What is Industry 4.0: a Review of the Literature Using the Conceptual Bibliographic Method

Q4 Decision Sciences
Paulo César Barros De Oliveira, Eliane Gonçalves Craveiro, Jefferson Praia Bezerra, Erivan dos Santos Oliveira, Daniel Nascimento-e-Silva
{"title":"What is Industry 4.0: a Review of the Literature Using the Conceptual Bibliographic Method","authors":"Paulo César Barros De Oliveira, Eliane Gonçalves Craveiro, Jefferson Praia Bezerra, Erivan dos Santos Oliveira, Daniel Nascimento-e-Silva","doi":"10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i12.4171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Scientific production has tried to understand the various evolutionary intricacies of Industry 4.0, the so-called fourth industrial revolution. As discoveries increase and deepen, there must also be an effort to understand the frontiers of scientific knowledge, its most noticeable and studied aspects, and those attributes that have only now been perceived. It is, therefore, necessary to periodically take stock of what science knows about the phenomenon to understand where it is headed and which paths have already been taken. Therefore, the need to take inventory of the current state of knowledge about Industry 4.0 was the theoretical justification for this study. \n  \nTheoretical framework: The theoretical architecture of this study consisted of the transformations that the industrial revolutionary stages caused in production systems, firstly, and then for the entire society. It involves aspects from various areas of scientific knowledge to understand the different perceptions contained in the scientific literature on the phenomenon of Industry 4.0. \n  \nDesign/Methodology/Approach: The conceptual bibliographic method was used to generate answers to three guiding questions: What are the main approaches to Industry 4.0? What are its main attributes? What is its irradiation logic? All conceptual definitions in scientific studies published in English and Portuguese available in the Google Scholar database from 2019 to 2020 were analyzed, with a total of 19 studies. The semantic analysis technique was used to identify the approaches and attributes, which were then organized by semantic proximity, constituting the semantic groupings on which the results were generated and interpreted. \n  \nFindings: The results showed the existence of eight groups of approaches (procedures, evolution, time, grouping, transformation, layer, organization, and model) and twelve groups of attributes (industrialization, transformation technologies, information technologies, integrated system, processes, society, quality, knowledge, planning, market, value chain, and automation). These discoveries made it possible to understand that Industry 4.0 has a driving force: knowledge, which spreads similarly in waves until it reaches the entire society and is not limited only to the interior of factories and economic organizations. \n  \nResearch, Practical, and Social Implications: Two implications of these findings stand out. The first is the dynamic nature of implementing Industry 4.0 in organizations, whether economic or not, which is done more quickly if knowledge and technologies are available or more slowly when expertise and technologies are fragile or non-existent. The second is teleological since the purpose of Industry 4.0 and all industrial revolutions is to continually improve production processes, even though these benefits often generate unwanted externalities, such as environmental impacts. This means that the progress of knowledge and its developments cannot be stopped but can be directed towards other purposes. \n  \nOriginality/Value: The main contribution of this study to science is to point out the current stage of the evolution of Industry 4.0 about previous revolutions. Three other contributions are also significant: identifying the main approaches to the phenomenon, its most prominent characteristics, and its irradiation dynamics.","PeriodicalId":31480,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Professional Business Review","volume":" 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Professional Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i12.4171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Scientific production has tried to understand the various evolutionary intricacies of Industry 4.0, the so-called fourth industrial revolution. As discoveries increase and deepen, there must also be an effort to understand the frontiers of scientific knowledge, its most noticeable and studied aspects, and those attributes that have only now been perceived. It is, therefore, necessary to periodically take stock of what science knows about the phenomenon to understand where it is headed and which paths have already been taken. Therefore, the need to take inventory of the current state of knowledge about Industry 4.0 was the theoretical justification for this study.   Theoretical framework: The theoretical architecture of this study consisted of the transformations that the industrial revolutionary stages caused in production systems, firstly, and then for the entire society. It involves aspects from various areas of scientific knowledge to understand the different perceptions contained in the scientific literature on the phenomenon of Industry 4.0.   Design/Methodology/Approach: The conceptual bibliographic method was used to generate answers to three guiding questions: What are the main approaches to Industry 4.0? What are its main attributes? What is its irradiation logic? All conceptual definitions in scientific studies published in English and Portuguese available in the Google Scholar database from 2019 to 2020 were analyzed, with a total of 19 studies. The semantic analysis technique was used to identify the approaches and attributes, which were then organized by semantic proximity, constituting the semantic groupings on which the results were generated and interpreted.   Findings: The results showed the existence of eight groups of approaches (procedures, evolution, time, grouping, transformation, layer, organization, and model) and twelve groups of attributes (industrialization, transformation technologies, information technologies, integrated system, processes, society, quality, knowledge, planning, market, value chain, and automation). These discoveries made it possible to understand that Industry 4.0 has a driving force: knowledge, which spreads similarly in waves until it reaches the entire society and is not limited only to the interior of factories and economic organizations.   Research, Practical, and Social Implications: Two implications of these findings stand out. The first is the dynamic nature of implementing Industry 4.0 in organizations, whether economic or not, which is done more quickly if knowledge and technologies are available or more slowly when expertise and technologies are fragile or non-existent. The second is teleological since the purpose of Industry 4.0 and all industrial revolutions is to continually improve production processes, even though these benefits often generate unwanted externalities, such as environmental impacts. This means that the progress of knowledge and its developments cannot be stopped but can be directed towards other purposes.   Originality/Value: The main contribution of this study to science is to point out the current stage of the evolution of Industry 4.0 about previous revolutions. Three other contributions are also significant: identifying the main approaches to the phenomenon, its most prominent characteristics, and its irradiation dynamics.
什么是工业 4.0:使用概念书目法的文献综述
目的:科学生产试图理解工业 4.0,即所谓的第四次工业革命的各种复杂演变。随着发现的增加和深化,还必须努力了解科学知识的前沿、其最引人注目和最值得研究的方面,以及那些现在才被认识到的属性。因此,有必要定期盘点科学对这一现象的认识,以了解其发展方向和已经走过的道路。因此,有必要对工业 4.0 的知识现状进行盘点,这是本研究的理论依据。 理论框架:本研究的理论架构包括工业革命阶段首先对生产系统,然后对整个社会造成的变革。它涉及科学知识各个领域的各个方面,以理解科学文献中关于工业 4.0 现象的不同认识。 设计/方法/途径:采用概念书目法来回答三个指导性问题:工业 4.0 的主要方法是什么?其主要属性是什么?其辐照逻辑是什么?对谷歌学术数据库(Google Scholar)中 2019 年至 2020 年发表的英语和葡萄牙语科学研究中的所有概念定义进行了分析,共有 19 项研究。使用语义分析技术确定了方法和属性,然后按照语义接近性进行了组织,构成了语义分组,并在此基础上生成和解释了结果。 研究结果:结果显示存在八组方法(程序、演变、时间、分组、转型、层、组织和模式)和十二组属性(工业化、转型技术、信息技术、集成系统、流程、社会、质量、知识、规划、市场、价值链和自动化)。这些发现使我们得以了解,工业 4.0 有一个驱动力:知识,它以类似的方式一波一波地传播,直至到达整个社会,而不仅仅局限于工厂和经济组织的内部。 研究、实践和社会意义:这些发现有两个突出的影响。首先是在经济或非经济组织中实施工业 4.0 的动态性质,如果知识和技术可用,则实施速度更快;如果专业知识和技术脆弱或不存在,则实施速度更慢。其次是目的论,因为工业 4.0 和所有工业革命的目的都是为了不断改进生产流程,尽管这些效益往往会产生不必要的外部效应,如对环境的影响。这意味着,知识的进步及其发展不能停止,但可以导向其他目的。 原创性/价值:本研究对科学的主要贡献在于指出了工业 4.0 演进的当前阶段与之前革命的关系。其他三项贡献也很重要:确定了研究该现象的主要方法、其最突出的特点及其辐照动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Professional Business Review
International Journal of Professional Business Review Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信