Development of The Default Concept Against Losses Due to Standard Agreements for Opening Banking Accounts

Sepriyadi Adhan Sulaiman, Joni Emirzon, Hamzah Hamzah
{"title":"Development of The Default Concept Against Losses Due to Standard Agreements for Opening Banking Accounts","authors":"Sepriyadi Adhan Sulaiman, Joni Emirzon, Hamzah Hamzah","doi":"10.25041/fiatjustisia.v17no4.3015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bank’s as commercial service providers aim, among others, to generate profits. In terms of providing their services they make agreements with consumers. Therefore the basis of the bank's legal responsibility with customers is contractual responsibility and the legal basis for the customer's lawsuit against the bank is a violation of the agreement or default. A detailed distinction of responsibility is not found in the Consumer Protection Law, as is known from the relatively large number of decisions of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body throughout Indonesia that were canceled by the Supreme Court for various reasons. In that regard, one of the reasons is that the Consumer Protection Law does not regulate the legal basis for lawsuits other than tort. This research uses a normative method that refers to Law Number 8 Year 1999 on Consumer Protection and principles as the basis for enforcing the law. The conceptual method is used by connecting and interpreting legal principles concerning consumer protection against unlawful acts on the principle of bank responsibility. The results of this research indicate that there is a need for a legal conception of the development of risk-based bank responsibility principles for losses due to standard agreements in opening banking accounts as a form of consumer protection. It is also an embodiment of the Consumer Protection Law which aims to create a balance of protection of consumer interests and business actors as an effort to create a healthy economy.","PeriodicalId":149215,"journal":{"name":"Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v17no4.3015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bank’s as commercial service providers aim, among others, to generate profits. In terms of providing their services they make agreements with consumers. Therefore the basis of the bank's legal responsibility with customers is contractual responsibility and the legal basis for the customer's lawsuit against the bank is a violation of the agreement or default. A detailed distinction of responsibility is not found in the Consumer Protection Law, as is known from the relatively large number of decisions of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body throughout Indonesia that were canceled by the Supreme Court for various reasons. In that regard, one of the reasons is that the Consumer Protection Law does not regulate the legal basis for lawsuits other than tort. This research uses a normative method that refers to Law Number 8 Year 1999 on Consumer Protection and principles as the basis for enforcing the law. The conceptual method is used by connecting and interpreting legal principles concerning consumer protection against unlawful acts on the principle of bank responsibility. The results of this research indicate that there is a need for a legal conception of the development of risk-based bank responsibility principles for losses due to standard agreements in opening banking accounts as a form of consumer protection. It is also an embodiment of the Consumer Protection Law which aims to create a balance of protection of consumer interests and business actors as an effort to create a healthy economy.
针对银行开户标准协议造成损失的违约概念的发展
银行作为商业服务提供商,其目标之一是创造利润。在提供服务时,他们与消费者签订协议。因此,银行对客户承担法律责任的基础是合同责任,客户对银行提起诉讼的法律依据是违反协议或违约。消费者保护法》中并没有对责任进行详细区分,这一点从最高法院以各种理由撤销的印尼全国消费者争议解决机构的大量裁决中可以看出。在这方面,原因之一是《消费者保护法》没有规定侵权行为以外的诉讼法律依据。本研究采用规范法,将 1999 年第 8 号《消费者保护法》和原则作为执法依据。本研究采用概念法,将有关消费者保护的法律原则与银行责任原则相联系并进行解释,以防止不法行为。研究结果表明,作为一种消费者保护形式,有必要从法律角度构思制定以风险为基础的银行责任原则,以应对在开设银行账户时因标准协议造成的损失。这也是《消费者保护法》的一种体现,该法旨在建立消费者利益保护与企业行为者之间的平衡,努力创造健康的经济。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信