Stronger and more just? Recent reforms of China’s intellectual property rights system and their implications

IF 3.9 Q2 BUSINESS
Can Huang, Cong Cao, Wim Coreynen
{"title":"Stronger and more just? Recent reforms of China’s intellectual property rights system and their implications","authors":"Can Huang, Cong Cao, Wim Coreynen","doi":"10.1108/apjie-04-2023-0081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nSince 2015, China has made efforts to reform its intellectual property rights (IPR) system to better protect and stimulate innovation. These reforms are a result of the demand for more stringent intellectual property (IP) protection from China’s domestic, innovative industries and a measure to ease the pressure exerted by its foreign trading partners, particularly against the background of the US-China trade dispute that started at the beginning of 2018. This paper summarizes these reforms and their implications.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper combines a variety of sources, including academic articles, government websites, news reports, industry surveys and expert opinions, to offer insights in China’s IPR system and its recent reforms.\n\n\nFindings\nThis paper summarizes and discusses (1) the state’s law amendments, including the 2015 amendment of the “Law on Promoting the Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements”, the second amendment of the “Anti-Unfair Competition Law” with regard to trade secret protection, the fourth amendment of the “Patent Law”, and the legislations and regulations addressing the criticisms of the US administration over China’s so-called “forced” technology transfer policies; (2) the establishment of the specialized IP courts and tribunals since 2014; (3) the restructuring of the State IP Office; and (4) the issuing of an “Outline for Building an IPR Powerhouse (2021–2035)”.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper highlights China’s efforts to make its IPR system stronger and more just. It also discusses international observers’ reactions and pinpoints specific areas for further improvement.\n","PeriodicalId":45219,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/apjie-04-2023-0081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Since 2015, China has made efforts to reform its intellectual property rights (IPR) system to better protect and stimulate innovation. These reforms are a result of the demand for more stringent intellectual property (IP) protection from China’s domestic, innovative industries and a measure to ease the pressure exerted by its foreign trading partners, particularly against the background of the US-China trade dispute that started at the beginning of 2018. This paper summarizes these reforms and their implications. Design/methodology/approach This paper combines a variety of sources, including academic articles, government websites, news reports, industry surveys and expert opinions, to offer insights in China’s IPR system and its recent reforms. Findings This paper summarizes and discusses (1) the state’s law amendments, including the 2015 amendment of the “Law on Promoting the Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements”, the second amendment of the “Anti-Unfair Competition Law” with regard to trade secret protection, the fourth amendment of the “Patent Law”, and the legislations and regulations addressing the criticisms of the US administration over China’s so-called “forced” technology transfer policies; (2) the establishment of the specialized IP courts and tribunals since 2014; (3) the restructuring of the State IP Office; and (4) the issuing of an “Outline for Building an IPR Powerhouse (2021–2035)”. Originality/value This paper highlights China’s efforts to make its IPR system stronger and more just. It also discusses international observers’ reactions and pinpoints specific areas for further improvement.
更强大、更公正?中国知识产权制度的最新改革及其影响
目的自 2015 年以来,中国一直在努力改革知识产权(IPR)制度,以更好地保护和激励创新。这些改革是中国国内创新产业要求更严格的知识产权(IP)保护的结果,也是缓解外国贸易伙伴施加的压力的措施,尤其是在 2018 年初开始的中美贸易争端的背景下。本文对这些改革及其影响进行了总结。本文综合了学术文章、政府网站、新闻报道、行业调查和专家意见等多种来源,对中国的知识产权制度及其近期改革提出了见解。研究结果 本文总结并讨论了 (1) 国家的法律修订,包括 2015 年《促进科技成果转化法》的修订、《反不正当竞争法》关于商业秘密保护的第二次修订、《专利法》的第四次修订,以及针对美国政府对中国所谓 "强制 "技术转让政策的批评而制定的法律法规;(2) 自 2014 年起设立专门的知识产权法院和法庭;(3) 国家知识产权局的改组;以及 (4) 发布《知识产权强国建设纲要(2021-2035 年)》。独创性/价值 本文重点介绍了中国为使其知识产权制度更强大、更公正所做的努力。它还讨论了国际观察员的反应,并指出了需要进一步改进的具体领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信