Optimal Video Length Effect on Flow Experience and Perceived Learning: A Repeated Measure Experimental Design with Randomization

Q3 Social Sciences
Ömer Demir, B. Birgili
{"title":"Optimal Video Length Effect on Flow Experience and Perceived Learning: A Repeated Measure Experimental Design with Randomization","authors":"Ömer Demir, B. Birgili","doi":"10.17275/per.24.9.11.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Videos are commonly used in education. Benefitting from instructional videos in learning processes empowers students’ academic outcomes. In spite of this, educators have no consensus on optimal video length. There is a need to cease speculations on optimal video length since most of them have been relying only on context-based tips or best practices. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to delve into the optimal video length discussion through the lens of perceived learning and flow experience. We employed repeated measure experimental design with randomization of treatment order for each participant. Twenty-eight university students from two big cities in Türkiye volunteered to participate in the study. Short, medium, and long videos were compared via Friedman test. Results of this study substantiated instructional video length does not seem to affect students’ perceived learning and their overall flow experience. However, they tend to concentrate and focus better on short videos. We call for an end to optimal video length discussion for videos shorter than 10 minutes, especially in terms of learning. The implications relying on the findings were discussed in terms of differences between “thinking to be in flow” and “being actually in flow.” The recommendations are given in detail in the full text.","PeriodicalId":36886,"journal":{"name":"Participatory Educational Research","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Participatory Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.9.11.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Videos are commonly used in education. Benefitting from instructional videos in learning processes empowers students’ academic outcomes. In spite of this, educators have no consensus on optimal video length. There is a need to cease speculations on optimal video length since most of them have been relying only on context-based tips or best practices. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to delve into the optimal video length discussion through the lens of perceived learning and flow experience. We employed repeated measure experimental design with randomization of treatment order for each participant. Twenty-eight university students from two big cities in Türkiye volunteered to participate in the study. Short, medium, and long videos were compared via Friedman test. Results of this study substantiated instructional video length does not seem to affect students’ perceived learning and their overall flow experience. However, they tend to concentrate and focus better on short videos. We call for an end to optimal video length discussion for videos shorter than 10 minutes, especially in terms of learning. The implications relying on the findings were discussed in terms of differences between “thinking to be in flow” and “being actually in flow.” The recommendations are given in detail in the full text.
最佳视频长度对流量体验和感知学习的影响:随机重复测量实验设计
视频在教育中应用广泛。在学习过程中利用教学视频可以提高学生的学习成绩。尽管如此,教育工作者对最佳视频长度仍未达成共识。有必要停止对最佳视频长度的猜测,因为大多数人只是依赖于基于情境的提示或最佳实践。因此,本研究旨在通过感知学习和流程体验的视角,深入探讨最佳视频长度。我们采用了重复测量实验设计,对每位参与者的处理顺序进行了随机化。来自土耳其两个大城市的 28 名大学生自愿参与了这项研究。通过弗里德曼检验对短、中、长视频进行了比较。研究结果表明,教学视频的长度似乎并不会影响学生的学习感知和整体流程体验。不过,他们在观看短视频时往往更集中注意力。我们呼吁结束对 10 分钟以下视频最佳长度的讨论,特别是在学习方面。我们从 "思考流动 "和 "实际流动 "之间的差异角度讨论了研究结果的意义。建议详见全文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Participatory Educational Research
Participatory Educational Research Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
147
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信