GENEALOGY OF UNIVERSITY ETHNOGRAPHY: DEPARTMENT, PERSONALITIES, TRADITION TRANSMISSION (TO THE 100th ANNIVERSARY OF THE BIRTH OF PROFESSOR G.E. MARKOV)

O.E. KAZ'MINA, Tatiana Dmitrievna Solovey
{"title":"GENEALOGY OF UNIVERSITY ETHNOGRAPHY:\nDEPARTMENT, PERSONALITIES, TRADITION\nTRANSMISSION (TO THE 100th ANNIVERSARY\nOF THE BIRTH OF PROFESSOR G.E. MARKOV)","authors":"O.E. KAZ'MINA, Tatiana Dmitrievna Solovey","doi":"10.55959/msu0130-0083-8-2023-64-3-97-121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is a tribute of respect to the memory of Gennady Evgenyevich Markov, a major Russian ethnologist, archaeologist and historian of primitive society, doctor in history, professor of the Department of Ethnology, Faculty of History, Lomonosov Moscow State University. The authors provide a detailed analysis of the scientific contribution and life path of the outstanding Soviet/Russian scholar and place their narrative in a broad socio-cultural and intellectual context of the country and society. G.E. Markov's biography is closely connected with the history of the Department of Ethnography/Ethnology at the Faculty of History, Moscow State University and serves as a serious basis for reconstructing the genesis of university ethnography and its dynamics over the course of nearly 85 years. Such a long period of existence of the university department and its sustainable effectiveness in training professional staff were essentially ensured by the high qualification of scientific and pedagogical staff, reliance on solid theoretical and methodological foundations and interdisciplinarity, a combination of conservatism with flexibility and adaptability to the challenges of the time, the ability to preserve disciplinary continuity and ensure the transmission of the scholarly tradition. All these components of the successful development of university ethnology are subjected to a comprehensive and balanced examination in the article. G.E. Markov's biography in all its typical and special manifestations forms the semantic core of the analysis and presentation. The authors offer their view on complex and sharply debatable issues of professional self-determination, the logic of scientific discovery, the correlation between field and desk research, the influence of ideology and politics on scientific thought. The article presents the authors' vision of the prospects for the development of the Department of Ethnology, based on a harmonious combination of ethnological and anthropological approaches to understanding the disciplinary framework, unconditional reliance on scholarly tradition and its authorities, the need to improve the methods of training in terms of instrumentality and practice-oriented nature, which will allow graduates of the department to be in demand and stay in the profession.","PeriodicalId":299303,"journal":{"name":"LOMONOSOV HISTORY JOURNAL","volume":"5 5‐6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LOMONOSOV HISTORY JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55959/msu0130-0083-8-2023-64-3-97-121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is a tribute of respect to the memory of Gennady Evgenyevich Markov, a major Russian ethnologist, archaeologist and historian of primitive society, doctor in history, professor of the Department of Ethnology, Faculty of History, Lomonosov Moscow State University. The authors provide a detailed analysis of the scientific contribution and life path of the outstanding Soviet/Russian scholar and place their narrative in a broad socio-cultural and intellectual context of the country and society. G.E. Markov's biography is closely connected with the history of the Department of Ethnography/Ethnology at the Faculty of History, Moscow State University and serves as a serious basis for reconstructing the genesis of university ethnography and its dynamics over the course of nearly 85 years. Such a long period of existence of the university department and its sustainable effectiveness in training professional staff were essentially ensured by the high qualification of scientific and pedagogical staff, reliance on solid theoretical and methodological foundations and interdisciplinarity, a combination of conservatism with flexibility and adaptability to the challenges of the time, the ability to preserve disciplinary continuity and ensure the transmission of the scholarly tradition. All these components of the successful development of university ethnology are subjected to a comprehensive and balanced examination in the article. G.E. Markov's biography in all its typical and special manifestations forms the semantic core of the analysis and presentation. The authors offer their view on complex and sharply debatable issues of professional self-determination, the logic of scientific discovery, the correlation between field and desk research, the influence of ideology and politics on scientific thought. The article presents the authors' vision of the prospects for the development of the Department of Ethnology, based on a harmonious combination of ethnological and anthropological approaches to understanding the disciplinary framework, unconditional reliance on scholarly tradition and its authorities, the need to improve the methods of training in terms of instrumentality and practice-oriented nature, which will allow graduates of the department to be in demand and stay in the profession.
大学人文科系系谱:系、人物、传统刊物(纪念格-埃-马尔科夫教授诞辰 100 周年)
这篇文章是对俄罗斯重要的民族学家、考古学家和原始社会历史学家、历史学博士、莫斯科国立罗蒙诺索夫大学历史系民族学教研室教授根纳季-叶夫根尼耶维奇-马尔科夫(Gennady Evgenyevich Markov)的缅怀。作者详细分析了这位杰出的苏联/俄罗斯学者的科学贡献和人生轨迹,并将其叙述置于国家和社会的广泛社会文化和知识背景中。G.E. 马尔科夫的传记与莫斯科国立大学历史系民族学/民族学教研室的历史密切相关,是重构大学民族学的起源及其近 85 年动态的重要依据。大学民族学系之所以能够存在如此之久,并在培养专业人员方面持续有效,主要得益于科学和教学人员的高素质、坚实的理论和方法论基础以及跨学科性、保守主义与灵活性的结合以及对时代挑战的适应性、保持学科连续性和确保学术传统传承的能力。文章对大学民族学成功发展的所有这些要素进行了全面、平衡的研究。G.E. 马尔科夫传记的所有典型和特殊表现形式构成了分析和介绍的语义核心。作者就专业自决、科学发现的逻辑、实地研究与案头研究之间的关联、意识形态和政治对科学思想的影响等复杂而又充满争议的问题提出了自己的观点。文章介绍了作者对民族学系发展前景的展望,其基础是和谐地结合民族学和人类学方法来理解学科框架,无条件地依赖学术传统及其权威,需要在工具性和面向实践的性质方面改进培训方法,这将使该系的毕业生能够满足需求并留在专业领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信