置是儿童参与科学探究的障碍。此外,研究结果表明,在特定条件下,低年级学生能够参与一些探究活动,如提出问题、设计和开展调查。此外,教师对科学探究的信念和理解也发生了变化。我们强烈建议为培养儿童的探究能力创造有利的课程和课堂环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信